Just out of curiosity, why has this discussion suddenly moved to cygwin
at cygwin dot com from cygwin-apps at cygwin dot com?
It was my error, an little accident. Sorry
Ralf
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 02:27:21PM -0500, Brian Gallew wrote:
I've added a couple more paragraphs at the beginning that should be enough
to at least get you pointed in the right direction.
I've wrangled with this a bit, but unfortunately the only printer I
have is not PS or one supported by
I've been playing again with the nfs server and found another problem.
I still mount my Cygwin home under my home dir on a Linux workstation. The
only thing I've changed and seems to be the one that triggers the problem
is, that on the Cygwin machine I've changed the permissions for my home
dir
This version re-enables the checks for owner/group of the
exports file, and updates the nfs-server-config script to
set the owner/permissions on the default exports file
to the expected values.
If you already have an existing exports file, you will need
to explicitly change owner/permissions on
REQUEST
I am MR REUBEN SAVIMBI one of the favorite sons of Mr.JONAS SAVIMBI (The Rebel leader)
and also the head of the Unita Forces of Angola who was killed in the Struggle between
Angolan arm forces and his unita rebels On Friday the 22nd of February 2002.
I am from Angola but currently I am
I tried to login to remote unix machine using the following command.
$ ssh -X -l username remote_hostname_or_ip_address
by giving my username and host name. I have successfully installed
Cygwin/XFree. All it says is command not found. I am not sure whether
the path name was to be given in this
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 4:10 pm, arasu wrote:
I tried to login to remote unix machine using the following command.
$ ssh -X -l username remote_hostname_or_ip_address
by giving my username and host name. I have successfully installed
Cygwin/XFree. All it says is command not found. I am not sure
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum
Module name:winsup
Branch: cgf-dev-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-02-15 22:05:06
Modified files:
cygwin : ChangeLog cygwin.din
cygwin/include/cygwin: version.h
Log message:
merge from trunk
Patches:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:34:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:42:19AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I suppose so, but, again, it seems like many people *recently* are
unaware of the setup program entirely.
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 04:33:47AM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
Also this was in the strace output that Peter sent in, I withheld this bit,
as I didn't quite know whether this was intended (from mkpasswd's side)
65 19353 [main] mkpasswd 1148 pwdgrp::read_group: Completing
/etc/group:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:34:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:42:19AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I suppose so, but, again, it seems like many people *recently* are
unaware of the setup program
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 04:33:47AM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
Also this was in the strace output that Peter sent in, I withheld this
bit,
as I didn't quite know whether this was intended (from mkpasswd's side)
65 19353 [main] mkpasswd 1148 pwdgrp::read_group: Completing
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 04:33:47AM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
Also this was in the strace output that Peter sent in, I withheld this
bit,
as I didn't quite know whether this was intended (from mkpasswd's side)
65 19353 [main] mkpasswd 1148 pwdgrp::read_group: Completing
I noticed the thread here starting at
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-12/msg01010.html. Did the patch in
that thread ever get into the Cygwin Mutt package? I am getting the same
errors mentioned in that thread. The patch does not seem to be included the
mutt source package that I have.
* Steve (03-02-15 04:55 +0100)
I put script files called word and excel in my /usr/local/bin. These
files have the path to the ms word and ms excel executables.
They work, they bring up the apps, but I can't get the apps to take
command line arguments to open remote files.
For example:
I'm using sed on cygwin.
I have a problem with -i option.
- - - - -
kei@cygwin% cat test
apple
kei@cygwin% ls
test
kei@cygwin% cat test
apple
kei@cygwin% sed -i s/apple/orange/g test
kei@cygwin% cat test
apple
kei@cygwin% ls
sed003980
test
kei@cygwin% cat sed003980
orange
I just found the new version of sed, so I installed it.
I tried the same thing and the problem did not occur.
I think the problem was solved...
Sorry to bother.
kei@cygwin% sed -V
GNU sed version 4.0.5
--
Kei Tsuji
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug
I'm using sed on cygwin.
