Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-13 Thread Reini Urban
Christopher Faylor schrieb: On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 03:08:44PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote: Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you asked for development

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 03:08:44PM +0100, Reini Urban wrote: >Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: >>Christopher Faylor wrote: >>>On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >>> Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you asked for development packages,

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-13 Thread Reini Urban
Gerrit P. Haase schrieb: Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you asked for development packages, these all are basic libraries or compilers for developers. And, yet, I'm a dev

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you asked for development packages, these all are basic libraries or compilers for developers. And, yet, I'm a developer, and I don't have o

RE: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Harig, Mark
> > > screen > > > > In some cases we have packages which offer > similar-but-not-identical behavior > > but in some cases (ping, screen) we don't have anything > close, AFAIK. > > I've been running screen on cygwin for years - originally using > http://dellelce.com/code/screen/ - though it wa

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 11:50:19PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Maybe these are not standard packages for administrators, but since you >asked for development packages, these all are basic libraries or >compilers for developers. And, yet, I'm a developer, and I don't have one of those libraries

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:41:23PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: bind I have bind here, please someone grab it and make a package from this initial port, the server needs more testing: http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ coreutils mailx p

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:41:23PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: bind I have bind here, please someone grab it and make a package from this initial port, the server needs more testing: http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ coreutils mailx p

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 04:41:23PM +0100, Gerrit P. Haase wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: > >>bind > >I have bind here, please someone grab it and make a package from this >initial port, the server needs more testing: > http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ > >>coreutils >>mailx >>ping >>se

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Christopher Faylor wrote: bind I have bind here, please someone grab it and make a package from this initial port, the server needs more testing: http://anfaenger.de/cygwin/DNS/bind-9.2.2/ coreutils mailx ping sendmail screen In some cases we have packages which offer similar-but-not-identical be

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-11-12 Thread Mark Ord
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes: > A line, since gmane *thinks* I'm top posting. I found this thread looking for any info on starting bind successfully as a service (anyone?), hence the delayed reply... > This is an off-the-top-of-my-head list of standard packages which are missing > from

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-10-20 Thread Ariel Burbaickij
Ok. That is fine. I got xmove running on cygwin, so if you want I can contribute the executable and/or slighlty modified makefile if required. It would be great if we could port xmx to cygwin On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 14:15:43 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED M

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-10-19 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ariel Burbaickij wrote: | script I have an implementation of script, based on a message to this list a few years ago, available on my project webpage: http://sourceforge.net/projects/cygwin-ports/ It works fine for me. Seeing as this is among the Frequ

Re: packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-10-19 Thread Ariel Burbaickij
script On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 13:22:54 -0400, Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is an off-the-top-of-my-head list of standard packages which are missing > from the cygwin distribution: > > bind > coreutils > mailx > ping > sendmail > screen > > In some cases we have packages whi

packages that should be in the cygwin distribution but aren't

2004-10-19 Thread Christopher Faylor
This is an off-the-top-of-my-head list of standard packages which are missing from the cygwin distribution: bind coreutils mailx ping sendmail screen In some cases we have packages which offer similar-but-not-identical behavior but in some cases (ping, screen) we don't have anything close, AFAIK.