On 17/04/2010 21:32, Paul Bibbings wrote:
The .dlls in question are:
21:10:29 Paul bibbi...@jijou
~ $ls -l /opt/gcc-4.5.0/bin | grep dll
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 437743 Apr 15 09:08 cyggcc_s-1.dll
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 271146 Apr 15 09:08 cyggomp-1.dll
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 55679
Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com writes:
On 17/04/2010 21:32, Paul Bibbings wrote:
The .dlls in question are:
21:10:29 Paul bibbi...@jijou
~ $ls -l /opt/gcc-4.5.0/bin | grep dll
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 437743 Apr 15 09:08 cyggcc_s-1.dll
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ... 271146 Apr 15
On 20/04/2010 20:28, Paul Bibbings wrote:
(BTW. I'm guessing by That'd be my fault that you're working on gcc
upstream?)
I certainly am; my long-term goal is a) to synchronize upstream and
downstream so that in the end there are no cygwin-specific patches needed and
anyone can just build
Dave Korn dave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com writes:
On 20/04/2010 20:28, Paul Bibbings wrote:
(BTW. I'm guessing by That'd be my fault that you're working on gcc
upstream?)
I certainly am; my long-term goal is a) to synchronize upstream and
downstream so that in the end there are no
Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@verizon.net writes:
I have not had any problems building with Cygwin 1.7 on WinNT or Win7.
You do have to make sure you have the mpc complex math library
installed. Other than that I have had no problems.
Jerry
I've had no problems with the build itself, as far as I
Paul Bibbings wrote:
Whilst I do use the versions of gcc available as Cygwin packages, I have
also successfully built from source and used other versions. Most
recently I have added gcc-4.4.1, 4.4.3 and a 4.5.0 snapshot (end of Feb
2010). I configure them to build and install in
Whilst I do use the versions of gcc available as Cygwin packages, I have
also successfully built from source and used other versions. Most
recently I have added gcc-4.4.1, 4.4.3 and a 4.5.0 snapshot (end of Feb
2010). I configure them to build and install in /opt/gcc-{version}. I
then
On 4/15/2010 2:26 PM, Paul Bibbings wrote:
Can I, then, do the same with the .dlls in question? Is it possible,
for instance, for .dlls to be loadable via symlinks under Cygwin?
No. The Windows loader does not recognize Cygwin symlinks. Actually,
nothing in Windows does. ;-)
--
Larry Hall
Larry Hall (Cygwin) reply...@cygwin.com writes:
On 4/15/2010 2:26 PM, Paul Bibbings wrote:
Can I, then, do the same with the .dlls in question? Is it possible,
for instance, for .dlls to be loadable via symlinks under Cygwin?
No. The Windows loader does not recognize Cygwin symlinks.
9 matches
Mail list logo