Hey. I've just downloaded and installed cygwin, and I'm trying to use
emacs. I quite like all the cool stuff it does, but I have a slight
problem... I can't quit.
I'm running it under Windows 98SE via the cygwin bash shell, and when I try
to quit, all I get is a bell. I hit Ctrl-X Ctrl-C and
Requesting approval to apply this patch.
BEGIN_PATCH
Index: bootstrap.sh
===
RCS file: /home/max/cvsmirror/cygwin-apps-cvs/setup/bootstrap.sh,v
retrieving revision 2.2
diff -u -r2.2 bootstrap.sh
--- bootstrap.sh 27 Apr 2002 00:00:04
On 8 Mar 2003, vijay kiran kamuju wrote:
hi,
when is it going to be the next release of the the setup.exe with
all the CURRENT PATCHES, i need it asap. as for downloading the
source frm cvs, i dont have vc++, r a cvs client installed at my
office. so when r u releasing the new version of
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Cygwin setup compiles fine with Cygwin gcc.
---
Pardon me, kind sir, but I have a itty bitty teensie weensie
problem with this:
make all-recursive
make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/setup-0'
Making all in bz2lib
make[2]:
You've obviously compiling from a branch. Branched setup is not
gcc3 ready. Install gcc-2 package and use gcc-2 + g++-2 to compile
setup.exe.
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, linda w (cyg) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Igor Pechtchanski
Cygwin setup compiles fine with Cygwin gcc.
---
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
3. LPRng
date : 21 Jan 2003
version: 3.8.19-1
status : reviewed; updated package available
notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
You've obviously compiling from a branch. Branched setup is not
gcc3 ready. Install gcc-2 package and use gcc-2 + g++-2 to compile
setup.exe.
Unfortunately, that won't work either.
2.249.2.5 isn't even gcc-2 ready.
Max.
The PROJ Cartographic Projections library (and utilities) originally
written by Gerald Evenden then of the USGS. It is used by libgeotiff,
among other things, for manipulating images of maps.
The package consists of 3+1 separate cygwin packages:
The main utilities and cartographic
linda w (cyg) wrote:
Compiling from a branch? How did I manage that?
The setup source tarball you are using originated from the setup-200206
branch.
I just have 'gcc' downloaded -- If I install the gcc2 package will
the ./configure script just 'do the right thing' and select
the compiler it
3. LPRng
date : 21 Jan 2003
version: 3.8.19-1
status : reviewed; updated package available
notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00215.html
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00172.html
reviews:
The problem is, way back then when 2.249.2.5 was release, gcc3 didn't exist
yet. The setup code from then didn't comply strictly enough to C++ standards
===
Heresy!! Not compliant with standards...how could they?! I'm
ashamed to be hobnobbin' with such types...ignoring
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, linda w (cyg) wrote:
Compiling from a branch? How did I manage that?
I am a mindreader isn't it that what you've expected ?
To answer the question - I didn't read your email till the end because I
recognized the problem when I looked at the error messages. It is not a
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, linda w (cyg) wrote:
The problem is, way back then when 2.249.2.5 was release, gcc3 didn't exist
yet. The setup code from then didn't comply strictly enough to C++ standards
===
Heresy!! Not compliant with standards...how could they?! I'm
ashamed to be
linda w (cyg) wrote:
The problem is, way back then when 2.249.2.5 was release, gcc3
didn't exist yet. The setup code from then didn't comply strictly
enough to C++ standards
===
Heresy!! Not compliant with standards...how could they?! I'm
ashamed to be hobnobbin' with such types...ignoring
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 07:41, Max Bowsher wrote:
I traced it to this curious condition:
pkg.desired.sourcePackage() == false
pkg.desired.sourcePackage().picked() == true
How? Well, it turns out that the defaultversion placeholder object used,
amongst other circumstances, when a
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 22:44, Max Bowsher wrote:
Requesting approval to apply this patch.
If you create a changelog entry, yes.
Will do, tomorrow.
Max.
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
linda w (cyg) wrote:
Compiling from a branch? How did I manage that?
The setup source tarball you are using originated from the setup-200206
branch.
I just have 'gcc' downloaded -- If I install the gcc2 package will
the ./configure script just
Earnie Boyd wrote:
Max Bowsher wrote:
IMO, a simple bootstrap.sh containing the appropriate autotool
commands would be better.