I have a problem with -i option.
- - - - -
kei@cygwin% cat test
apple
kei@cygwin% ls
test
kei@cygwin% cat test
apple
kei@cygwin% sed -i s/apple/orange/g test
kei@cygwin% cat test
apple
kei@cygwin% ls
sed003980
test
kei@cygwin% cat
I can imagine that this must get asked all the time,
yet I wasn't able to find anything useful on Google or
anywhere else.
How do I create a new user account? I know that it
probably has to exist as a Windows user first. So I
created a new Windows user. But then what? How do I
get cygwin to make
* Kei Tsuji (03-02-15 12:32 +0100)
I'm using sed on cygwin.
I have a problem with -i option.
[...]
Does anybody have the same problem with me?
Works for me...
And how can I fix this problem?
kei@cygwin% sed -V
GNU sed version 4.0.1
Thorsten@freki% sed -V
I can imagine that this must get asked all the time,
yet I wasn't able to find anything useful on Google or
anywhere else.
How do I create a new user account? I know that it
probably has to exist as a Windows user first. So I
created a new Windows user. But then what? How do I
get cygwin
* David Rasmussen (03-02-15 12:47 +0100)
How do I create a new user account? I know that it
probably has to exist as a Windows user first. So I
created a new Windows user. But then what? How do I
get cygwin to make a /home/newuser dir
This is done automatically when the login shell for that
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
12608240 [main] perl 934555 sync_with_child: child -50248815(0x154)
died
before initialization with status code 0x1
12608301 [main] perl 934555 sync_with_child: *** child state child
loading
dlls
C:\CYGWIN\BINERL.EXE: *** couldn't
The only thing I can think of is that these error's
are due to perl-5.8 still being in it's cygwin
experimental phase. Do you get error's from perl-5.6?
I get the same errors after using perl-5.6 from cygwin
mirror sites or compiling it on my pc, as well as
perl-5.8. The page faults have been
Hi,
ecasound 2.2.1, which was just released a few moments ago, now
cleanly compiles and runs under Cygwin.
I must say I was suprised how easy the porting job was and how well it
runs. Ecasound contains a lot of tricky stuff (lots of threads, fork()s
from threads, use of POSIX real-time features
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:31:38PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
Elfyn McBratney wrote on 14 Feb 2003 18:18:47 -
In bash you can add the following
# DEL key in bash
\e[3~: delete-char
to your ~/.inputrc or your /etc/inputrc file to get a functioning DEL
ke.
Thanks! I've
Hi,
When I had NTSEC on I'd get:
$ procmail VERBOSE=yes .procmailrc testmail
procmail: [3936] Wed Feb 12 00:39:58 2003
procmail: Suspicious rcfile /home/asimha/.procmailrc
procmail: Couldn't read /home/asimha/.procmailrc
procmail: Locking /var/spool/mail/asimha.lock
procmail: Assigning
Ajay Simha wrote:
Hi,
When I had NTSEC on I'd get:
$ procmail VERBOSE=yes .procmailrc testmail
procmail: [3936] Wed Feb 12 00:39:58 2003
procmail: Suspicious rcfile /home/asimha/.procmailrc
procmail: Couldn't read /home/asimha/.procmailrc
ls -l /home/asimha/.procmailrc
(with ntsec on).
On Sat Feb 15 15:21:30 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Ajay Simha wrote:
Hi,
When I had NTSEC on I'd get:
$ procmail VERBOSE=yes .procmailrc testmail
procmail: [3936] Wed Feb 12 00:39:58 2003
procmail: Suspicious rcfile /home/asimha/.procmailrc
procmail: Couldn't read
David,
Key sequence generation is not a shell issue, it's defined by the
terminal emulator which gets key-codes from the OS and generates
sequences of bytes to send through a pseudo-tty to whatever application
(shell or otherwise) that's reading. Likewise, it interprets things
like
On 15 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 10:53, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 15 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 09:28, Christopher Faylor wrote:
[snip]
I was also thinking of creating a '/dev/tty' file in the archive which
was just
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 04:29:24PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
ecasound 2.2.1, which was just released a few moments ago, now
cleanly compiles and runs under Cygwin.
