Ken Brown kbr...@cornell.edu writes:
Now that that's fixed, it still says:
This is GNU Emacs 23.2.1
of 2010-08-16
I assume that's the new version, why does it still say 23.2.1?
The '.1' at the end is added by Emacs. I don't know why. This has
nothing to do with the fact that from
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
New releases of the emacs, emacs-X11, and emacs-el packages (23.2-2) are now
available as experimental packages. These are rebuilds of the 23.2-1
packages, with D-BUS support. You will need to install libdbus1_3 in order
to run the new
On 8/26/2010 8:51 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
New releases of the emacs, emacs-X11, and emacs-el packages (23.2-2) are now
available as experimental packages. These are rebuilds of the 23.2-1
packages, with D-BUS support. You will need to
New releases of the emacs, emacs-X11, and emacs-el packages (23.2-2) are
now available as experimental packages. These are rebuilds of the
23.2-1 packages, with D-BUS support. You will need to install
libdbus1_3 in order to run the new binaries. Please report any
regressions. If nothing
New releases of the emacs, emacs-X11, and emacs-el packages (23.2-2) are
now available as experimental packages. These are rebuilds of the
23.2-1 packages, with D-BUS support. You will need to install
libdbus1_3 in order to run the new binaries. Please report any
regressions. If nothing
5 matches
Mail list logo