A source release for a binary package isn't supposed to require
autotools. IIRC, this is GNU standards mandated; if not it certainly
is autoconf mandated.
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
linda w (cyg) wrote:
Compiling from a branch? How did I manage that?
The setup source tarball you are using originated from the
setup-200206 branch.
I just have 'gcc' downloaded -- If I install the gcc2 package will
the
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:13:43AM +1100, Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cygwin (Robert Collins) [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: He wrote, then she wrote, ... (was RE:
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 11:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
So, for you to get snapshot access, ask Chris for
a) scp upload access
b) write access to the setup-snapshots directory.
Don't ask Chris. Go to http://sourceware.org/ and fill out the form
referenced on that page. List [EMAIL
(Robert Collins) wrote:
I have a symlink in my home dir called setup-snapshots, which is a
link to the actual dir for http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots.
To make a snapshot, I use:
make snapshot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voila.
So, for you to get snapshot access, ask Chris for
a) scp
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 01:04:12AM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
(Robert Collins) wrote:
I have a symlink in my home dir called setup-snapshots, which is a
link to the actual dir for http://www.cygwin.com/setup-snapshots.
To make a snapshot, I use:
make snapshot [EMAIL PROTECTED]
voila.
Patches/changes queued for review:
* Add foreign to AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS (both setup and libgetopt++)
* Remove autotool-generated files from CVS
Patches being worked on:
* Fix the Cannot open (null) for reading bug (Max)
No patch yet.
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
Well, I've reviewed / applied the bulk of the queue.
There is a new snapshot of HEAD being uploaded as I type.
To get this released we need to work through the bugs in README.
Given the number of features already added to HEAD, I consider new
feature
Christopher Faylor wrote:
That is the right way to do it but since we're discussing this here,
it's silly to bother overseers. It's a manual step that I have to do
so I'll just remove the CVS-only restriction.
Thanks Chris!
Robert: Shall I keep a snapshot of HEAD up-to-date? If so, what
Robert: Should I write ChangeLog entries for README changes? I was thinking
no, but then I noticed you did, today.
Max.
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 13:42, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert: Should I write ChangeLog entries for README changes? I was thinking
no, but then I noticed you did, today.
Up to you. I thought importing the list of bugs was worthy.
Rob
--
GPG key available at:
Here is the contents of the setup TODO, and some comments on how I think the
items should be dealt with.
* Mirrors list orer is snafued.
It's the same order as in the release (2.249.2.5) setup. Therefore I propose
deleting this item, and add Improve mirror selection to WISHLIST.
* Chooser
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 13:58, Max Bowsher wrote:
Here is the contents of the setup TODO, and some comments on how I think the
items should be dealt with.
* Mirrors list orer is snafued.
It's the same order as in the release (2.249.2.5) setup. Therefore I propose
deleting this item, and add
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 13:58, Max Bowsher wrote:
Here is the contents of the setup TODO, and some comments on how I
think the items should be dealt with.
Robert Collins wrote:
(condensed) ACK to some items.
Done all ACKs.
(condensed) No, still a TODO. (to many items)
OK. Perhaps we need
Igor helpfully said:
The CVS version is trivial to compile - just follow the instructions at
http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin-apps/setup.html.
Igor
---
Ever had someone give you directions and tell you you can't
miss it?...:-)
Then max chimed in with some more details...
cvs
Try --disable-shared
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of linda w (cyg)
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 9:59 PM
To: 'Max Bowsher'; 'Igor Pechtchanski'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: when is next release of setup.exe
Igor helpfully said:
The
Oh...*doh*...how'd I cut and paste that wrong?
I tried it with eliminating the argument...seems to run...
Now I'm worried...why'd it work?cause I happen to havea ll
the write libraries in place and a generic new-user wouldn't
have them?
ok...
tnx...
-l
-Original Message-
Linda, reconfigure your program and include --disable-shared in with it
/path/to/setupsources/configure --disable-shared.
I was not sure if you'd respond.
I'm going to try this after the hard drive is defragmented here.
Later
Robert McNulty Junior.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
* Preliminary colour-coding patch (from me)
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00361.html
Code design feedback received from Robert.
GUI feedback appreciated from *anyone*.
I *really* liked this addition. Having to go through that entire list of
packages in the chooser can
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I had anticipated some change in the design though
(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-01/msg00362.html)
I was anticipating the need to customize the colours. Re-designing
would be
premature until that has been
I've merged this into the README.