Nice to hear.
to run just fine under Cygwin. Only placed I needed __CYGWIN32__ was for
Please use __CYGWIN__, since
Ajay Simha wrote:
On Sat Feb 15 15:21:30 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Ajay Simha wrote:
Hi,
When I had NTSEC on I'd get:
$ procmail VERBOSE=yes .procmailrc testmail
procmail: [3936] Wed Feb 12 00:39:58 2003
procmail: Suspicious rcfile /home/asimha/.procmailrc
procmail: Couldn't read
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 04:33:47AM -, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
Also this was in the strace output that Peter sent in, I withheld this bit,
as I didn't quite know whether this was intended (from mkpasswd's side)
65 19353 [main]
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Jon LaBadie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 11:31:38PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
Elfyn McBratney wrote on 14 Feb 2003 18:18:47 -
In bash you can add the following
# DEL key in bash
\e[3~: delete-char
to your ~/.inputrc or your /etc/inputrc file
After the install completes..
Your cygwin install is now ready to use. Please run setup.exe again
if you want to Install new packages, Remove installed packages, or
Update your install with the latest versions of your installed
packages.
I like it. Apparently it is extremely confusing
On 15-Feb-2003 06:14, Randall R Schulz wrote:
Steve,
Double damn!
Or maybe... Third time's the charm. Yeah, that's it!
-==-
#!/bin/bash
wwArgs=()
for arg; do
wwArgs[${#wwArgs[@]}]=$(cygpath -m $arg)
done
exec /cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft Office/Office/winword.exe
${wwArgs[@]}
Michael,
All right, all right. One is enough.
However, your solution is missing quoting of $arg in the cygstart
invocation, and that's a Unix-centric practice we like to discourage
around here because of the much greater likelihood of failure under Windows.
Also, cygstart resides in the
--- Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:34:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:42:19AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I suppose so, but, again, it seems like many people
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 10:00:51AM -0800, Rick Rankin wrote:
--- Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:34:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:42:19AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:59, Christopher Faylor
[snip]
Well, guess what comes up first on a Google search for cygwin install?
See for yourself: http://google.com/search?q=cygwin+install (just in
case, the first match I get is
http://www.woodsoup.org/projs/ORKiD/basic.htm,
last updated on March 24, 2000). :-(
That page worked a lot better
[snip]
Unfortunately, if you just want to install a single package, and newer
versions of other packages that you already have installed have been
released, it's cumbersome to tell Setup not to upgrade those other
packages (ie. mark them all as Keep), because you have to scroll through
the
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I suppose so, but, again, it seems like many people *recently* are unaware
of the setup program entirely.
Hmm, I think we should add a new screen to setup.exe.
After the install completes..
Your cygwin install is now ready to use.
At 10:34 2003-02-14, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
...
Can anyone offer any explanation about this? Or maybe convince me that
I'm wrong in noticing this trend? I suppose that it is possible that
we are now hitting a newer stupider
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 07:34:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:42:19AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I suppose so, but, again, it seems like many people *recently* are
unaware of the setup program
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:21:46PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I think something's wildly wrong with the world when my handful of
crusty old pages end up as the #1 Cygwin hit on Google. ;-) I can
assure everybody that I've done nothing to try to make that the case.
I think it's part of the
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:57:23PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Isn't it, in the first place the Cygwin Package Manager? cpm?
Even the suffix of the archive files could be cpm...
It's not at all unprecedented for Windows installers to be dual-use
like Cygwin Setup is. The control panel API
I noticed the thread here starting at
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-12/msg01010.html. Did the patch in
that thread ever get into the Cygwin Mutt package? I am getting the same
errors mentioned in that thread. The patch does not seem to be included the
mutt source package that I
At 11:21 2003-02-15, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Wow. Classic Cygwin humor, number 1 on Google!
