Re: RPM support (was Re: qmail port successfull)

2003-05-31 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 07:53:17PM -0400, Martin Gainty wrote: +1 for ant support Now that ant has support for cc I dont see the use for archaic makefiles I don't know what +1 is supposed to signify but, assuming that this is a vote, I have to remind you that this is not a voting type of

Re: qmail port successfull

2003-05-30 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote: [snip] P.S.: maybe it's just that I'm using FreeBSD more and more, but its ports system seems to me better each time I think of it (it is a collection of some 8000 Makefiles that contains instruction to download source form original website, apply

RPM support (was Re: qmail port successfull)

2003-05-30 Thread Dario Alcocer
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 11:28:14AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 29 May 2003, Lapo Luchini wrote: This reminds me that maybe it could be cool to have an install option in type 2 packages that installs them directly, without bothering to have a fake local setup.ini, starting setup,

Re: RPM support (was Re: qmail port successfull)

2003-05-30 Thread Martin Gainty
+1 for ant support Now that ant has support for cc I dont see the use for archaic makefiles Martin - Original Message - From: Dario Alcocer [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 6:35 PM Subject: RPM support (was Re: qmail port successfull) On Thu, May 29

Re: qmail port successfull

2003-05-29 Thread linamat
Note about qmail distribution: http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html You are right, of course, it need to get him (professor Dan Bernstein) approval. To cgf: Yes, I must forget about sharing Win32 binaries. Sergey. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Re: qmail port successfull

2003-05-29 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 06:56:04AM +0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note about qmail distribution: http://cr.yp.to/qmail/dist.html You are right, of course, it need to get him (professor Dan Bernstein) approval. To cgf: Yes, I must forget about sharing Win32 binaries. That's a really

Re: qmail port successfull

2003-05-29 Thread Lapo Luchini
Christopher Faylor wrote: To cgf: Yes, I must forget about sharing Win32 binaries. That's a really regrettable outcome of the qmail license. Oh well. cgf As far as i remember some linux distro do have qmail in binary form... they asked DJB and (as far as I remember) he added to the

Re: qmail port successfull

2003-05-29 Thread Hack Kampbjorn
Lapo Luchini wrote: Christopher Faylor wrote: To cgf: Yes, I must forget about sharing Win32 binaries. That's a really regrettable outcome of the qmail license. Oh well. What license? AFAICT there is no license, at most some webpages with DJB's comments on software licenses (but no license).