On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:53:17PM -0400, Martin Gainty wrote:
+1 for ant support
Now that ant has support for cc I dont see the use for archaic makefiles
I don't know what +1 is supposed to signify but, assuming that this is
a vote, I have to remind you that this is not a voting type of
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote:
[snip]
P.S.: maybe it's just that I'm using FreeBSD more and more, but its
ports system seems to me better each time I think of it (it is a
collection of some 8000 Makefiles that contains instruction to download
source form original website, apply
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:28:14AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote:
This reminds me that maybe it could be cool to have an install option
in type 2 packages that installs them directly, without bothering to
have a fake local setup.ini, starting setup,
+1 for ant support
Now that ant has support for cc I dont see the use for archaic makefiles
Martin
- Original Message -
From: Dario Alcocer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:35 PM
Subject: RPM support (was Re: qmail port successfull)
On Thu, May 29
Note about qmail distribution:
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
You are right, of course, it need to get him (professor Dan Bernstein)
approval.
To cgf:
Yes, I must forget about sharing Win32 binaries.
Sergey.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 06:56:04AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note about qmail distribution:
http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html
You are right, of course, it need to get him (professor Dan Bernstein)
approval.
To cgf:
Yes, I must forget about sharing Win32 binaries.
That's a really
Christopher Faylor wrote:
To cgf:
Yes, I must forget about sharing Win32 binaries.
That's a really regrettable outcome of the qmail license. Oh well.
cgf
As far as i remember some linux distro do have qmail in binary form...
they asked DJB and (as far as I remember) he added to the
Lapo Luchini wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
To cgf:
Yes, I must forget about sharing Win32 binaries.
That's a really regrettable outcome of the qmail license. Oh well.
What license? AFAICT there is no license, at most some webpages with DJB's
comments on software licenses (but no license).
8 matches
Mail list logo