Thanks. I seemingly compiled gcc 3.4 20040310 successfully, once I had
installed bison and flex into cygwin. I'm going to try the decisive test
tonight which will be to rename all the g++ files other than the one in
gcc_34 directory, compile a C++ program, then rename the cygwin1.dll to
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:49:20AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. I seemingly compiled gcc 3.4 20040310 successfully, once I had
installed bison and flex into cygwin. I'm going to try the decisive test
tonight which will be to rename all the g++ files other than the one in
gcc_34
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 08:21:27PM -, Ben Taylor wrote:
I posted a message to 'google groups' and it didn't get any
replies in there. But then I started getting emails from you, so I thought
that the list was an email-based thing.
google groups has (in my experience) a lag time of up to 2
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 07:32:56AM -, Ben Taylor wrote:
I tried building 3.3.3 using 3.3.1, which didn't work when doing 'make
bootstrap'. But then I did a successful 'make bootstrap' of 3.3.2
using 3.3.1. The bootstrapped 3.3.2 works fine, and claims to have
been compiled by itself not
want to.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 March 2004 02:11
To: Ben Taylor; Cygwin List
Subject: RE: Using gcc 3.3.3
'man patch'.
But according to Chris, who knows more about Cygwin's gcc than I do,
-mno-cygwin should be configurable
: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 March 2004 16:13
To: Ben Taylor; Cygwin List
Subject: RE: Using gcc 3.3.3
At 02:32 AM 3/15/2004, you wrote:
Thanks
I tried building 3.3.3 using 3.3.1, which didn't work when doing 'make
bootstrap'. But then I did a successful 'make bootstrap
Oh right! OK, sorry - I didn't know there was a mailing list. I was under
the impression that you just sent an email to cygwin and somebody at cygwin
who knew the works picked it up, and it went on the mailing list so it came
up in searches as a by-product of that. I thought that all message
email address to be something cryptic to make sure spammers don't pick up my
ACTUAL email address?)
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 March 2004 16:13
To: Ben Taylor; Cygwin List
Subject: RE: Using gcc 3.3.3
At 02:32 AM 3/15/2004, you wrote
Hi
I have got Cygwin running on my windows XP pc, using gcc 3.3.1. I downloaded
gcc 3.3.3 release, and managed to build it, however when I tried to compile
a windows application using it it compiled ok but gave a linker error
'couldn't find crt2.o'. It gave this error when I was trying to compile
At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote:
Hi
I have got Cygwin running on my windows XP pc, using gcc 3.3.1. I downloaded
gcc 3.3.3 release, and managed to build it, however when I tried to compile
a windows application using it it compiled ok but gave a linker error
'couldn't find crt2.o'. It gave this
?
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2004 18:59
To: Ben Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using gcc 3.3.3
At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote:
Hi
I have got Cygwin running on my windows XP pc, using gcc 3.3.1.
I downloaded
gcc 3.3.3 release
How do I apply patches to my existing Cygwin installation?
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2004 18:59
To: Ben Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using gcc 3.3.3
At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote:
Hi
I have got Cygwin running
place. Why then is that, does it require
some unix based functionality that only cygwin provides to a windows pc?
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2004 18:59
To: Ben Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using gcc 3.3.3
At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 01:59:13PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote:
At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote:
Hi
I have got Cygwin running on my windows XP pc, using gcc 3.3.1. I
downloaded gcc 3.3.3 release, and managed to build it, however when I
tried to compile a windows application using it it compiled ok
3/14/2004, you wrote:
How do I apply patches to my existing Cygwin installation?
-Original Message-
From: Larry Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 14 March 2004 18:59
To: Ben Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Using gcc 3.3.3
At 09:50 AM 3/14/2004, you wrote:
Hi
I have
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 09:11:09PM -0500, Larry Hall wrote:
'man patch'.
But according to Chris, who knows more about Cygwin's gcc than I do,
-mno-cygwin should be configurable with vanilla gcc sources. So, if
you're having difficulty with your locally built gcc/g++, you'll need
to figure out
March 2004 02:11
To: Ben Taylor; Cygwin List
Subject: RE: Using gcc 3.3.3
'man patch'.
But according to Chris, who knows more about Cygwin's gcc than I do,
-mno-cygwin should be configurable with vanilla gcc sources. So, if
you're having difficulty with your locally built gcc/g++, you'll
17 matches
Mail list logo