Re: OpenBLAS patch for Cygwin

2018-02-13 Thread Erik Bray
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Achim Gratz wrote: > Erik Bray writes: >> Assuming this looks good (feedback welcome) it might be nice to have >> this patch included in the next release of the official OpenBLAS >> package for Cygwin since its incompatibility with fork() has caused >> problems in

Re: OpenBLAS patch for Cygwin

2018-02-13 Thread Erik Bray
Hi, Sorry for the non-response. Been traveling for the last week and not really checking this e-mail much. On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 06/02/2018 13:10, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Users/maintainers of OpenBLAS on Cygwin may be interested in this >> patch to

Re: OpenBLAS patch for Cygwin

2018-02-06 Thread Achim Gratz
Erik Bray writes: > Assuming this looks good (feedback welcome) it might be nice to have > this patch included in the next release of the official OpenBLAS > package for Cygwin since its incompatibility with fork() has caused > problems in the past [1]. It would be vastly preferrable if OPenBLAS

Re: OpenBLAS patch for Cygwin

2018-02-06 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 6 15:15, Marco Atzeri wrote: > On 06/02/2018 13:10, Erik Bray wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Users/maintainers of OpenBLAS on Cygwin may be interested in this > > patch to improve support for fork(): > > https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/pull/1450 > > > > Assuming this looks good (feedback

Re: OpenBLAS patch for Cygwin

2018-02-06 Thread Marco Atzeri
On 06/02/2018 13:10, Erik Bray wrote: Hello, Users/maintainers of OpenBLAS on Cygwin may be interested in this patch to improve support for fork(): https://github.com/xianyi/OpenBLAS/pull/1450 Assuming this looks good (feedback welcome) it might be nice to have this patch included in the next