On 9/13/2011 13:38, Larson, Donald (Don) wrote:
I understand su does not work – answer use ssh. SSHD cannot start
because user sshd cannot login. I run login sshd type in the
password and then I get the message.
What you're saying is that you want a way to log in as another user as
one would
On 14/09/2011 11:08 AM, Jeremy Bopp wrote:
On 9/13/2011 13:38, Larson, Donald (Don) wrote:
I understand su does not work – answer use ssh. SSHD cannot start
because user sshd cannot login. I run login sshd type in the
password and then I get the message.
What you're saying is that you want a
On 9/14/2011 14:25, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Question: in my experience sshd will not allow connections to users who
have no password set, even when password-auth is not used. This happened
on my wife's laptop, for example, where I ended up having to create a
dummy user for myself that had a
Folks,
I have searched this and I see it has come up several times and I really don't
want to frustrate anyone, but I have read the messages and was not able to see
what the actual answer was.
I understand su does not work – answer use ssh. SSHD cannot start because
user sshd cannot login. I
On 9/13/2011 2:38 PM, Larson, Donald (Don) wrote:
Folks,
I have searched this and I see it has come up several times and I really
don't want to frustrate anyone, but I have read the messages and was not
able to see what the actual answer was.
I understand su does not work – answer use ssh. SSHD
Andrew,
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 02:32:07PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Jason Tishler wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:34:42AM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Please do not email me directly - keep it only on the list.
Hmm...didn't you just do a reply all? Or, was that to make a point?
Jason Tishler wrote:
Andrew,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:34:42AM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Please do not email me directly - keep it only on the list.
Hmm...didn't you just do a reply all? Or, was that to make a point?
You emailed me. I emailed you back. AND I put it back to the
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 09:01:45AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These user rights are by default only given to SYSTEM regardless
of the NT version. XP differs only by requiring less of these
user rights in one of the needed system calls.
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:56:07PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
OK then, seems to me that su might be implementable by using a service
that runs as SYSTEM and takes requests to switch user from user A to
user B. Possible?
Sure. It's exactly the way the user switch is implemented in 2K/XP.
Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rights (whatever set of rights that is), or not. Is this another toy
operating system after all?
Yes and no. Fact is, the kernel and the libraries are a real
NT system. But the system tools don't allow you to do all that
stuff.
Ok. So maybe
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:43:02AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Yes and no. Fact is, the kernel and the libraries are a real
NT system. But the system tools don't allow you to do all that
stuff.
Ok. So maybe with the right tools (or /proc/registry tweaking), Home
Edition could be
Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have XP HE and XP Prof versions for testing purposes. The restrictions
in HE are really tricky. I tried even stuff as moving DLLs and MMC
snapins from Prof to HE but to no avail.
Ok, so they're really rather different, in distributed system
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 02:04:38PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Yes, Cygwin gives a lot more insight in permissions. It seems
however, that XP (HE) doesn't respect execute permissions on
directories, in some cases. Moreover, read and execute permissions in
/cygdrive/c seem to be granted
Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't understand your example. What's wrong? Hmm, ok, I assume
you expect a `Permission denied' when trying to ls 400/400, right?
Yes, sorry to be so implicit.
This is not HE specific, it's default for all NT versions. It's
a user right
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 01:56:07PM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
OK then, seems to me that su might be implementable by using a service
that runs as SYSTEM and takes requests to switch user from user A to
user B. Possible?
Sure. It's exactly the way the user
At 10:44 AM 3/7/2002, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
And rsh is a dangerous service anyway. If you don't want it,
just remove the matching line in /etc/inetd.conf and use ssh.
Ah but I *want* rsh. I just want it to work correctly. :-)
OK, that's fair. Sounds like you have your work cut out for you
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:44:22AM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Ah but I *want* rsh. I just want it to work correctly. :-)
Patches gratefully accepted.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer
Andrew,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:44:22AM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
And rsh is a dangerous service anyway. If you don't want it,
just remove the matching line in /etc/inetd.conf and use ssh.
Ah but I *want* rsh. I just want it to work correctly. :-)
Could this
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 12:29:11PM -0500, Jason Tishler wrote:
Andrew,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 07:44:22AM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
And rsh is a dangerous service anyway. If you don't want it,
just remove the matching line in /etc/inetd.conf and use ssh.
Andrew,
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 10:34:42AM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Please do not email me directly - keep it only on the list.
Hmm...didn't you just do a reply all? Or, was that to make a point?
Sorry, but hitting g is just more natural than hitting L for me.
If this is important to
in to this server!!!
fred@ABBICCI ~$ login root
Password:
Last login: Tue Mar 5 23:21:09 on tty2
Fanfare!!!
You are successfully logged in to this server!!!
login: no shell: /bin/bash: Permission denied
fred@ABBICCI ~$ ls -l /bin/bash.exe
-rwxr-xr-x1 Administ Geen
, thanks, you're right:
fred@ABBICCI ~$ login root
Password:
Last login: Tue Mar 5 23:27:42 on tty2
Fanfare!!!
You are successfully logged in to this server!!!
login: no shell: /bin/bash: Permission denied
fred@ABBICCI ~$ id
uid=1009(fred) gid=513(Geen)
groups=0
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:20:48AM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Hmm, so much for google. You adviced to use login before,
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-03/msg00337.html
have things changed since then?
No. Did you read that article carefully? I've wrote about
special user
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 12:53:33PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've wrote about special user rights needed...
Ok, so while using login instead of su is possible in some cases (it
seems windows xp is not one of them), easiest is using ssh.
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
No, it didn't work. `who' isn't the right way to get your current
user name, try `id'. Basically, login is doing the following:
execlp(pwd-pw_shell, tbuf, 0);
fprintf(stderr, login: no shell: );
perror(pwd-pw_shell);
exit(0);
So, if it couldn't
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:12:11AM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
You imply that somebody has the ability to change user context! If so
then who is that somebody (USER)?
I have to tell that each week (day?) again, apparently. It's SYSTEM.
It's my understanding that the only thing(s) that use
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 11:12:11AM -0800, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
You imply that somebody has the ability to change user context! If so
then who is that somebody (USER)?
I have to tell that each week (day?) again, apparently. It's SYSTEM.
Sorry, I saw that the
Peter Buckley wrote:
Regardless, to me it's still would be a large security hole if all one
needs to do is:
$ echo + ~/.rhosts
to be able to abuse rsh to do something under somebody else's user ID
is it not?
rsh is inherently insecure. Attempts to make it secure are not
Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These user rights are by default only given to SYSTEM regardless
of the NT version. XP differs only by requiring less of these
user rights in one of the needed system calls.
Ok, but I can't seem to add specific rights to users with this version
of
Mar 5 23:21:09 on tty2
Fanfare!!!
You are successfully logged in to this server!!!
login: no shell: /bin/bash: Permission denied
fred@ABBICCI ~$ ls -l /bin/bash.exe
-rwxr-xr-x1 Administ Geen 478720 Feb 19 19:14 /bin/bash.exe
fred@ABBICCI ~$ who
root tty2
30 matches
Mail list logo
