Hi y'all,
After brushing up on my C++, getting married, etc. etc. I decided to
check out the source of cygwin to see if there's anything I can do on
the work I kinda promised a while ago. Had to apply a little "patch" to
the CVSROOT though, so to help you incite others to help you, here's the
> On Sunday 17 Nov 02, Igor Pechtchanski writes:
> > On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> >
> > > Dennis Lubert wrote:
> > >
> > > > just saw the new cygwin release, and since I don't know who to ask, I
> > > > ask you ;) Is there any other shell, oder shell-like program I can use
> > > > cyg
On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Carlo Florendo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been using cygwin for 3 years now and last week, I downloaded the
> latest cygwin from one of the mirrors and everything in well except for one
> problem. I noticed that whenever I type 'ls -', the output gets delayed for
> a few second
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, David Starks-Browning wrote:
> On Sunday 17 Nov 02, Igor Pechtchanski writes:
> > On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> >
> > > Dennis Lubert wrote:
> > >
> > > > just saw the new cygwin release, and since I don't know who to ask, I
> > > > ask you ;) Is there any other s
Hello,
I've been using cygwin for 3 years now and last week, I downloaded the
latest cygwin from one of the mirrors and everything in well except for one
problem. I noticed that whenever I type 'ls -', the output gets delayed for
a few seconds. This never happened to me using the old cygwin. I
Digging around the gcc.gnu.org site,
came across PR 4764 in the bugs
database:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl
*Description:*
On Solaris 8, std::wstring is not available, because libstdc++/aclocal.m4
checks for too many functions
The followi
>Well the files are, of course, ftp.exe and telnet.exe.
>Cygwin's automagical .exe workarounds seems to not be working when going
>through a mount where there is no underlying directory.
>
>Max.
>
> Cygwin follows the Windows convention of using file file name suffix
> ".exe" for its binary execu
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 01:05:10AM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So, if you have a file called foo.exe 'ls -l foo' will work but
>> 'cat foo.exe' won't work.
>
>You mean 'cat foo', don't you?
Yes.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#u
Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:35:57AM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Cygwin follows the Windows convention of using file file name suffix
>>> ".exe" for its binary executable files. While Cygwin will locate
On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 12:35:57AM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Cygwin follows the Windows convention of using file file name suffix
>>".exe" for its binary executable files. While Cygwin will locate and
>>execute files files given only the base name (sa
Randall R Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cygwin follows the Windows convention of using file file name suffix
> ".exe" for its binary executable files. While Cygwin will locate and
> execute files files given only the base name (sans suffix), other
> uses ("cat," "less," or more apropos "nm,"
Fred,
Cygwin follows the Windows convention of using file file name suffix ".exe"
for its binary executable files. While Cygwin will locate and execute files
files given only the base name (sans suffix), other uses ("cat," "less," or
more apropos "nm," "size" or "file") demand the full file nam
Shing-Fat Fred Ma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I try to "ls" a file I know to be
> there, I'm told it isn't:
No, as you show below, ls works, less doesn't.
> $ cd /usr/bin
> $ ls -l ftp telnet
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 unknown unknown 57344 Jan 6 2002 ftp*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 unknow
Hi Danny,
Thanks for the hint. Does this mean that I need to rebuild libstc++?
My impression is that this is a bug: Either wchar_t is supported, or
it isn't, but that should be compile-error rather than link-error.
And also, since I've done a "full" Cygwin install, what more is needed
for wchar_t
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 07:33:18PM -0800, Andrew Lynch wrote:
> So I would like to know why is not minires a part of
> cygwin? There are numerous packages ported to cygwin
> using it, if I go by the cygwin mailing list. Is it
> just the lack of someone to package it or is it a
> policy issue?
He
Hi,
I'm using cygwin 1.3.15 in WinME:
Cygwin DLL version info:
DLL version: 1.3.15
DLL epoch: 19
When I try to "ls" a file I know to be
there, I'm told it isn't:
$ which ftp telnet
/usr/bin/ftp
/usr/bin/telnet
$ cd /usr/bin
$ ls -l ftp telnet
-r
gcc 3.2 string link problem
From: Nigel Stewart & Fiona Smith
To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:42:45 +1100
Subject: gcc 3.2 string link problem
===snip===
> $ g++ test.cpp
> /cygdrive/c/DOCUME~1/nigels/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccHP4AMl.o(.text+0x25):test.cpp: >
> undefined referenc
Hello all,
Having happily upgraded my Cygwin to include gcc 3.2, I've
encountered a show-stopper: The linker can't resolve symbols
involving wide C++ strings. Here is an example:
#include
#include
using namespace std;
int main(int argc,char *argv[])
{
std::string test;
}
-
On Mon, 2002-11-18 at 08:17, Yves Forkl wrote:
> In various versions of the libxml2/libxslt binaries, the executable
> "xsltproc" distributed with the latest libxslt package was compiled
> against an older version of libxml2 than the latest release currently
> distributed.
