On 09/10/2015 02:40 PM, David A Cobb wrote:
> I see the Git Repo for "the core Cygwin libraries and utilities (Cygwin
> and Newlib)" @ sourceware.com.
>
> I am looking at possible work within *COREUTILS*. Obviously, there are
> significant deltas /versus/ GNU Upstream.
> Can you point me to the
On 09/10/2015 05:20 PM, David A Cobb wrote:
>>> I am looking at possible work within *COREUTILS*. Obviously, there are
>>> significant deltas /versus/ GNU Upstream.
>>> Can you point me to the active repo for coreutils?
>>
>> http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/coreutils.html
>
> Yeah, Marco.
On 2015-09-10 19:31, Eric Blake wrote:
On 09/10/2015 05:20 PM, David A Cobb wrote:
Not a problem. My first patch to upstream coreutils was done exactly
in that manner.
And, suppose for the moment, some of the changes are only relevant to
the Windows platform. I don't (yet) know how much GNU
On 2015-09-10 17:03, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 10/09/2015 22:40, David A Cobb wrote:
I see the Git Repo for "the core Cygwin libraries and utilities (Cygwin
and Newlib)" @ sourceware.com.
I am looking at possible work within *COREUTILS*. Obviously, there are
significant deltas /versus/ GNU
I see the Git Repo for "the core Cygwin libraries and utilities (Cygwin
and Newlib)" @ sourceware.com.
I am looking at possible work within *COREUTILS*. Obviously, there are
significant deltas /versus/ GNU Upstream.
Can you point me to the active repo for coreutils?
Just to save net
On 10/09/2015 22:40, David A Cobb wrote:
I see the Git Repo for "the core Cygwin libraries and utilities (Cygwin
and Newlib)" @ sourceware.com.
I am looking at possible work within *COREUTILS*. Obviously, there are
significant deltas /versus/ GNU Upstream.
Can you point me to the active repo
6 matches
Mail list logo