Thanks Max,
Rob
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 6:06 AM
Subject: Setup Bug Collation
The new setup snapshot 2.303 has been out a while now, and there have
been a
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is policy for setup? Should we regenerate Makefile.in (and
aclocal.m4,
and any other relevent files) with the current Cygwin release of
automake,
since we are changing it at all, or would you prefer to keep it at the
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 12:25 PM
Subject: Pending setup patches (issue 3)
Updated:
* Remove concat.*
In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00022.html
Applied.
Rob
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is policy for setup? Should we regenerate Makefile.in (and
aclocal.m4, and any other relevent files) with the current Cygwin
release of automake, since we are changing it at all, or
Max Bowsher wrote:
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is policy for setup? Should we regenerate Makefile.in (and
aclocal.m4, and any other relevent files) with the current Cygwin
release of automake, since we are
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Igor's error message patch
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00017.html
Commited.
I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}.
Rob
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Pavel's patch for Exceptions freeing their messages too early
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00176.html
Applied.
Rob
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Pavel's Do not uninstall if upgrade package fails md5 patch
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00178.html
Pavel,
This patch was missing IDS_CRC_ERROR definitions, even though it used
it.
Tsk!
I've
Well, I've reviewed / applied the bulk of the queue.
There is a new snapshot of HEAD being uploaded as I type.
To get this released we need to work through the bugs in README.
Given the number of features already added to HEAD, I consider new
feature patchs lowest priority, and patches solving
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: I think I've GOT IT! The Cannot open (null) for
readingbug!!!
Robert Collins wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 07:41,
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
I've tweaked packageversion to
use a mutator function, and overriden it in defaultversion. You can
equally trip an Exception in _defaultversion::pick(bool) if you want
to find where it was being set. I'll be interested to know if this
solves the problem ( I
===
- Original Message -
From: linda w (cyg) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I didn't know it was in reference to the CVS...I just tried
current released source for current released setup with current
released tools -- which I realize (now) was completely naive of
me. :-/
Naive, yes. Foolish no.
===
- Original Message -
From: vijay kiran kamuju [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2003 6:00 PM
Subject: when is next release of setup.exe
hi,
when is it going to be the next release of the the setup.exe with
all the CURRENT PATCHES, i need it asap.
Max Bowsher wrote:
IMO, a simple bootstrap.sh containing the appropriate autotool
commands would be better.
A source release for a binary package isn't supposed to require
autotools. IIRC, this is GNU standards mandated; if not it
certainly
is autoconf mandated. The configure script
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
I'd really have loved to have a new setup
release, oh, 8 months back. And that would compile out of the box with
the current gcc. However whats released has been very stable, and the
time to finish releasing HEAD keeps getting away from us. HEAD has
lots of
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cygwin (Robert Collins) [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: He wrote, then she wrote, ... (was RE: when is next release
of setup.exe)
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cygwin (Robert Collins) [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: He wrote, then she wrote, ... (was RE: when is next release
of setup.exe)
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Igor's error message patch
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00017.html
Commited.
I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}.
===
- Original Message -
From: Igor Pechtchanski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}.
Rob
Only if files is traversed in order of decreasing minlevel.
Otherwise
we'd have to traverse the whole set before we can find the right log
file.
I did the [- Install Cygwin now. Ran setup and Ta-Da working like
a charm ..except
/usr/X11R6 - not there. To include xhost - very imprortant to me :-(
What'da I miss?
Tks
Chris Howells wrote:
With an X server running on a Win32 machine, it's possible to run X
applications (e.g. on Linux) and have them sent over the network to appear
on the Win32 machine.
However, has anybody tried the other way around -- having Windows
applications appearing on a Linux desktop,
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 17:56:13
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog external.cc fhandler_proc.cc
fhandler_process.cc pinfo.h
Log message:
Revert below changes regarding
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-03-08 19:22:08
Modified files:
winsup/cygwin : pinfo.cc
Log message:
missed in last checkin
Patches:
Max Bowsher wrote:
I'm not quite sure rpm really is desirable for the Cygwin dist, unless it
was decided to transition to rpm packages exclusively once setup was
suitably adapted.
Well, there are grand designs eventually to generalize setup so that it
can accept tar.bz2 (or .cyg?)
Hi
I've made a new version of binutils available for installation.
This version is a refresh from CVS on sources.redhat.com.
