More than 2600 iterations. I'd say this snapshot doesn't have this
particular bug.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-si
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Feb 1 11:44, Kevin Layer wrote:
>> > Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> >
>> > >> On 1/30/2012 5:53 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
>> > >> > Well over 200 clones with no error with the stock 1.7.9 cygwin1.dll,
>> > >> > changing nothing else on the machine.
>> > >>
>>
On Feb 1 11:44, Kevin Layer wrote:
> Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>
> >> On 1/30/2012 5:53 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
> >> > Well over 200 clones with no error with the stock 1.7.9 cygwin1.dll,
> >> > changing nothing else on the machine.
> >>
> >> Can you check for the most recent snapsho
On 2/1/2012 2:44 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 1/30/2012 5:53 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
>> > Well over 200 clones with no error with the stock 1.7.9 cygwin1.dll,
>> > changing nothing else on the machine.
>>
>> Can you check for the most recent snap
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 1/30/2012 5:53 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
>> > Well over 200 clones with no error with the stock 1.7.9 cygwin1.dll,
>> > changing nothing else on the machine.
>>
>> Can you check for the most recent snapshot that does work for you?
It took a while, but
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 1/30/2012 5:53 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
>> > Well over 200 clones with no error with the stock 1.7.9 cygwin1.dll,
>> > changing nothing else on the machine.
>>
>> Can you check for the most recent snapshot that does work for you?
It took a while, but it works in 11
On 1/30/2012 5:53 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
Well over 200 clones with no error with the stock 1.7.9 cygwin1.dll,
changing nothing else on the machine.
Can you check for the most recent snapshot that does work for you?
--
Larry
_
I swapped back in the 1/23 cygwin1.dll and ran the test. It failed on
the first clone.
I'm done with my testing. Let me know if there's something else you
want done.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: ht
Well over 200 clones with no error with the stock 1.7.9 cygwin1.dll,
changing nothing else on the machine.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwi
I already got through one iteration of cloning all 52 repos, and I
wasn't able to do that with the 1/23 snapshot in place.
I'll keep running it, in a loop, to see if I ever get a failure.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Docu
I've reverted the cygwin1.dll to the released 1.7.9 version. I will
do a bunch of testing to see if I get clone failures, and report back.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Un
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:05:46AM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
>> >Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >>> Is this new behavior just seen with this snapshot or is it something you
>> >>> noticed in 1.7.9? If you've just seen it in the latest snapshot it
>> >>> would be useful
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:05:46AM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> Is this new behavior just seen with this snapshot or is it something you
>>> noticed in 1.7.9? If you've just seen it in the latest snapshot it
>>> would be useful (as I've previously pleaded) to know in wh
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 02:32:54PM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
>> >I don't know what happened to the email in transit, but much
>> >information at the head of the email was chopped off. From my outbox,
>> >here's the missing bit:
>> >
>> >*
>> >
>> >This
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
>> On 1/27/2012 5:32 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
>> > This is the failure mode:
>> >
>> > $ rm -fr test; git clone git:/repo/git/composer test
>> > Cloning into test...
>> > fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
>> > fatal: early EOF
>> > fatal: index-pack failed
>>
>>
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 02:32:54PM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
>I don't know what happened to the email in transit, but much
>information at the head of the email was chopped off. From my outbox,
>here's the missing bit:
>
>*
>
>This is the failure mode:
>
>$ rm -fr test; git clone g
On 1/27/2012 5:32 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
This is the failure mode:
$ rm -fr test; git clone git:/repo/git/composer test
Cloning into test...
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
fatal: early EOF
fatal: index-pack failed
Is this failure new or was it happening before this snapshot too?
I don't know what happened to the email in transit, but much
information at the head of the email was chopped off. From my outbox,
here's the missing bit:
*
This is the failure mode:
$ rm -fr test; git clone git:/repo/git/composer test
Cloning into test...
fatal: The remote end
Cygwin Configuration Diagnostics
Current System Time: Fri Jan 27 14:24:45 2012
Windows 7 Ultimate Ver 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
Running under WOW64 on AMD64
Path: C:\cygwin\usr\local\bin
C:\cygwin\bin
C:\Perl64\site\bin
C:\Perl64\bin
.
C:\bin
C:\sbin
C:\cygwin\bin
C:\cygwin\usr\loca
19 matches
Mail list logo
