On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 19:33 +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
> It was bugging me for quite some time now. I don't like POSIX RE - they are
> cumbersome and unwieldy.
> Is there a possibility to build man for Cygwin with PerlRE support?
Presumably that would come via PCRE, which man-db does not
On Oct 16, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>
> Is there a possibility to build man for Cygwin with PerlRE support?
I’m curious: what sort of incantations do you frequently give to man which
involve REs?
Maybe I’m just too old-school, but I wasn’t aware that modern
On Oct 16, 2015, at 2:29 PM, Mike Cappella wrote:
>
>> On Oct 16, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 19:33 +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
Is there a possibility to build man for Cygwin with PerlRE support?
>>>
>>> Presumably that would come via PCRE, which
On Oct 16, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 19:33 +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
>> Is there a possibility to build man for Cygwin with PerlRE support?
>
> Presumably that would come via PCRE, which man-db does not currently
> support. Perhaps PTC upstream.
If
> On Oct 16, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 19:33 +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
> >> Is there a possibility to build man for Cygwin with PerlRE support?
> >
> > Presumably that would come via PCRE, which man-db does not currently
> > support. Perhaps PTC
On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 14:19 -0600, Warren Young wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2015, at 12:18 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-10-16 at 19:33 +0300, Andrey Repin wrote:
> >> Is there a possibility to build man for Cygwin with PerlRE support?
> >
> > Presumably that would come via PCRE,
Greetings, Yaakov Selkowitz!
>> It was bugging me for quite some time now. I don't like POSIX RE - they are
>> cumbersome and unwieldy.
>> Is there a possibility to build man for Cygwin with PerlRE support?
> Presumably that would come via PCRE, which man-db does not currently
> support.
Greetings, Warren Young!
> On Oct 16, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
>>
>> Is there a possibility to build man for Cygwin with PerlRE support?
> I’m curious: what sort of incantations do you frequently give to man which
> involve REs?
Typical ones. F.e.
^\s+\b
Greetings, Warren Young!
> Is there a possibility to build man for Cygwin with PerlRE support?
Presumably that would come via PCRE, which man-db does not currently
support. Perhaps PTC upstream.
>>>
>>> If there were such a mode, would it be allowed to enable it, since that
DESCRIPTION
Cygwin is a UNIX environment, developed by Red Hat, for
Windows.
Cygwin was up and running long before Red Hat came into the picture. Which
is
why it's not Redhatwin ;-).
Straight off the homepage. Maybe it should be currently developed by Red Hat.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:34:51AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
DESCRIPTION
Cygwin is a UNIX environment, developed by Red Hat, for
Windows.
Cygwin was up and running long before Red Hat came into the picture. Which
is
why it's not Redhatwin ;-).
Straight
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 07:34:51AM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
Hmm... can we change the name to RedhatWinix please? It's catchier
Urg.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developermailto:[EMAIL
DESCRIPTION
Cygwin is a UNIX environment, developed by Red Hat, for
Windows.
Cygwin was up and running long before Red Hat came into the picture. Which
is
why it's not Redhatwin ;-).
Straight off the homepage.
Great. Do they also have a statement to the
OK everyone here is your chance to speak your mind about what someone
who installs Cygwin and types man intro (expecting a revelation, no doubt)
will see:
INTRO(1) Cygwin INTRO(1)
NAME
intro - Introduction to the Cygwin Environment
DESCRIPTION
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 06:59:05PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
The majority of the tools Cygwin provides are part of the Free Software
Foundation's GNU Operating System.
I don't know that this is true but, regardless, the term GNU Operating
System doesn't make any sense to me.
(In
fact, Cygwin was once known as GNU/Win32.)
I don't think there is any reason to mention this. It is really ancient
history now.
I have BA in History. :)
As such, the user environment is more similar to a GNU/Linux system
than, for example, Sun Solaris.
I find the term GNU/Linux a
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 07:38:48PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I'll move around the BUGS stuff, I was going to add that to intro.3
also.
Good.
COPYRIGHT looks good?
Yes.
I was already thinking that COMPATIBILITY seemed too wordy. Here's a
maybe better one:
COMPATIBILITY
DESCRIPTION
Cygwin is a UNIX environment, developed by Red Hat, for
Windows.
Cygwin was up and running long before Red Hat came into the picture. Which is
why it's not Redhatwin ;-).
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer. Patriot.
--
Unsubscribe info:
After looking at this, I think two intro pages would be best. Here is
my RFC for intro.3:
INTRO(3) Cygwin INTRO(3)
NAME
intro - Introduction to the Cygwin API
DESCRIPTION
Cygwin is a UNIX environment, developed by Red Hat, for
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 07:40:27PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
After looking at this, I think two intro pages would be best. Here is
my RFC for intro.3:
INTRO(3) Cygwin INTRO(3)
NAME
intro - Introduction to the Cygwin API
DESCRIPTION
I mean the easiest way is maybe to do a cygwin.1 man-page that
contains the text cygwin is a windows clone for unix and then just
add all comments received :-)
Shouldn't that be a unix clone for windows? Good thing I'll be writing
the documentation. :)
/ Joshua Daniel Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I mean the easiest way is maybe to do a cygwin.1 man-page that
| contains the text cygwin is a windows clone for unix and then just
| add all comments received :-)
|
| Shouldn't that be a unix clone for windows? Good thing I'll be writing
|
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:31:37PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I was thinking about (end-user) documentation. It seems like there are quite
a few questions that come up about What kind of UNIX is Cygwin? and more
than once there have been questions about a man intro page.
I know a little
I think this is a wonderful idea. Can I sign you up to improve the
documentation, too? I'm sure that a lot of it is out of date or needs
more details.
Sure. I'll do my best, though to warn you I use cygwin almost exclusively in
user-land and am not very intimate with the internals. I do
/ Joshua Daniel Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I think this is a wonderful idea. Can I sign you up to improve the
| documentation, too? I'm sure that a lot of it is out of date or needs
| more details.
|
| Sure. I'll do my best, though to warn you I use cygwin almost exclusively in
|
25 matches
Mail list logo