...
> To get xsltproc wor
In various versions of the libxml2/libxslt binaries, the executable
"xsltproc" distributed with the latest libxslt package was compiled
against an older version of libxml2 than the latest release currently
distributed.
>From the most recent Cygwin releases of libxml2/libxslt:
$ xsltproc -V
Using
On Sunday 17 Nov 02, Igor Pechtchanski writes:
> On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Lapo Luchini wrote:
>
> > Dennis Lubert wrote:
> >
> > > just saw the new cygwin release, and since I don't know who to ask, I
> > > ask you ;) Is there any other shell, oder shell-like program I can use
> > > cygwin with ? I us
Hello,
I am using cygwin 1.3.10 on win2k system. recently
while I try to write some file into a: using following
command: dd if=myfile of=a: bs=512 count=1, the
computer tried to write and then come back give me
error message: dd open "a:", Permission denied. I
switched to administrator account to
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 08:48:48PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 20:35, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> But newbies wouldn't know to run it.
>
>1) Link on the home page.
I don't think "Link on the home page" is ever a serious solution fo
Front page slashdot story:
http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/02/11/17/1648220.shtml?tid=125
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
***For those accustomed to setting up on Linux, you do not need to run
'configure' and 'gmake' to install PostgreSQL...Cygwin performs the install for you,
however it puts the executables in the /bin dir vs. the default PostgreSQL install dir
of /usr/local/pgsql. ***
On Sun, 17 Nov 2002, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> Dennis Lubert wrote:
>
> > just saw the new cygwin release, and since I don't know who to ask, I
> > ask you ;) Is there any other shell, oder shell-like program I can use
> > cygwin with ? I use is currently with the MS-DOS command-line, but I
> > can't
Dennis Lubert wrote:
just saw the new cygwin release, and since I don't know who to ask, I
ask you ;) Is there any other shell, oder shell-like program I can use
cygwin with ? I use is currently with the MS-DOS command-line, but I
can't resize this, can't do copy/paste and so on... I would lik
Hi,
just saw the new cygwin release, and since I don't know who to ask, I ask
you ;) Is there any other shell, oder shell-like program I can use cygwin
with ? I use is currently with the MS-DOS command-line, but I can't resize
this, can't do copy/paste and so on... I would like to use it like a
"Latest Cygwin DLL release version is" line on website doesn't seem to
update when the rerelease (-1, -2, etc.) component of version number
changes.
I think I noticed this back with 1.3.14 too.
Is this a manual process, or is it automatic?
Max.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/m
I'm trying to build the gcc cvs sources from the 3.2 branch and trunk
but I get the following problem:
stage1/xgcc.exe -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/gcc-binutils/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ -g -O2
-DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
-Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-l
On Sun, 2002-11-17 at 20:35, Max Bowsher wrote:
> Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But newbies wouldn't know to run it.
1) Link on the home page.
2)
'Help, installing cygwin fails.
Run the pre-install checker from the homepage.
Oh, that picked up *lots* of things, I've done what it s
Forwarding this to the list, so it may be of some help to anyone searching
the archives...
Max.
Chris Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a million, that worked like a charm! PostgreSQL is up and
> running
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Max Bowsher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 09:00, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> In that vein, can anyone think of other improvements to cygcheck?
>> For instance, maybe it could debug common /etc/passwd or /etc/group
>> problems. Or, maybe it could detect a NetworkSimplicit
Robert Collins wrote:
but there isn't and , though the "stl_*" version is
there to be used.
Is this normal/expected?
Yes, have a look at www.sgi.com/tech/stl
Ohh, they're still-not-standard extensions... so either I use them with
bits/stl_multimap.h header or I don't use them at all,
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 07:49, Lapo Luchini wrote:
> I don't understand completely the logic behind STL headers...
> e.g. there is that uses
> and there is too
> but there isn't and , though the "stl_*" version is
> there to be used.
>
> Is this normal/expected?
Yes, have a look at www.sgi.com
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 09:00, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> In that vein, can anyone think of other improvements to cygcheck? For
> instance, maybe it could debug common /etc/passwd or /etc/group problems.
> Or, maybe it could detect a NetworkSimplicity installation and optionally
> uninstall it.
I
On Sat, 2002-11-16 at 06:37, Mark Bradshaw wrote:
> Here. Sorry if there is some confusion. Frankly, considering the number of
> installs I think the confusion has been minimal. As a side note I've many
> times been in conversation with a user and suggested that it might be time
> to can the pac
37 matches
Mail list logo
