On 25 Nov, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I can report that the problem is slightly improved in the current
release of setup,
Er, there hasn't been any release of setup since the original reports.
The last release was on April 25, 2004.
Sorry, I jumped to a conclusion. I was
Is this just a local problem here, do you think?
Other people are, somehow, still able to install Cygwin these days?
Any idea how they do it?
I guess posts of the style Well, I do this are not very welcome on the
grounds of volume and non- generalisability. But since you ask:
1. I always do a
On 25 Nov, fergus wrote:
5. If you try installing in two stages (i - the default Base installation,
then ii - the rest) then, in my experience anyway, on three machines as
described above, the whole thing goes through like a dream.
Ah! Thanks, Fergus, I'll give that a try. I assume you
I assume you mean you just install Default
then run setup a 2nd time, choosing All?
Exactly.
Fergus
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On 25 Nov, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I assume you mean you just install Default
then run setup a 2nd time, choosing All?
Exactly.
Many thanks, Fergus. Knowing that, I can add it to our Cygwin
automated installation process.
luke
--
Unsubscribe info:
Some weeks ago, I seconded a report that Cygwin wasn't releasing
handles, causing some machines to thrash to death and the installation
to fail.
I can report that the problem is slightly improved in the current
release of setup, but I think there are still some leaks as it is
currently sitting at
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 05:07:33PM +1100, Luke Kendall wrote:
Some weeks ago, I seconded a report that Cygwin wasn't releasing
handles, causing some machines to thrash to death and the installation
to fail.
I can report that the problem is slightly improved in the current
release of setup,
Er,
7 matches
Mail list logo