I think something's wildly wrong with the world when my handful of crusty old
pages end up as the #1 Cygwin hit on Google. ;-) I can assure everybody that
I've done nothing to try to make that the
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:21:46PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I think something's wildly wrong with the world when my handful of
crusty old pages end up as the #1 Cygwin hit on Google. ;-) I can
assure everybody that I've done nothing to try to make that the case.
I think it's part
I apologise if this is the wrong list to report bugs. I have searched
the archive and haven't been able to find a reference to mempcpy.
To summarise, /usr/lib/libc.a doesn't currently define the function
mempcpy even though its prototyped in /usr/include/string.h, and its
described in cygwin's
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 12:35:56PM -0700, Roger Sayle wrote:
I apologise if this is the wrong list to report bugs. I have searched
the archive and haven't been able to find a reference to mempcpy.
As you have discovered, mempcpy is not provided. If a configure script
detects it, the configure
At 11:21 2003-02-15, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Wow. Classic Cygwin humor, number 1 on Google!
I think something's wildly wrong with the world when my handful of crusty old
pages end up as the #1 Cygwin hit on Google. ;-) I can assure everybody that
I've done nothing to try to make that
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 02:11:09PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:21:46PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I think something's wildly wrong with the world when my handful of
crusty old pages end up as the #1 Cygwin hit on Google. ;-) I can
assure everybody that I've
As you have discovered, mempcpy is not provided. If a configure script
detects it, the configure script is broken.
Thanks for the fast response. Unfortunately in your haste you may
have missed the point of the e-mail.
Cygwin's /usr/include/string.h prototypes mempcpy. If cygwin doesn't
bChristopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 12:35:56PM -0700, Roger Sayle wrote:
I apologise if this is the wrong list to report bugs. I have
searched the archive and haven't been able to find a reference to
mempcpy.
As you have discovered, mempcpy is not provided. If a configure
Hello,
We wanted to contact you today to inform you that there is a strong likelihood your
PC's hard drive is infected with SpyWare. Spyware is a common term for files that
are installed on your system without your knowledge that allow companies to monitor
your Internet activity. What they
Why not have two links on the page...
1) Cygwin Setup
2) Cygwin Package Maintainer
both of which are symb-links to setup.exe ;)
J.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:22:49PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
bChristopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 12:35:56PM -0700, Roger Sayle wrote:
I apologise if this is the wrong list to report bugs. I have
searched the archive and haven't been able to find a reference to
mempcpy.
As you
Roger Sayle wrote:
As you have discovered, mempcpy is not provided. If a configure
script detects it, the configure script is broken.
Thanks for the fast response. Unfortunately in your haste you may
have missed the point of the e-mail.
Cygwin's /usr/include/string.h prototypes mempcpy.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:22:49PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 12:35:56PM -0700, Roger Sayle wrote:
I apologise if this is the wrong list to report bugs. I have
searched the archive and haven't been able to find a
On Sat Feb 15 16:09:20 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Ajay Simha wrote:
On Sat Feb 15 15:21:30 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Ajay Simha wrote:
Hi,
When I had NTSEC on I'd get:
$ procmail VERBOSE=yes .procmailrc testmail
procmail: [3936] Wed Feb 12 00:39:58 2003
procmail: Suspicious
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:19:05PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Yes, in an ideal world, configure would deal with this - but unless you
have a better idea, the only way I can think of dealing with it is to
copy the problem header to the compilation directory, parse out the
problem declaration
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:19:05PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
Yes, in an ideal world, configure would deal with this - but unless
you have a better idea, the only way I can think of dealing with it
is to copy the problem header to the compilation directory, parse
out
Christopher Faylor wrote:
So, the cygwin bug report is noted and appreciated. We'll fix this
eventually. However, the correct fix is to modify the configury
mechanism which trips up on this in libintl.
I guess I can't get by without giving the long answers to reports
like this... We should
Many thanks to cgf for checking in the solution for mempcpy.
I'm now more than happy.
