Re: Update request for rdiff-backup

2020-05-08 Thread David Rothenberger
On 5/7/2020 11:15 PM, Cygwin wrote: Based on my limited testing, 2.0.0-2 works fine with local directories. As far as i can tell it works at least as well as version 1.2.8-6. Thanks for testing. I'll promote 2.0.0-2. 2.0.0-2 does exhibit the same behavior for network shares.  I discovered,

Re: Re: Update request for rdiff-backup

2020-05-08 Thread Cygwin
>/BTW, I was playing around with rdiff-backup 1.2.8-6 a couple days ago, />/and while it seemed to work fine when the destination was on a local />/drive, I couldn't figure out how to get it to work when the destination />/is a network share If I specify the destination as

Re: Update request for rdiff-backup

2020-05-06 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2020-05-05 23:23, Cygwin wrote: >> The ssh, rsync, and most Unix remote access utilities use [[user@]host:]path; >> and rsync daemon processes and rdiff-backup use [[user]@host::]path specs or >> URIs; see: >> >> http://rdiff-backup.nongnu.org/rdiff-backup.1.html >> >>

Re: Re: Update request for rdiff-backup

2020-05-05 Thread Cygwin
The ssh, rsync, and most Unix remote access utilities use [[user@]host:]path; and rsync daemon processes and rdiff-backup use [[user]@host::]path specs or URIs; see: http://rdiff-backup.nongnu.org/rdiff-backup.1.html https://rdiff-backup.net/docs/examples.html -- Take care.

Re: Update request for rdiff-backup

2020-05-05 Thread David Rothenberger
On 5/4/2020 9:17 PM, Cygwin wrote: Thanks for doing the update David.  I upgraded to rdiff-backup-2.0.0-1 and found that running "rdiff-backup --help" produced    Exception 'name 'local' is not defined' raised of class '':       File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/rdiff_backup/Main.py",  

Re: Update request for rdiff-backup

2020-05-05 Thread Brian Inglis
On 2020-05-04 22:17, Cygwin wrote: >> On 4/28/2020 11:43 PM,qrasmfu...@snkmail.com  >>   >> wrote: >> >/Cygwin currently contains version 1.2.8-6 of rdiff-backup. Based on what I >> see at https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/releases, 1.2.8 is about >> 11

Re: Update request for rdiff-backup

2020-05-05 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Cygwin! > BTW, I was playing around with rdiff-backup 1.2.8-6 a couple days ago, > and while it seemed to work fine when the destination was on a local > drive, I couldn't figure out how to get it to work when the destination > is a network share If I specify the destination as >

Re: Re: Update request for rdiff-backup

2020-05-04 Thread Cygwin
On 4/28/2020 11:43 PM,qrasmfu...@snkmail.com wrote: >/Cygwin currently contains version 1.2.8-6 of rdiff-backup. Based on what I see at https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/releases, 1.2.8 is about 11 years old (you'll have to click "Show 7 other

Re: Update request for rdiff-backup

2020-05-04 Thread David Rothenberger
On 4/28/2020 11:43 PM, qrasmfu...@snkmail.com wrote: Cygwin currently contains version 1.2.8-6 of rdiff-backup. Based on what I see at https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/releases, 1.2.8 is about 11 years old (you'll have to click "Show 7 other tags), although it appears there were