Larry Hall (Cygwin) writes:
Does this help?
Thanks, I've been reading this before. Tentatively I concluded that all
Cygwin executables should have the +tsaware set, I just wanted to make
sure that there aren't some that I would break if I do this.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305
On Apr 27 07:57, Achim Gratz wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) writes:
Does this help?
Thanks, I've been reading this before. Tentatively I concluded that all
Cygwin executables should have the +tsaware set, I just wanted to make
sure that there aren't some that I would break if I do this.
To
Corinna Vinschen corinna-cygwin at cygwin.com writes:
So, adding the tsaware flag to Cygwin executables might not help, but
should never hurt.
Thanks. So I'll extend my installer to sweep all executables and add +tsaware.
Regards,
Achim.
--
Problem reports:
What is peflags trying to tell me with this warning, which is only present when
the -v switch is in effect?
ash -c PATH=/bin peflags -t -d -v /usr/lib/zsh/4.3.12/zsh/zutil.dll
Warning: file is non-executable but has tsaware set
(/usr/lib/zsh/4.3.12/zsh/zutil.dll).
On Apr 26 15:16, Achim Gratz wrote:
What is peflags trying to tell me with this warning, which is only present
when
the -v switch is in effect?
ash -c PATH=/bin peflags -t -d -v /usr/lib/zsh/4.3.12/zsh/zutil.dll
Warning: file is non-executable but has tsaware set
Corinna Vinschen writes:
The warning might be a bit misleading. What it really tries to tell you
is that the file in question is not an executable (*.exe). The tsaware
flag has no meaning for DLLs, it's only evaluated in headers of
executables.
That explains a lot more than that warning
On 4/26/2012 4:28 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
The warning might be a bit misleading. What it really tries to tell you
is that the file in question is not an executable (*.exe). The tsaware
flag has no meaning for DLLs, it's only evaluated in headers of
executables.
That
7 matches
Mail list logo