This release has one minor change from Chuck Wilson to make
--enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc the default for `ld'.
Are there no more changes in this release ? Wenn I
--- Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please keep replies on the list.
Joseph Colton wrote:
--- Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are your Windows DPI/font size settings
non-default?
(In the Display control
panel)
My font sizes are all default. I tried changing
the
At 14:22 2003-03-06, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
To Whom It May Concern,
Beware programmers named after Roman gods with eyes (and faces) on
both sides of their head bearing pre-compiled software. He sees the
outside _and_ inside! Get it? He's trying to see inside your
Hello, list,
This is my first message to the list, if it is just a FAQ, please
forgive me and kindly point me to the link. BTW, I have briefly browsed
the cygwin FAQ.
I have a copy of cygwin/xfree86 installed and worked fine for a couple
of months. But last week my windows became unbootable and
I'll go you one better Max: a combined bat/perl script that downloads and
installs a snapshot. Attached is what I use to install the latest snapshots;
put it anywhere (rename it to .bat, I had to get it through Outlook), MAKE
SURE YOU DON'T HAVE ANY CYGWIN THINGS RUNNING, run it, and you're set.
I'll go you one better Max: a combined bat/perl script that downloads and
installs a snapshot. Attached is what I use to install the latest snapshots;
put it anywhere (rename it to .bat, I had to get it through Outlook), MAKE
^^
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I'll go you one better Max: a combined bat/perl script that
downloads and installs a snapshot. Attached is what I use to
install the latest snapshots; put it anywhere (rename it to .bat,
I had to get it through Outlook), MAKE SURE YOU DON'T HAVE ANY
CYGWIN THINGS
Yongtao Yang wrote:
Hello, list,
This is my first message to the list, if it is just a FAQ, please
forgive me and kindly point me to the link. BTW, I have briefly
browsed the cygwin FAQ.
I have a copy of cygwin/xfree86 installed and worked fine for a couple
of months. But last week my
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I'll go you one better Max: a combined bat/perl script that
downloads and installs a snapshot. Attached is what I use to
install the latest snapshots; put it anywhere (rename it to .bat,
I had to get it through Outlook), MAKE SURE YOU DON'T HAVE ANY
CYGWIN
Max Bowsher wrote:
Yongtao Yang wrote:
Hello, list,
This is my first message to the list, if it is just a FAQ, please
forgive me and kindly point me to the link. BTW, I have briefly
browsed the cygwin FAQ.
I have a copy of cygwin/xfree86 installed and worked fine for a couple
of months. But
When I installed fetchmail-6.2.2.1, fetchmail started refusing to
use my .fetchmailrc. I think the requirement that permissions be
600 on it is new.
However when I tried chmodding it to 600, it stays at 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
$ ls -al .fetchmailrc
-rw-r--r--1 greg unknown 864 Feb
On Saturday 8 Mar 03, Greg Matheson writes:
When I installed fetchmail-6.2.2.1, fetchmail started refusing to
use my .fetchmailrc. I think the requirement that permissions be
600 on it is new.
However when I tried chmodding it to 600, it stays at 644
This is in the FAQ.
David
--
Gar-Gar,
At 03:04 2003-03-08, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
At 14:22 2003-03-06, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Randall R Schulz wrote:
To Whom It May Concern,
Beware programmers named after Roman gods with eyes (and faces) on
both sides of their head bearing pre-compiled software. He sees the
In fact, I got away with adding -ltcl -ltk to the gcc -o ... line in the
Makefile. Somehow the ./configure didn't do this for me.
Thanks anyways..
Eric
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Andrew Markebo wrote:
Hi!
Just a quick thought, throw us the command-line that gives the error
too.. And there are a
To whom it may concern,
It is a harmless email. If we have bothered you, please ingore this message and accept
our appology.
Our aim is to looking for a partner for long term only.
We are a leading plastic scrap importer in China. With own reprocessing facilities,
import
license, we are
On Fri, 7 Mar 2003, Andrew DeFaria wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Andrew,
I was not accusing anyone of anything; I was simply commenting on the
general statements made by people in this thread. I'm sorry if it
seems to you that you were accused. You did read the P.S., right?
The PS
Ralf Habacker wrote:
Hi
I've made a new version of binutils available for installation.
This version is a refresh from CVS on sources.redhat.com.
