to bug report filed here:
http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bug.html?id=12840
-Original Message-
From: Sonam Chauhan
Sent: Wednesday, 18 May 2005 3:32 PM
To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
Subject: RE: problems in Perl process management
Thanks for raising 'ps -W' behavior Chris. It is interesting
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 05:11:00PM +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
Hi - Asking again since I didn't get a response...
You got a response before you asked the question.
demonstrated by my testcase script), the CW_GETPINFO_FULL query
returns: 1. Invalid PPIDs
Only PPIDs for cygwin processes are
Please clarify so I understand better.
Are you saying that since...
ps -W will also not always properly report on execed processes in
^
general. Since ps -W uses CW_GETPINFO_FULL,
...
... by implication, CW_GETPINFO_FULL does
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 09:45:50AM +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
Please clarify so I understand better.
Are you saying that since...
ps -W will also not always properly report on execed processes in
^
general. Since ps -W uses
Chris:
ps -W will also not always properly report on execed processes in
^
general. Since ps -W uses CW_GETPINFO_FULL,
...
Won't it be better fixing this bug, than fixing 'Proc::ProcessTable' and
'ps -W' and all the other
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 02:41:28PM +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
cgf wrote:
I don't believe I've ever heard anyone complaining about the way this
works in ps -W or in all of the other programs which use this.
There's a first time for everything.
I guess I'll wait for the second, third, and fourth
I guess I'll wait for the second, third, and fourth time for everything
before I start getting really worried.
As you like.
It seems to me that it would be a lot easier to work around in the perl
module.
Can you suggest any other CW_... query that would report on PIDs
accurately?
Yitzchak: sorry this reply is late.
I just reread the whole thread three times, and fail to detect any
rudeness from him. He did confess to being flip, though. (I thought
it was just an attempt at humor.)
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=flip
I also notice that deeper forked
Sonam Chauhan schrieb:
Reini - Thanks for replying man.
I didn't complain yet upstream at rt.cpan.org because I wanted to wait
for our 5.8.7 release. But you can do it by yourself also,
OK, I'm not that talented, so I didn't try fixing this bug, but I did report
it with a better testcase here:
Reini:
[Note, I'm no Cygwin expert, so please correct any misunderstandings.]
or fix it in this module XS. It's really easy with the cygwin provided
translation functions.
See http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2005-02/msg00154.html
...
After all, Proc::ProcessTable misreports the PID and
On Wed, May 18, 2005 at 01:01:48PM +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
Reini:
[Note, I'm no Cygwin expert, so please correct any misunderstandings.]
or fix it in this module XS. It's really easy with the cygwin provided
translation functions.
See
Thanks for raising 'ps -W' behavior Chris. It is interesting.
From what I gather, the root problem is that for some processes (as
demonstrated by my testcase script), the CW_GETPINFO_FULL query returns:
1. Invalid PPIDs
Only PPIDs for cygwin processes are returned. Everything else should
Australia Ltd.
Phone: +61-2-9335-0725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Reini Urban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 15 May 2005 2:32 AM
To: 'cygwin@cygwin.com'
Cc: Sonam Chauhan
Subject: Re: problems in Perl process management
Sonam Chauhan schrieb:
I had
Sonam Chauhan schrieb:
I had thought Gerrit would release a new 5.8.6 with them, but this
doesn't seem to have happened; don't know if I somehow dropped the
ball on that. In any case, I'm really really hoping that 5.8.7 is
released in the next few weeks.
I don't know anything about problems with
Yitzchak:
I had thought Gerrit would release a new 5.8.6 with them, but this
doesn't seem to have happened; don't know if I somehow dropped the
ball on that. In any case, I'm really really hoping that 5.8.7 is
released in the next few weeks.
I don't know anything about problems with
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 07:11:23PM +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
Can you confirm whether your patch addresses a problem Reini reported your
thread in Feb? It was this message:
http://sourceware.org/ml/cygwin/2005-02/msg00224.html
...where Reini said:
But the cygwin pid's seem to be
Commerce, Corporate Express Australia Ltd.
Phone: +61-2-9335-0725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 May 2005 1:18 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: problems in Perl process management
YJS
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:53:07AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
Earlier topquoting somewhat reformated.
Apologies for not trimming the tail end of that (including email
addresses).
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 11:18:16AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
bearing on the statement However, I also notice that deeper forked
processes (grandchildren) refuse to die. This script is only run using
ActiveState Perl. If someone is talking about fork on windows in a
cygwin mailing list
Christopher -
Yes, if you send a kill -9 to a pid that shows up in ps but is
associated with a non-cygwin process, it should work.
So what me and Jurgen were discussing works, and you were wrong. Thanks for
revisiting your point after your earlier rudeness.
Regards,
Sonam Chauhan
--
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04:24:56PM +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
Christopher -
Yes, if you send a kill -9 to a pid that shows up in ps but is
associated with a non-cygwin process, it should work.
So what me and Jurgen were discussing works, and you were wrong.
Thanks for revisiting your point
, Corporate Express Australia Ltd.
Phone: +61-2-9335-0725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 12 May 2005 1:18 AM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: problems in Perl process management
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 04
I also would like to know if it is possible.
However, it could be that it has nothing to do with Cygwin. I have
a Perl script which forks several children and monitors their output.
If a child fails, then it has no use to run all forked processes further
and I kill them with the perl 'kill'
that's by design if u want to kill an entire tree u can do so with process
explorer a free download from www.sysinternals.com.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Jurgen Defurne
I also would like to know if it is possible.
However, it could be that it has nothing to do with Cygwin. I
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 01:12:05PM +0200, Jurgen Defurne wrote:
I also would like to know if it is possible.
However, it could be that it has nothing to do with Cygwin. I have
a Perl script which forks several children and monitors their output.
If a child fails, then it has no use to run all
, Corporate Express Australia Ltd.
Phone: +61-2-9335-0725, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jurgen Defurne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 May 2005 9:12 PM
To: Sonam Chauhan
Cc: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: problems in Perl process management
I also
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:19:14PM +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
Hi Christopher -
your response to Jurgen had mentioned:
ActiveState perl is a windows program. You can't send cygwin (aka unix)
signals to a windows proram.
This should be possible if the ActiPerl Windows executable was executed
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 11:22:49PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:19:14PM +1000, Sonam Chauhan wrote:
Hi Christopher -
your response to Jurgen had mentioned:
ActiveState perl is a windows program. You can't send cygwin (aka unix)
signals to a windows proram.
This
28 matches
Mail list logo
