Corinna,
thanks for your feedback!
2009/3/12 Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com:
On Mar 12 17:44, Robert Klemme wrote:
The second flock does not start the command as I expect it to be.
I am referring to the man page of flock which says this about option -w:
Fail (with an exit code
On Mar 12 15:40, Robert Klemme wrote:
Hi,
I searched the archives but could not find any related issue. My
problem is this: I use flock with a timeout but apparently the timeout
does not work, i.e. flock waits longer than specified. Script is
attached. Output is here:
The flock
On Mar 12 15:40, Robert Klemme wrote:
Hi,
I searched the archives but could not find any related issue. My
problem is this: I use flock with a timeout but apparently the timeout
does not work, i.e. flock waits longer than specified. Script is
attached. Output is here:
This is ok,
Hi again,
2009/3/12 Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com:
On Mar 12 15:40, Robert Klemme wrote:
Any ideas? Am I doing something wrong?
On second thought, maybe I don't understand what you're expecting.
Running the testcase on a Linux box I get this:
Linux calimero 2.6.[etc]
2009/3/12 Corinna Vinschen corinna-cyg...@cygwin.com:
On second thought, maybe I don't understand what you're expecting.
Running the testcase on a Linux box I get this:
Linux calimero 2.6.[etc]
-rw-r--r-- 1 corinna vinschen 0 Mar 12 16:48 lock
timeout 10
started 1
3644 Thu Mar 12 16:48:48
On Mar 12 17:44, Robert Klemme wrote:
The second flock does not start the command as I expect it to be.
I am referring to the man page of flock which says this about option -w:
Fail (with an exit code of 1) if the lock cannot be acquired within
seconds seconds. Decimal fractional values
6 matches
Mail list logo