However you might also consider that there still remain a
significant number of potentially problematic function prototypes
from cygwin's header files: strndup, exp2, scalbln, tgamma, nearbyint,
lrint, round,
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Of course we're going to fix cygwin. I just checked in a fix. While I
assume this will probably be the end of it since no one will go to the
effort of trying to fix libintl's configury and, if they did, there
would probably be no official response anyway, the
Roger Sayle wrote:
Might I suggest that if keeping cygwin and newlib in sync is
logistically very complicated, and you don't wish to provide
cygwin-specific headers, you might ask the newlib folks
to incorporate #ifndef __CYGWIN__ tags in their upstream
headers.
This approach makes it far
for cygwin's build machinery (as suggested by Max) to correct
newlibs headers for use on cygwin, removing all the unexported
function prototypes.
Umm... no. I didn't say that.
Doh, I apologise. I misread the text before
unless you have a better idea, the only way I can think of
Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Of course we're going to fix cygwin. I just checked in a fix.
While I assume this will probably be the end of it since no one will
go to the effort of trying to fix libintl's configury and, if they
did, there would probably be no official
Max Bowsher wrote:
Fix how? Unless I'm very much confused, this would require configure to
create 2 new headers, containing lines like those below for every function
that was in a header but did not link, AND then wrapping every include of
system headers in every source file with #include
Charles Wilson wrote:
No. I'm going to fix memcpy. If it ain't broke, don't mess with it.
memcpy is broken. I'll fix *that*.
Isn't this the first time anyone has reported these problem
prototypes messing up a compile?
Nope; I've done it several times. 'course, my solution at those times
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 03:10:38PM -0700, Roger Sayle wrote:
However you might also consider that there still remain a significant
number of potentially problematic function prototypes from cygwin's
header files: strndup, exp2, scalbln, tgamma, nearbyint, lrint, round,
lround, trunc, remquo,
On 15 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:23, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Or have
web crawlers changed such that this doesn't work anymore?
I'll try that. Thanks.
I wouldn't: google actively lowers your page ranking when it sees such
garbage.
Where, exactly,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 06:25:06PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
For other newlib platforms (e.g. embedded systems?) if the header
declares the function, then the function is there. 'Nuff said.
I don't think that can be true with newlib. I'm sure that there are
some embedded systems which don't
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 10:41, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Where, exactly, did you read this (a link to some doc would be
enightening)? I see nothing about this in Googles documentation of Page
Ranking. And, google isn't the only search engine out there. I'd think
you'd want to try and get as
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 03:41:37PM -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On 15 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-02-15 at 08:23, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Or have
web crawlers changed such that this doesn't work anymore?
I'll try that. Thanks.
I wouldn't: google actively
Max Bowsher wrote:
3 things:
- The issue here was mempcpy, not memcpy
okay, fine...
- Cygwin *doesn't* have a memcpy.h
It was simply an example. sure, memPcpy is declared in string.h. The
point is, the declaration is found, but the (test) link fails (during
configury). and because it
Charles Wilson wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
3 things:
- The issue here was mempcpy, not memcpy
okay, fine...
- Cygwin *doesn't* have a memcpy.h
It was simply an example. sure, memPcpy is declared in string.h. The
point is, the declaration is found, but the (test) link fails (during
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Ajay Simha wrote:
When I had NTSEC on I'd get:
$ procmail VERBOSE=yes .procmailrc testmail
procmail: [3936] Wed Feb 12 00:39:58 2003
procmail: Suspicious rcfile /home/asimha/.procmailrc
procmail: Couldn't read /home/asimha/.procmailrc
I don't know about
On 16 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 10:41, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Where, exactly, did you read this (a link to some doc would be
enightening)? I see nothing about this in Googles documentation of Page
Ranking. And, google isn't the only search engine out there.
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 11:48, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On 16 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 10:41, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Where, exactly, did you read this (a link to some doc would be
enightening)? I see nothing about this in Googles documentation of Page
There is still a problem with big fortran arrays even after resetting
heap_chunk_in_mb 1024. The subsequent test program exits with no output and
no error message. When run in gdb, a segmentation fault is reported.
