mith; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: WOOO HOOO 1.5.3 Fixes This!!! Re: No output from DOS
commands via telnet using
>xinetd
>
>At 11:28 PM 4/16/2004, you wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I'm having the same problem as described in this thread. I just
>>ins
At 11:28 PM 4/16/2004, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm having the same problem as described in this thread. I just
>installed Cygwin, so I have the latest version.
>
>So, does the "1.5.3" version refer to something that I need to install
>in addition?
No. 1.5.3 presumably refers to version 1.5.3 of th
Hi,
I'm having the same problem as described in this thread. I just
installed Cygwin, so I have the latest version.
So, does the "1.5.3" version refer to something that I need to install
in addition?
TIA,
-Tennis
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem re
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:43:33AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:27:27AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>>On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:26:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>wrote:
*Kisses and flower petals* ;-) for cgf,
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 09:27:27AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:26:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >*Kisses and flower petals* ;-) for cgf, Corrina, Igor, Elfyn, and all
> >the rest who helped make this happen!!!
>
> That would be me, actually.
Yeah, and wh
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:26:33AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>*Kisses and flower petals* ;-) for cgf, Corrina, Igor, Elfyn, and all
>the rest who helped make this happen!!!
That would be me, actually.
cgf
>Subject: Re: No output from DOS commands via telnet using xinetd
--
Un
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks Elfyn - you did a great job fixing the *silence* problem ;-)
>
> Yea - I guess if I want it, I got to do some work to get it. I'll try
> running those traces later today
> if I get some time. In the meantime if anyone else can run a quick t
- something to feel *good* about. ;-)
Brian Kelly
"Elfyn McBratney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/20/2003 08:50:43 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject: Re: No
Elfyn McBratney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > "The silence is deafening". Apparently there aren't too many folks using
> > telnet with
> > xinetd ( I know, I know, SSH is what everyone's doing ). Anyhow, I do have
> > a fairly important
> > need
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "The silence is deafening". Apparently there aren't too many folks using
> telnet with
> xinetd ( I know, I know, SSH is what everyone's doing ). Anyhow, I do have
> a fairly important
> need for this combo, and the problem outlined below is a sign
n Kelly
Brian Kelly
08/18/2003 03:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: No output from DOS commands via telnet using xinetd
I've noticed that running most DOS commands via telnet using *xinetd*
produced no output. Runing DOS commands via telnet using *inetd* works as
expected
I've noticed that running most DOS commands via telnet using *xinetd*
produced no output. Runing DOS commands via telnet using *inetd* works as
expected and DOES produce the expected output. For instance, in telnet via
inetd, typing:
net help
produces the following output:
12 matches
Mail list logo
