Greetings, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C]!
>> what your test program was actually doing. But you seem to be assuming that
>> calling fchmod on a socket descriptor should affect the permissions on the
>> socket file (assuming the socket is bound). Is that documented anywhere?
>> POSIX
>>
On 7/2/2022 3:37 PM, Lavrentiev, Anton (NIH/NLM/NCBI) [C] wrote:
what your test program was actually doing. But you seem to be assuming that
calling fchmod on a socket descriptor should affect the permissions on the
socket file (assuming the socket is bound). Is that documented anywhere?
> what your test program was actually doing. But you seem to be assuming that
> calling fchmod on a socket descriptor should affect the permissions on the
> socket file (assuming the socket is bound). Is that documented anywhere?
> POSIX
> says that the behavior of fchmod on a socket
3 matches
Mail list logo
