Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Welcome to the 21st century, where computers can't even
unambiguously
represent written text.
Isn't this something unicode was meant to solve?
Yes, and if implemented properly, it mostly does.
or does
unicode still need a codepage to map to glyphs?
Hmm...interesting. Not entirely sure what the implications
of what you are saying are (as I don't really understand codepages).
Does a codepage represent a character with 16 bits? or 8?
Could you recommend a book or a URL on the subject? Maybe I
should look at this when I have more
2 matches
Mail list logo
