On 11/30/2011 4:08 PM, Tim McDaniel wrote:
I dunno whether anyone here know about Emacs, but I thought I would
ask.
In a previous setup (Windows XP, 32-bit), I believe that running the
Emacs function
(file-exists-p c:/)
produced t.
Now, with the latest Cygwin, Windows 7, 64-bit, emacs-version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ht writes:
Or you can compile your own 21.4.17 from source, but this is _not_ a
'straight-out-of-the-box' exercise. If you try this and have trouble,
I'll try to dig out my config.status and other notes from the last
time I made it all work. I
James R. Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have you actually tried installing the x-server and using it? It takes a
while
Yes. I just wanted to stay away from extra stuff. But as you
surmised, not if it requires huge energy output.
to download, but can be used somewhat unobtrusively.
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:39:39 GMT, Harry Putnam wrote:
My background is unix/linux so when I find myself on MS OS of one
vintage or another I sorely need the cygwin tools.
However, one thing I've not found a way to get smoothed out is how to
run emacs.
I want to run emacs in gui mode
Andy Moreton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:39:39 GMT, Harry Putnam wrote:
My background is unix/linux so when I find myself on MS OS of one
vintage or another I sorely need the cygwin tools.
However, one thing I've not found a way to get smoothed out is how to
run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harry Putnam writes:
I want to run emacs in gui mode but without starting an X session.
That is, similar to what is possible with ntemacs.
This can be done easily with XEmacs. You can get an only slightly
stale version (21.4.13) straight out of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
[...]
This can be done easily with XEmacs. You can get an only slightly
stale version (21.4.13) straight out of the box from XEmacs.org [1]
(pick 'native windows').
Or you can compile your own 21.4.17 from source, but this is _not_ a
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Harry Putnam wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henry S. Thompson) writes:
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR. Thanks.
[...]
This can be done easily with XEmacs. You can get an only slightly
stale version (21.4.13) straight out of the box from XEmacs.org [1]
(pick
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:46:38 GMT, Harry Putnam wrote:
Andy Moreton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:39:39 GMT, Harry Putnam wrote:
[snipped]
You may find it easier to teach NTemacs about cygwin paths:
http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/wiki/cygwin-mount.el
What is
Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, you could try compiling Emacs yourself and linking it against libW11
(that comes with rxvt). Most likely, this will not work, but I'm sure
patches for missing functionality would be thoughtfully considered by the
developers of rxvt. 'Tis a
Andy Moreton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(cygwin-mount-activate)
Egad I am being a tedious bore. I failed to eval that in my test.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
Andy Moreton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 12:46:38 GMT, Harry Putnam wrote:
Andy Moreton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:39:39 GMT, Harry Putnam wrote:
[snipped]
You may find it easier to teach NTemacs about cygwin paths:
Have you actually tried installing the x-server and using it? It takes a while
to download, but can be used somewhat unobtrusively.
The default startxwin.sh shell script starts xwin in the multiwindow mode,
which means you get a black X icon in the system tray when there are no X
clients, and
S Gupta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am at home now, and if I have my display environment
variable set to: ${HOST}:0.0 or :0
and if I have the program Cygwin/XFree86 rl open in
the background, emacs opens up in the XFree program
and not the current window. (If I do not have the
XFree program open,
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
No. If you want NT Emacs to understand Cygwin paths, get cygwin-mount.el from
http://www.emacswiki.org/elisp/index.html.
The Cygwin GNU emacs understands //machine/share syntax, but not X:/path syntax.
Normal Cygwin /some/path/to/file syntax is fine also (of
Hi Gareth and all,
just to mention that I'm using cygwin's telnetd now (I was using exceed's
telnetd), and now emacs -nw works perfectly!
thanks
Kris
To add to my tests I reported in my previous mail:
- I am on my NT PC
- I telnet (using cygwin's telnet) to my NT PC
-
On Wednesday 9 Oct 02, Christopher Faylor writes:
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:10:31PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I was looking at the FAQ and realized some questions need an update.
I plan to do this. However, some of them I don't have the knowledge
to frame a correct updated answer.
However, I don't use the Cygwin port of Emacs (yet?), so I also do not
know the status of using emacs -nw from a remote shell.