Following a suggestion from comp.lang.fortran, I increased the stack size
using
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Breaking up the headers or
adding a OS-specific capability.h, or something similar, which defines
__HAVE_CLOCK would probably be the best way to deal with this. Assuming
that this was a major issue -- which I don't think it is.
You mean, if it ain't broke don't mess
Just wanted to drop a note... kudos on a great thing for those of us
enslaved on a wintendo.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 08:50:02PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Breaking up the headers or adding a OS-specific capability.h, or
something similar, which defines __HAVE_CLOCK would probably be the
best way to deal with this. Assuming that this was a major issue --
which
On Sun Feb 16 08:54:49 2003, Greg Matheson wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Ajay Simha wrote:
When I had NTSEC on I'd get:
$ procmail VERBOSE=yes .procmailrc testmail
procmail: [3936] Wed Feb 12 00:39:58 2003
procmail: Suspicious rcfile /home/asimha/.procmailrc
procmail:
patch-2.5.8-3 requires the new symbol strerror_r, which is not provided
by cygwin-1.3.19; it was added in 1.3.20. Therefore, if you've updated
'patch' but not 'cygwin', you get a missing symbol popup.
I'm not complaining; this is not abnormal behavior. We guarantee
backward compatibility,
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:05:29PM -0500, Alec Effrat wrote:
Just wanted to drop a note... kudos on a great thing for those of us
enslaved on a wintendo.
but...? but...?
Come on. It's a great thing, but...
It's too hard to set up?
The people are too mean?
You can't allocate 27G of memory?
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 09:05:31PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
patch-2.5.8-3 requires the new symbol strerror_r, which is not provided
by cygwin-1.3.19; it was added in 1.3.20. Therefore, if you've updated
'patch' but not 'cygwin', you get a missing symbol popup.
I'm not complaining; this is
Alec,
There appears to have been an error in the delivery your message. All
that got through was a simple thank-you and a compliment.
Apparently lost in the transmission of your message was the part
following the complimentary thank-you in which you complain about the
idiotic way in which
I think Randall R Schulz wrote:
Alec,
There appears to have been an error in the delivery your message. All
that got through was a simple thank-you and a compliment.
Boy, I can just see poor Alec scratching his head...
-
Ernest
I have problem to use the new gdb (20030214)
Just upgrade the gdb-20030214.
But, the error message shown in runing %gdb -w a.out
GNU gdb 2003-02-15-cvs (cygwin-special)
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:02:21PM +0800, Topas wrote:
I have problem to use the new gdb (20030214)
Just upgrade the gdb-20030214.
But, the error message shown in runing %gdb -w a.out
Use 'insight'.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:04:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 12:02:21PM +0800, Topas wrote:
I have problem to use the new gdb (20030214)
Just upgrade the gdb-20030214.
But, the error message shown in runing %gdb -w a.out
Use 'insight'.
Sorry. A little to quick
Sorry, forget to mention
insight doesn't work too.
Use 'insight'.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
On 16 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 11:48, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On 16 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 10:41, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Where, exactly, did you read this (a link to some doc would be
enightening)? I see nothing about
At 08:47 PM 2/15/2003 -0800, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On 16 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 11:48, Peter A. Castro wrote:
On 16 Feb 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-02-16 at 10:41, Peter A. Castro wrote:
Where, exactly, did you read this (a link to some
I think I can turn this into an awk script and get my Cyppy auto-answer system
on line in no time! Lesse if I remember:
/It's too hard to set up/ { print ASCIICyppy; print FAQSetup; }
/You can't read your man pages/ { print ASCIICyppy; print FAQman; }
It's so crazy it just might
You know, I've been 'round these parts for a long time now, and I recall very
few instances of the Cygwin sucks type of messages you describe. Like one guy
in fact. Yeah, I know it's meant in jest, but lordy, learn how to take a
compliment guys, sheesh.
Then again, maybe I just haven't listened
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
