> David Stacey wrote:
> For Cygwin, the boundary between trivial and substantial is usually
> taken as ten lines. A two-line patch would probably be accepted
> without an assignment form.
Thank you for the clarification. Although I started another thread
without submitting the patch, this in
On 20/05/16 01:44, KOBAYASHI Shinji wrote:
I found a bug and I am willing to submit a patch (under
winsup/cygwin). But before doing that, I was asked from my employer to
clarify some points.https://cygwin.com/contrib.html says that the
assignment form is required "if your change is going to be a
On May 19, 2016, at 6:44 PM, KOBAYASHI Shinji wrote:
>
> my patch is just two lines of modifications, so I believe
> that it is not "a significant one". Is it okay to send such a small
> patch without the assignment form?
How about you just give the line of code and explain what’s wrong with
Hello,
I found a bug and I am willing to submit a patch (under
winsup/cygwin). But before doing that, I was asked from my employer to
clarify some points. https://cygwin.com/contrib.html says that the
assignment form is required "if your change is going to be a
significant one in terms of the siz
4 matches
Mail list logo