Has anyone tried this? Does it work?
Hi
I have NT4.0, latest cygwin, Exceed for X-windows emulation and Exceed
telnetd.
I let cygwin-setup install 'emacs with X
On Thursday 10 Oct 02, Bjoern Kahl AG Resy writes:
However, I don't use the Cygwin port of Emacs (yet?), so I also do not
know the status of using emacs -nw from a remote shell.
Has anyone tried this? Does it work?
I have installed Cygwin including the GNU-emacs package offered by
Hi Bjoern,
that's interesting, as emacs -nw doesn't work for me... Could you offer a
bit more detail on what you mean with remote execution? Where do you com
from? Which daemon are you using?
To add to my tests I reported in my previous mail:
- I am on my NT PC
- I telnet (using cygwin's
To add to my tests I reported in my previous mail:
- I am on my NT PC
- I telnet (using cygwin's telnet) to my NT PC
- \cygwin\cygwin, emacs- nw
This is a lot better than when I telnetted from my linux box. The display
is
ok now. However, arrow keys don't work (they get entered as ABC etc.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:10:31PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
I was looking at the FAQ and realized some questions need an update.
I plan to do this. However, some of them I don't have the knowledge
to frame a correct updated answer. One I particularly noticed was:
Is there a Cygwin
I take that back - I have found references to Emacs, but can anyone point me
in the right direction for a download site (hopefully with a few
instructions)?
Thanks!
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Robert Mark Bram
Sent: Wednesday,
On Thursday 21 Mar 02, Robert Mark Bram writes:
I take that back - I have found references to Emacs, but can anyone point me
in the right direction for a download site (hopefully with a few
instructions)?
Since GNU Emacs is not a Cygwin application, such a query is off-topic
for this list. I
Hello,
I am very interested in a cygwin/xfree86
emacs, because NTemacs can't be regarded
as an full emacs port, and xemacs isn't
really compatible, and much too slow.
Furthermore I believe that since the
21.1 emacs has become better than xemacs.
However I must mention that I am very
happy that
Jon Cast wrote:
Sorry to start a flamewar, but this needs replying to:
Sure In PRIVATE mail
Please take this incipient flamewar offline
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwincom/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwincom/bugshtml
Documentation:
Katherina O'Connor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am very interested in a cygwin/xfree86 emacs,
Thank you for your interest.
reasoning skipped
However I must mention that I am very happy that xemacs is available
in a cygwin version.
Naturally.
In the past I tried porting emacs to
Charles Wilson wrote:
Jon Cast wrote:
Sorry to start a flamewar, but this needs replying to:
Sure In PRIVATE mail
Please take this incipient flamewar offline
I have no interest in a flame war even offline I didn't even understand
half of what Jon was saying about political beliefs
From: Jon Cast [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 21:33:11 -0600
CygEmacs will have UNIX APIs for I/O (files and
sockets), and M$Windows APIs for the display and the keyboard. This
is already done (partly) by the Cygwin port of rxvt.
I used to agree with you, but the more I
FWIW, there's a true Cygwin port of XEmacs available now (as well as a
Windows-native port). See http://www.xemacs.org
Jon Cast wrote:
You wrote:
I think that we need a CygEmacs - an emacs that will be compiled
with the real Cygwin ported gcc (i.e. without the
-mno-cygwin).
I
David Rothenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, there's a true Cygwin port of XEmacs available now (as well as
a Windows-native port). See http://www.xemacs.org
FWIW, I'm a GNU fanatic who wouldn't touch XEmacs with a ten-foot
pole :)
Seriously, this kind of message is one (although by
Jon Cast wrote:
FWIW, I'm a GNU fanatic who wouldn't touch XEmacs with a ten-foot
pole :)
smiley notwithstanding, that doesn't seem all that amusing to me
XEmacs is of course GPL'd, and I'd direct anyone who might wonder
about the source of misguided comments such as the above to:
You wrote:
I think that we need a CygEmacs - an emacs that will be compiled
with the real Cygwin ported gcc (i.e. without the
-mno-cygwin).
I should probably point out that I am (slowly) working on such a port
of Emacs.
CygEmacs will have UNIX APIs for I/O (files and
sockets), and
33 matches
Mail list logo
