On 8/3/2015 12:00 PM, steppnav wrote:
I'm attempting to remove texlive because it's existence makes it impossible
to completely remove X Windows components. I've manually ensured that all
things dependent on it have been marked for uninstall. It ends up in a
catch 22 style circular, self-refere
On 8/3/2015 6:00 PM, steppnav wrote:
I'm attempting to remove texlive because it's existence makes it impossible
to completely remove X Windows components. I've manually ensured that all
things dependent on it have been marked for uninstall. It ends up in a
catch 22 style circular, self-referen
don't know what
percentage of cygwinidos use teX stuff, but it MUST be a serious minority.
Could someone come up with a solvent for this teXSuperGlue?
--
View this message in context:
http://cygwin.1069669.n5.nabble.com/Unwanted-texlive-invasion-tp93047p120277.html
Sent from the Cygwin list mai
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:34:31PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>On 26/09/2012 2:32 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>>> On 26/09/2012 2:17 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:13:20PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2
On 26/09/2012 2:32 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 26/09/2012 2:17 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:13:20PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:03
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:29:00PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>On 26/09/2012 2:17 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:13:20PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:03:46AM -0700, Wynfield Henm
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> On 26/09/2012 2:17 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:13:20PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:03:46AM -0700, Wynfield
On 26/09/2012 2:17 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:13:20PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:03:46AM -0700, Wynfield Henman wrote:
In my humble opinion cygwin should be open to improvement an
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 02:13:20PM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:03:46AM -0700, Wynfield Henman wrote:
>>> In my humble opinion cygwin should be open to improvement and, we
>>>should keep cygwin's purpose as a bas
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:03:46AM -0700, Wynfield Henman wrote:
>> In my humble opinion cygwin should be open to improvement and, we
>>should keep cygwin's purpose as a base system, which is as full, and
>>as easy, and as close to a *nix
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 09:03:46AM -0700, Wynfield Henman wrote:
> In my humble opinion cygwin should be open to improvement and, we
>should keep cygwin's purpose as a base system, which is as full, and
>as easy, and as close to a *nix environment as possible.
And the wonder of open source is that
Fergus writes:
> Another trick/ fix/ workaround would be to go into
> /etc/setup/installed.db and edit it to show you've got texlive
> texlive-20120628-1.tar.bz2 0 and maybe texlive-collection-basic
> texlive-collection-basic-20120628-2.tar.bz2 0 (even though you
> haven't). There may be others but
In my humble opinion cygwin should be open to improvement and, we
should keep cygwin's purpose as a base system, which is as full, and
as easy, and as close to a *nix environment as possible.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
. snipped
>
>> I don't agree. The solution sh
>> .. it's a pain to have to continually go in and select [skip] for
each one and the select
>> yes I don't want these, every time I want to update other packages.
Another trick/ fix/ workaround would be to go into
/etc/setup/installed.db and edit it to show you've got
texlive texlive-20120628
Ken Brown cornell.edu> writes:
> This dependency is created by cygport. It's of course up to the gnuplot
> maintainer (Volker Zell) whether or not he wants to override it, but I
> can explain the rationale.
[...]
Until someone ports zypper or aptitude to Cygwin which can deal with soft
requir
On 25/09/2012 5:20 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
[Please don't top-post.]
On 9/25/2012 2:10 PM, Wynfield Henman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 9/25/2012 11:41 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upgrade a set of existing cygwin packages, and texlive
suddenly w
[Please don't top-post.]
On 9/25/2012 2:10 PM, Wynfield Henman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 9/25/2012 11:41 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upgrade a set of existing cygwin packages, and texlive
suddenly wants to install itself, apparently due to
I don't agree. The solution should not be to install an unnecessary
package and waste space and complicate by having to check order in the
PATH variable.
It would be better that a.) installation scripts check for the
existence of the necessary commands first and not brute force the
installation o
On 9/25/2012 11:41 AM, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to upgrade a set of existing cygwin packages, and texlive
suddenly wants to install itself, apparently due to a new dependency
from gnuplot. Is this really necessary?
This dependency is created by cygport. It's of course up to the
Hi all,
I'm trying to upgrade a set of existing cygwin packages, and texlive
suddenly wants to install itself, apparently due to a new dependency
from gnuplot. Is this really necessary?
Ryan
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/f
20 matches
Mail list logo
