Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict (fixed in snapshot?)

2004-10-20 Thread Rolf Campbell
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:26:58AM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote: An rsync session that consistantly works on the Oct 7 snapshot fails consistantly on the Oct 10 snapshot. Try it with the October 20 snapshot. I had the same problem with rsync (although I would have sworn th

Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict (fixed in snapshot?)

2004-10-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:26:58AM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote: >An rsync session that consistantly works on the Oct 7 snapshot fails >consistantly on the Oct 10 snapshot. Try it with the October 20 snapshot. I had the same problem with rsync (although I would have sworn that I tested it). It se

Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict (fixed in snapshot?)

2004-10-18 Thread Rolf Campbell
Christopher Faylor wrote: For those who haven't been following along at home, it looks like a change I just made to select() may solve the dreaded "slows down to a crawl with Symantec AntiVirus" problem. This may also improve the performance of things that use sockets slightly. So, I'd appreciate r

Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict (fixed in snapshot?)

2004-10-14 Thread Owen Rees
--On 11 October 2004 00:06 -0400 Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So, I'd appreciate reports on the latest snapshot. Does it fix any problems? Cause any problems? No change? I have XP Pro and Symantec AV - the 20041010 snapshot fixes the slowness I was having with emacs/X locally

Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict (fixed in snapshot?)

2004-10-12 Thread Jack Tanner
Christopher Faylor wrote: For those who haven't been following along at home, it looks like a change I just made to select() may solve the dreaded "slows down to a crawl with Symantec AntiVirus" problem. This may also improve the performance of things that use sockets slightly. So, I'd appreciate r

RE: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict (fixed in snapshot?)

2004-10-10 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict (fixed in snapshot?) > > On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:33:00PM -0400, Philip Gladstone wrote: > >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>Ok. I've changed the algorithm in select. It only opens a DGRAM > >>socket now, one time per thread.

Re: cygwin/x symantec antivirus conflict (fixed in snapshot?)

2004-10-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 11:33:00PM -0400, Philip Gladstone wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >>Ok. I've changed the algorithm in select. It only opens a DGRAM >>socket now, one time per thread. It uses this to terminate the socket >>thread, if necessary. This socket is never closed until the th