Re: Necessity for the assignment form

2016-05-20 Thread KOBAYASHI Shinji
> David Stacey wrote: > For Cygwin, the boundary between trivial and substantial is usually > taken as ten lines. A two-line patch would probably be accepted > without an assignment form. Thank you for the clarification. Although I started another thread without submitting the patch, this in

Re: Necessity for the assignment form

2016-05-19 Thread David Stacey
On 20/05/16 01:44, KOBAYASHI Shinji wrote: I found a bug and I am willing to submit a patch (under winsup/cygwin). But before doing that, I was asked from my employer to clarify some points.https://cygwin.com/contrib.html says that the assignment form is required "if your change is going to be a

Re: Necessity for the assignment form

2016-05-19 Thread Warren Young
On May 19, 2016, at 6:44 PM, KOBAYASHI Shinji wrote: > > my patch is just two lines of modifications, so I believe > that it is not "a significant one". Is it okay to send such a small > patch without the assignment form? How about you just give the line of code and explain what’s wrong with

Necessity for the assignment form

2016-05-19 Thread KOBAYASHI Shinji
Hello, I found a bug and I am willing to submit a patch (under winsup/cygwin). But before doing that, I was asked from my employer to clarify some points. https://cygwin.com/contrib.html says that the assignment form is required "if your change is going to be a significant one in terms of the siz