On Oct 5 17:46, Yaakov S wrote:
On 05/10/2009 13:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
--- sys.c.ORIG 2009-10-05 19:23:58.0 +0200
+++ sys.c2009-10-05 19:18:34.0 +0200
@@ -408,7 +408,11 @@ openTty(char *line)
int rc;
int tty = -1;
+#ifdef __CYGWIN__
+tty =
On Oct 4 17:06, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
On 10/4/2009 1:52 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Stracing shows that luit is called with `luit -argv0 -tcsh', but nowhere
in the strace tcsh is actually started. Rather, it looks like luit
starts /bin/sh with argv[0] set to -tcsh instead.
Interesting.
2009/10/5 Corinna Vinschen:
There's a difference, though, when starting xterm via the `run -p xterm
-ls' shortcut. With Cygwin -61, xterm just starts tcsh and it works,
with Cygwin -62, xterm tries to start the shell via luit, and that
fails. If luit is missing on the system (renamed), xterm
On 05/10/2009 11:30, Fergus wrote:
The only difference is the Cygwin version. -61 works, -62 hangs.
Likewise.
But this is not the same problem. Being unable to start the Xserver
is not the same as being unable to start an Xterm.
With everything up to date (cygwin, luit, xorg-server, ...
On Oct 5 10:20, Andy Koppe wrote:
2009/10/5 Corinna Vinschen:
There's a difference, though, when starting xterm via the `run -p xterm
-ls' shortcut. With Cygwin -61, xterm just starts tcsh and it works,
with Cygwin -62, xterm tries to start the shell via luit, and that
fails. If luit
On Oct 5 20:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Unfortunately, luit has no alternative way to make the new tty the
controlling tty. What we need is a patch like this in luit:
--- sys.c.ORIG2009-10-05 19:23:58.0 +0200
+++ sys.c 2009-10-05 19:18:34.0 +0200
@@ -408,7
I start my xterms this way:
xterm EXEC xterm -e /usr/bin/tcsh
Is there an inherent problem with this?
- Jim
--
Jim Reisert AD1C, jjreis...@alum.mit.edu, http://www.ad1c.us
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
On 05/10/2009 13:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
And here's the problem. Cygwin doesn't have TIOCSCTTY, and the only way
to make a terminal a controlling tty in Cygwin is to call open() on it,
which tcsh misses to do. Bash, however, calls open(/dev/tty, O_RDWR),
so bash doesn't have this problem.
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 05:46:21PM -0500, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On 05/10/2009 13:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
And here's the problem. Cygwin doesn't have TIOCSCTTY, and the only way
to make a terminal a controlling tty in Cygwin is to call open() on it,
which tcsh misses to do. Bash,
The only difference is the Cygwin version. -61 works, -62 hangs.
Likewise. With everything up to date (cygwin, luit, xorg-server, ... --
see attached cygwin.srv) the command
~ run XWin -nolisten local -multiwindow
fails with an instruction to view /var/log/XWin.0.log (attached) which
On Oct 4 11:44, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
Did you upgrade xorg-server at the same time? Maybe your problem is caused
by the change in system.XWinrc that I reported yesterday:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2009-10/msg00023.html
I already had the latest Xorg server. The only
On 10/4/2009 1:52 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Stracing shows that luit is called with `luit -argv0 -tcsh', but nowhere
in the strace tcsh is actually started. Rather, it looks like luit
starts /bin/sh with argv[0] set to -tcsh instead.
Interesting. When I was experimenting with -62, I
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 jjr 1.7.0(0.214/5/3) 2009-10-03 14:33 i686 Cygwin
I can start X-windows but can't start an xterm by right-clicking on the
X icon in my system tray. I get the window but it hangs (empty). I
have moved my .cshrc file out of the way. My default shell is tcsh.
I've also
On 10/4/2009 12:39 PM, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
CYGWIN_NT-5.1 jjr 1.7.0(0.214/5/3) 2009-10-03 14:33 i686 Cygwin
I can start X-windows but can't start an xterm by right-clicking on the
X icon in my system tray. I get the window but it hangs (empty). I
have moved my .cshrc file out of the
Did you upgrade xorg-server at the same time? Maybe your problem is caused by
the change in system.XWinrc that I reported yesterday:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2009-10/msg00023.html
I already had the latest Xorg server. The only difference is the
Cygwin version. -61 works, -62
On Oct 4 11:44, Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
Did you upgrade xorg-server at the same time? Maybe your problem is caused
by the change in system.XWinrc that I reported yesterday:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-xfree/2009-10/msg00023.html
I already had the latest Xorg server. The only
On 10/4/2009 1:52 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Stracing shows that luit is called with `luit -argv0 -tcsh', but nowhere
in the strace tcsh is actually started. Rather, it looks like luit
starts /bin/sh with argv[0] set to -tcsh instead.
Interesting. When I was experimenting with -62, I
17 matches
Mail list logo
