squid 2.6 install deleted the existing /etc/squid.conf and
/etc/mime.conf, then put the default files from /etc/defaults to the new
location in /etc/squid/. Right, let's check our backups.
:), Leo
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cy
After upgrading to cygwin 1.5.25-7 I get error message
from BASH every time I want to run cygcheck:
$ cygcheck
BASH: ./cygcheck: Function not implemented
$ cygcheck -svr
BASH: ./cygcheck: Function not implemented
$ cygcheck --help
BASH: ./cygcheck: Function not implemented
So, I can not attach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to Alexey Lyubimov on 12/20/2007 6:38 AM:
> After upgrading to cygwin 1.5.25-7 I get error message
> from BASH every time I want to run cygcheck:
>
> $ cygcheck
> BASH: ./cygcheck: Function not implemented
Odd. Cygwin's bash does not usual
Connected via VPN to a Solaris server on which I have a shell account, I can
ftp okay, and can wget using the URL syntax
ftp://[username[:[EMAIL PROTECTED] However wput fails using the same
syntax. wget 1.10.2, wput 0.6.1.
1 > wget ftp://michael:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/foo.bar
--08:43:12-- ftp://m
Hi
New versions of 'dbX/libdbX-devel/libdbX/tcl-dbX/' have been uploaded to a
server near you.
Cygwin NEWS:
o Maintainer change
o Switched to cygport build framework
o Repackaged dbX,libdbX-devel and libdbX slightly
o Now using alternatives for choosing the different dbX versi
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION
===
Home page: http://bazaar-vcs.org/
License : GPL
Distributed version control system that is powerful, friendly, and
scalable implemented in Python.
- Just one .bzr directory at the top of the tree; it doesn't clutter
the tree or get in your face. No wier
Eric Blake wrote:
> Odd. Cygwin's bash does not usually capitalize it's name. You might have
That's a Win9x oddity.
> > The OS: Windows 98 SE
>
> Rather old; I hope you're aware that cygwin 1.7.0 won't run on your OS,
> and that, as bash maintainer, I no longer have access to Win98 to
> inves
On Dec 19, 2007 11:59 PM, Igor Peshansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, /dev/urandom certainly exists in Cygwin. I'm not a Ruby expert, but
> considering that adding a puts() before the file open seems to fix it, I'd
> look somewhere in the Ruby code. But you can try running the original
> un
Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) schrieb:
Reini Urban wrote:
And I have to add that packaging perl is really hard, because I haven't got yet
the chroot trick to work when packaging it.
Modules hardcode absolute paths and install into hardcoded places, so it had
has to be done into the live tree and picking
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:21:22 +0300,
"Mironov, Leonid {PBG}" wrote:
>squid 2.6 install deleted the existing /etc/squid.conf and
>/etc/mime.conf, then put the default files from /etc/defaults to the new
>location in /etc/squid/. Right, let's check our backups.
I think the only directory you can ha
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 06:15:11 -0800,
Brian Dessent wrote:
>Eric Blake wrote:
>
>> Odd. Cygwin's bash does not usually capitalize it's name. You might have
>
>That's a Win9x oddity.
>
>> > The OS: Windows 98 SE
>>
>> Rather old; I hope you're aware that cygwin 1.7.0 won't run on your OS,
>> and
On Dec 20, 2007 10:28 AM, Mike Boone wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 11:59 PM, Igor Peshansky wrote:
> > Well, /dev/urandom certainly exists in Cygwin. I'm not a Ruby expert, but
> > considering that adding a puts() before the file open seems to fix it, I'd
> > look somewhere in the Ruby code. But you
I have noted that the command
$ cygcheck -cv > check.out
creates the check.out file in DOS (CR+LF) style.
Is this correct?
Cheers,
Angelo.
---
http://www.webalice.it/angelo.graziosi
Facesti come quei che va di notte,
che porta il lume dietro e se' non giova,
ma dopo se' fa
On Dec 19, 2007 11:40 AM, Nimish Pachapurkar wrote:
> On Dec 19, 2007 9:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Dec 19 08:54, Nimish Pachapurkar wrote:
> > > On Dec 19, 2007 8:39 AM, Corinna Vinschen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I have 2K8 RC1 installed myself and I see these strange hangs, too
Hi Brian
Finally got a change to try this (sorry it tooks so long). It looks like it
does NOT work.
The fd returned from cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd() always returns
from the poll call with a POLLIN event even though no packets
are flowing on the network (and hence there should be no pcap
packe
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 04:04:11PM -0800, S A wrote:
>Hi Brian
>
>Finally got a change to try this (sorry it tooks so long). It looks like it
>does NOT work.
>
>The fd returned from cygwin_attach_handle_to_fd() always returns
>from the poll call with a POLLIN event even though no packets
>are flo
On Dec 20, 2007 4:29 PM, Frodak Baksik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Dec 20, 2007 10:28 AM, Mike Boone wrote:
> Can you access /dev/urandom outside of ruby? It might be a simpler
> check to ensure that /dev/urandom is working.
I ran all the commands you suggested with no problems.
The problem
OK, I modified the Rails source code to add the puts statement just
above the statement that reads from /dev/urandom. I then ran strace
again and looked for the relevant section of the output. I trimmed out
the leading numeric stuff so I could run a diff on them.
Here is the output of the failing
Hi
Please bear with me if this is a stupid question but I'm trying to setup a
telnet socket
in cygwin and then want to use a Windows wait semaphore
(WaitForMultipleObjects)
to combine it with a sleep for winpcap HANDLEs.
I thought I'd test this first though.
Does get_osfhandle() on a AF_I
On 20 December 2007 18:46, Jeff wrote:
> This is exactly why I have 'File Monitor' from Sysinternals on my
> system. Whenever I have an app that fails to start and produces some
> incomprehensible error message (relative to my setup, current state of
> my system, location of files, etc.), I run 'F
On 20 December 2007 22:41, Angelo Graziosi wrote:
> I have noted that the command
>
> $ cygcheck -cv > check.out
>
> creates the check.out file in DOS (CR+LF) style.
>
> Is this correct?
Same reason as strace, I would assume: it's a DOS-based program, not a cygwin
one.
cheers,
Dave Korn wrote:
> Same reason as strace, I would assume: it's a DOS-based program, not a
> cygwin one.
I think you mean "it's a MSVCRT-based program" since DOS hasn't existed
in Windows in the last approx. 7 years.
(And now if I could only get people to stop incorrectly referring to a
NT/2k/
22 matches
Mail list logo