This release has one minor change from Chuck Wilson to make
--enable-runtime-pseudo-reloc the default for `ld'.
Are there no more changes in this
The Midnight Commander visual shell has been updated to version
4.6.0-1. This is major upgrade and the result of more then
one and a half year of bugfixing and code cleanup.
You can find the official announcement here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2003-February/msg00043.html
Full
Hallo Volker,
Am Mittwoch, 5. März 2003 um 11:03 schriebst du:
Gerrit == Gerrit P Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gerrit Hallo Dr. Zell,
By the way I'm using perl-5.8.0. (Does anyone know why
all the man pages and perl scripts in /bin have CRLF's ?)
Gerrit You're the
Hi all,
Hopefully someone here can give me a pointer/explanation of how to
increase SOMAXCONN.
In the last Cygwin I setup, it is defined as 5:
In /usr/include/cygwin/socket.h:
...
/* Maximum queue length specificable by listen. */
#define SOMAXCONN 5
...
I need it to be higher (a daemon
-Original Message-
Subject: Re: setup.exe is too small
It is indeed a natural assumption that the phrase to demand that
something be done is addressed to me, that I was demanding that
something be done.
, relax. And pay attention. The whole thread was
about people who did seem
pkgconfig is a tool used for managing the configuration
information of OTHER packages.
This is a routine update to the latest upstream version, 0.15.0.
--Chuck
To update your installation, click on the Install Cygwin now link
on the http://cygwin.com/ web page. This downloads setup.exe to
your
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:13:43AM +1100, Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cygwin (Robert Collins) [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: He wrote, then she wrote, ... (was RE:
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 11:17, Christopher Faylor wrote:
So, for you to get snapshot access, ask Chris for
a) scp upload access
b) write access to the setup-snapshots directory.
Don't ask Chris. Go to http://sourceware.org/ and fill out the form
referenced on that page. List [EMAIL
I've made a new version of 'bison' available for download. This updates
the package to the latest version available from CVS. It seems to fix
the problem that some people have had with some .y files, most notably
the ones in the cygwin setup sources.
For a brief descripton of this package, see
There is a new setup.exe snapshot. It's a minor increment over the
current setup.
Specifically it should address the problems with ntsec being on by
default, and a recent bug report where proxies that need a username and
an empty password couldn't be used.
You can download the snapshot from
The 'unzip' package has been updated to version 5.50-1. UnZip
is an open-source, command-line alternative to other zip-format
archives such as WinZip, etc. unzip-5.50 is the latest release
from Info-Zip, http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/UnZip.html.
CHANGES from 5.50-1
o Add fix for an
At 11:23 AM 3/9/2003 +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
There is a new setup.exe snapshot. It's a minor increment over the
current setup.
From an ntsec point of view it tries to insure that the file
permissions *displayed* by ls -l allow at least rx access.
When running the new snapshot, please be on
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is policy for setup? Should we regenerate Makefile.in (and
aclocal.m4, and any other relevent files) with the current Cygwin
release of automake, since we are changing it at all, or
Max Bowsher wrote:
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is policy for setup? Should we regenerate Makefile.in (and
aclocal.m4, and any other relevent files) with the current Cygwin
release of automake, since we are
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
I've tweaked packageversion to
use a mutator function, and overriden it in defaultversion. You can
equally trip an Exception in _defaultversion::pick(bool) if you want
to find where it was being set. I'll be interested to know if this
solves the problem ( I
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
I'd really have loved to have a new setup
release, oh, 8 months back. And that would compile out of the box with
the current gcc. However whats released has been very stable, and the
time to finish releasing HEAD keeps getting away from us. HEAD has
lots of
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cygwin (Robert Collins) [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: He wrote, then she wrote, ... (was RE: when is next release
of setup.exe)
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cygwin (Robert Collins) [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: He wrote, then she wrote, ... (was RE: when is next release
of setup.exe)
Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Cygwin (Robert Collins) wrote:
===
- Original Message -
From: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Igor's error message patch
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-02/msg00017.html
Commited.
I still suspect we need a = rather than == - but we'll see :}.
The 'unzip' package has been updated to version 5.50-1. UnZip
is an open-source, command-line alternative to other zip-format
archives such as WinZip, etc. unzip-5.50 is the latest release
from Info-Zip, http://www.info-zip.org/pub/infozip/UnZip.html.
CHANGES from 5.50-1
o Add fix for an
97 matches
Mail list logo
