On Nov 6 01:27, Jan Bruun Andersen wrote:
> I am not sure if this DLL snapshot (cygwin1-20151105-dll) is supposed
> to fix stuff like this, but I think I remember something about
> ordering ACL's?
It's explained in the announcement.
> Anyway I have this 'bin' directory in my home which shows up
You were correct Corinna. It was indeed the administrators group that
was the owner. Windows security is perplexing to an old Unix-hand like
me. I guess something in the process of migrating and restoring my
home directory from another PC made the admin group the owner instead
of me. Luckily I
On Nov 4 22:25, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Achim Gratz writes:
> > Just confirmed this on another system. If I kill the child, then the
> > parent resumes and finishes the test loop alright and it can be
> > interrupted again from the shell. The hang happens after the first test
> > succeeds in both
On Nov 5 18:55, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 5 10:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 4 22:25, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > > Achim Gratz writes:
> > > > Just confirmed this on another system. If I kill the child, then the
> > > > parent resumes and finishes the test loop alright and it can
On Nov 5 10:24, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 4 22:25, Achim Gratz wrote:
> > Achim Gratz writes:
> > > Just confirmed this on another system. If I kill the child, then the
> > > parent resumes and finishes the test loop alright and it can be
> > > interrupted again from the shell. The hang
Corinna Vinschen writes:
>> I (hopefully) fixed the issue and uploaded yet another developer
>> snapshot to https://cygwin.com/snapshots/ (with ACL changes again).
>
> Hang on for a while, I forgot to push the changes upstream before
> creating the snapshot. Try in half an hour or so.
I am not sure if this DLL snapshot (cygwin1-20151105-dll) is supposed
to fix stuff like this, but I think I remember something about
ordering ACL's?
Anyway I have this 'bin' directory in my home which shows up with
'Administratörer' (Swedish for Administrators) as the owner. I had
hoped it would
Achim Gratz writes:
> With the new -06 version, things are more consistent:
> both the child and the parent hang after the first test in the loop and
> ^C doesn't work at all. Plus it already fails at t/01_simple instead of
> at t/02_fork_method.
Just confirmed this on another system. If I kill
Achim Gratz writes:
> Just confirmed this on another system. If I kill the child, then the
> parent resumes and finishes the test loop alright and it can be
> interrupted again from the shell. The hang happens after the first test
> succeeds in both the parent and child.
I have just managed to
Corinna Vinschen writes:
> I released a new TEST version of Cygwin, 2.3.0-0.6.
>
> This test release only fixes a really stupid bug I introduced
> while trying to fix the pending signal problem reported in
> https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-09/msg00197.html
There are probably still some daemons
10 matches
Mail list logo
