Re: ls -F // doesn't work

2004-12-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:10:49AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >If you don't see it in CVS, then it is still being worked on and asking >people for a work in progress and you don't want a work in progress. Oops. "If you see it in CVS, then it is still being worked on and you don't want a wor

Re: ls -F // doesn't work

2004-12-23 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 08:04:45AM -0700, Mark Paulus wrote: >On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:35:40 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >>While you're right, it's not a good thing that ls // returns these >>error messages. I found a buglet in Cygwin which results in scanning >>the root directory accidentall

Re: ls -F // doesn't work

2004-12-23 Thread Mark Paulus
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 11:35:40 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >While you're right, it's not a good thing that ls // returns these >error messages. I found a buglet in Cygwin which results in scanning >the root directory accidentally in this situation. For us non-informed, commercial developers,

Re: ls -F // doesn't work

2004-12-23 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 22 15:47, Andrew DeFaria wrote: > Mark Paulus wrote: > > >When I do an ls -F, I get expected results: > >$ ls -F / > >bin/ cygwin.bat* home/ run.groff tmp1/ xfer/ > >cron_diagnose.sh* cygwin.ico* lib/ sbin/ usr/ > >cygdeb/ etc/ mountem* tmp/ var/ > > > >However, when I do ls -F //, then I g

Re: ls -F // doesn't work

2004-12-22 Thread Andrew DeFaria
Mark Paulus wrote: When I do an ls -F, I get expected results: $ ls -F / bin/ cygwin.bat* home/ run.groff tmp1/ xfer/ cron_diagnose.sh* cygwin.ico* lib/ sbin/ usr/ cygdeb/ etc/ mountem* tmp/ var/ However, when I do ls -F //, then I get bad results: $ ls -F // ls: //bin: No such file or directory ls

ls -F // doesn't work

2004-12-22 Thread Mark Paulus
When I do an ls -F, I get expected results: $ ls -F / bin/ cygwin.bat* home/ run.groff tmp1/ xfer/ cron_diagnose.sh* cygwin.ico* lib/ sbin/ usr/ cygdeb/etc/ mountem* tmp/ var/ However, when I do ls -F //, then I get bad results: $ ls -F /