Brian Dessent wrote:
I can't possibly see how this would be due to the changes in newlib, but
Sigh, I knew those sounded like famous last words when I typed them.
The actual error was unrelated to this frame, it was occuring several
frames up and was a cascading failure that originated with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Brian Dessent on 5/27/2007 8:57 AM:
Brian Dessent wrote:
I can't possibly see how this would be due to the changes in newlib, but
Sigh, I knew those sounded like famous last words when I typed them.
The actual error was unrelated
--- Christopher Faylor ha scritto:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:51:48PM +0200, Angelo
Graziosi wrote:
Using cygwin-inst-20070523.tar.bz2 there is XPDF
that core dumps loading a
pdf file.
The same happens with a cygwin1.dll 1.5.24-2
rebuilt with CVS newlib dated
May 18.
Instead using
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:20:38PM +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote:
--- Christopher Faylor ha scritto:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:51:48PM +0200, Angelo
Graziosi wrote:
Using cygwin-inst-20070523.tar.bz2 there is XPDF
that core dumps loading a
pdf file.
The same happens with a cygwin1.dll
--- Christopher Faylor
strace is not a reliable indicator of problem
location but from the above it seems
like the error is coming from a DLL other than
cygwin which is located at
0x6B14d431 .
cygt1-5.dll 0x1000
cygwin1.dll 0x6100
cygfreetype-6.dll
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Marco Atzeri wrote:
--- Christopher Faylor
strace is not a reliable indicator of problem
location but from the above it seems
like the error is coming from a DLL other than
cygwin which is located at
0x6B14d431 .
cygt1-5.dll0x1000
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'll bet that the OP had run rebaseall
Yes!
Usually I run 'rebaseall' with snapshots or rebuilt 'cygwin1.dll'
Pherhaps, in this case, is there some contra-indications to rebaseall?
so they would have to go through this exercise themselves
Sorry, but I have not
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 04:38:22PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I'll bet that the OP had run rebaseall
Yes! Usually I run 'rebaseall' with snapshots or rebuilt 'cygwin1.dll'
Perhaps, in this case, is there some contra-indications to rebaseall?
No, not at all. It just
Marco Atzeri wrote:
looks cygXm-2.dll from
cygwinports libXm2-0.95.0-1
Yes, it's Motif alright, but we can eliminate Cygwin Ports from the
equation, as I get the following using the cygXm-2.dll from
lesstif-0.94.4-1:
#0 0x6ea5d441 in cygXm-2!_LTAddPixmapToCache ()
from
Brian Dessent wrote:
I'll build xpdf and lesstif with debug symbols and continue.
It doesn't really become any more clear, unfortunately.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
_LTAddPixmapToCache (pixmap_name=0x22c870 --anon pixmap \,
pixmap=8388732, screen=0x1006bc18,
Using cygwin-inst-20070523.tar.bz2 there is XPDF that core dumps loading a
pdf file.
The same happens with a cygwin1.dll 1.5.24-2 rebuilt with CVS newlib dated
May 18.
Instead using cygwin1.dll 1.5.24-2 rebuilt with CVS newlib dated May 01,
XPDF works fine.
Cheers,
Angelo.
--
Using cygwin-inst-20070523.tar.bz2 there is XPDF that core dumps loading a
pdf file.
The same happens with a cygwin1.dll 1.5.24-2 rebuilt with CVS newlib dated
May 18.
Instead using cygwin1.dll 1.5.24-2 rebuilt with CVS newlib dated May 01,
XPDF works fine.
Cheers,
Angelo.
--
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 10:51:48PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
Using cygwin-inst-20070523.tar.bz2 there is XPDF that core dumps loading a
pdf file.
The same happens with a cygwin1.dll 1.5.24-2 rebuilt with CVS newlib dated
May 18.
Instead using cygwin1.dll 1.5.24-2 rebuilt with CVS newlib
13 matches
Mail list logo
