Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:29:41AM +, Daniel Miller wrote:
- If I run ver /r from the 4NT window, with my current directory on
c: \ (which is my WinXP boot drive), it says:
4NT 5.00U Windows XP 5.1 4NT Build 125 Windows
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:02:13PM +, Daniel Miller wrote:
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:29:41AM +, Daniel Miller wrote:
- If I run ver /r from the 4NT window, with my current directory on
c: \ (which is my WinXP boot
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 10:26:32AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 02:02:13PM +, Daniel Miller wrote:
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:29:41AM +, Daniel Miller wrote:
- If I run ver /r from the 4NT
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
gateway to this list.
I found this in your cygcheck output as one of your environment
variables in the failing 4NT case:
__COMPAT_LAYER = `Win98 DisableThemes '
This is the cause of your problems. I don't know
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:00:27PM +, Daniel Miller wrote:
I'm running 4NT (current version) on a Windows XP system. Recently I
got a spyware program on my machine which messed some things up. I
removed the spyware, but I find that I cannot run any Cygwin utilities
from the 4NT prompt
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 08:00:27PM +, Daniel Miller wrote:
I'm running 4NT (current version) on a Windows XP system. Recently I
got a spyware program on my machine which messed some things up. I
removed the spyware, but I find that I cannot run any Cygwin
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 04:32:58PM -0400, CyberZombie wrote:
OT: Any reason why you haven't moved to the Cygwin bash shell? IMO,
it's much better than 4NT (my prior command-line-of-choice prior to
Cygwin)...
I don't agree. I love 4NT and use it + cygwin all of the time. I've used
4NT longer
CyberZombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OT: Any reason why you haven't moved to the Cygwin bash shell? IMO,
it's much better than 4NT (my prior command-line-of-choice prior to
Cygwin)...
No, I find 4NT to be more flexible than BASH... filename completion is
Daniel Miller wrote:
CyberZombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
OT: Any reason why you haven't moved to the Cygwin bash shell? IMO,
it's much better than 4NT (my prior command-line-of-choice prior to
Cygwin)...
No, I find 4NT to be more flexible than BASH...
CyberZombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, I find 4NT to be more flexible than BASH... filename completion is
handier, especially when multiple filenames match what you type;
editing of environment variables (especially PATH) with eset is
unmatched by Bash, and there are
[snip]
For filename completion, the following might help
.inputrc:
set completion-ignore-case on
set bell-style none
Oh nonono dude, gotta have the completion bell, that's the best part!
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
strace isn't a cygwin application so something is really strange here.
Can you run cygcheck.exe? That's not a cygwin app either. Maybe one
of
the utilities at the http://sysinternals.com/ site will help.
Otherwise, it
Daniel Miller wrote:
CyberZombie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No, I find 4NT to be more flexible than BASH... filename completion is
handier, especially when multiple filenames match what you type;
editing of environment variables (especially PATH) with eset is
unmatched
On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:29:41AM +, Daniel Miller wrote:
- If I run ver /r from the 4NT window, with my current directory on
c: \ (which is my WinXP boot drive), it says:
4NT 5.00U Windows XP 5.1 4NT Build 125 Windows XP Build 2600 Service
Pack 1 Registered to Daniel Miller S/N CD600342
14 matches
Mail list logo
