Some mail to the spam trap on sourceware indicates that CLISP no longer has
a Cygwin maintainer.
Is anyone interested in maintaining this?
cgf
On 24 July 2006 17:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Now that Microsoft has finally dropped support for Windows 98 and Me,
we're going to drop 9x support as well.
What we're planning to do is this:
The complete net distribution gets copied to a new place. This new
place is the distro kept for
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 06:05:47PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
On 24 July 2006 17:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Now that Microsoft has finally dropped support for Windows 98 and Me,
we're going to drop 9x support as well.
What we're planning to do is this:
The complete net distribution gets
On Jul 24 18:05, Dave Korn wrote:
On 24 July 2006 17:59, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Now that Microsoft has finally dropped support for Windows 98 and Me,
we're going to drop 9x support as well.
What we're planning to do is this:
The complete net distribution gets copied to a new
I need to correct the setup.hint for orpie. orpie depends on gsl, which
used to depend explicitly on lapack, but doesn't any more. But orpie
still needs it. So now I need to add the dependence on lapack to
setup.hint.
Question: if I just post the new setup.hint for upload, is that enough
to
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:03:41PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to correct the setup.hint for orpie. orpie depends on gsl, which
used to depend explicitly on lapack, but doesn't any more. But orpie
still needs it. So now I need to add the dependence on lapack to
setup.hint.
Question:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:30:36AM +, Ryan Chan wrote:
Hi Cedric,
We would like to invite you to explore our job opportunities at Nvidia, pls
email me [EMAIL PROTECTED] for further discussion
This is not a recruiting mailing list.
Please do not send any further email here.
--
Unsubscribe
Am Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:57:46 -0400
schrieb Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You could double click on the sylpheed-claws icon after X had been
started.
Hello,
I like to have no terminal open. I like to start SC without terminal.
Only SC
Dirk
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 09:49:17PM +0200, Dirk Schleicher wrote:
Am Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:57:46 -0400
schrieb Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You could double click on the sylpheed-claws icon after X had been
started.
Hello,
I like to have no terminal open. I like to start SC without
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Branch: cv-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-24 11:46:29
Modified files:
winsup : ChangeLog Makefile.in
winsup/testsuite: ChangeLog Makefile.in
winsup/cygwin : ChangeLog
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-07-25 00:22:19
Modified files:
winsup/w32api : ChangeLog
winsup/w32api/include: aclui.h basetyps.h comcat.h commdlg.h
docobj.h mshtml.h oaidl.h objfwd.h
On Jul 21 20:52, Igor Peshansky wrote:
In any case, here's the latest incarnation, with get_word and get_dword
folded into path.cc, and display_error returned to cygcheck.cc, where it
belongs. Tested reasonably well (with symlinks pointing to symlinks,
etc). I'll let you judge the neatness
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote on Sunday, July 23, 2006 1:08 AM:
On 07/21/2006, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
I just had to deal with such a messy system and the new Cygwin make
doesn't work. Even though this collection of makefiles was initially
written on a POSIX system it still got into trouble
Hi there i had Cygwin installed about about a year ago and have it installed
on my second partition but i have recovered the computer's main partition
since and now i get access denied when trying to delete the bin folder. I've
tryed command line deletion as well as thru explorer but now joy.
Thanks for your response , Igor.
On 7/21/06, Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006, Hemal Pandya wrote:
Hello,
If I create a file somefile.exe outside cygwin then cygwin reports
that it is executable. But if the file is created by cygwin then it
does not become executable unless
Hi,
I have a laptop with AMD Turion processor running Windows XP SP2. I
have installed cygwin on my laptop. I am having problems executing the
programs I have compiled using gcc (that comes along with Cygwin). The
following error is reported:
$ ./dineroIV
./dineroIV: ./dineroIV: cannot execute
On Jul 21 19:21, Bengt-Arne Fjellner wrote:
Hi first of all thanks for a wonderful set of programs.
Now the problem:
Top reports 16*the memory used for a process. Also in percent its wrong.
It uses the pagesize from getpagesize()*first field of /proc/*/statm
Which is wrong /proc/*/statm or
It would be possible to change /proc/*/stat{m} to use the page size
of 64K, but this would make the values in those files imprecise. It
might be better just to change top.
I'll see if I can patch top to get these right. IIRC there is a
constant defined somewhere with the correct page size.
On 24 July 2006 07:43, shocker-z wrote:
Hi there i had Cygwin installed about about a year ago and have it installed
on my second partition but i have recovered the computer's main partition
since and now i get access denied when trying to delete the bin folder. I've
tryed command line
On 24 July 2006 10:15, Keshavan Varadarajan wrote:
Hi,
I have a laptop with AMD Turion processor running Windows XP SP2. I
have installed cygwin on my laptop. I am having problems executing the
programs I have compiled using gcc (that comes along with Cygwin). The
following error is
On Jul 21 15:54, Dave Korn wrote:
STC:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / mkdir mnt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / cd mnt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt mkdir foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt ls
foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt mount -s C:\\ /mnt/foo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt mount -u C:\\ /mnt/foo/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /mnt mount |
On Jul 24 11:25, Chris January wrote:
It would be possible to change /proc/*/stat{m} to use the page size
of 64K, but this would make the values in those files imprecise. It
might be better just to change top.
I'll see if I can patch top to get these right. IIRC there is a
constant defined
Hello,
I modify the startx.bat by removing the line
I try to modify the startx.bat.
I remove
%RUN% xterm -e /usr/bin/bash -l
and put
%RUN% sylpheed-claws
in.
Now I was able to start SC by a window icon. But in this way I am not
able to get my mails because there is no connection or let me say
On 23 July 2006 12:37, MariLiza Koukouli wrote:
Does this mean anything to anyone?
It means that PBGroutines.c has failed to include
some vital header or
other. Whatever the word before off64_t on line 7 is, it should have
been defined and it hasn't been.
Hi Dave,
thanks for
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 11:28:02AM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
On 24 July 2006 10:15, Keshavan Varadarajan wrote:
I have a laptop with AMD Turion processor running Windows XP SP2. I
have installed cygwin on my laptop. I am having problems executing the
programs I have compiled using gcc (that comes
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 04:12:39PM +0200, Dirk Schleicher wrote:
Hello,
I modify the startx.bat by removing the line
I try to modify the startx.bat.
I remove
%RUN% xterm -e /usr/bin/bash -l
and put
%RUN% sylpheed-claws
in.
Now I was able to start SC by a window icon. But in this way I am not
Harig, Mark wrote:
-Original Message-
I have the same exact problem as Steve:
I have a (what appears to be) similar problem also with a dual core
(Centrino Duo) machine. My problem manifests when I attempt
to paste in an
X window (i.e. click the middle mouse button). I
Hello Larry!
Let's start over. If you're having a problem with Cygwin, please read
and follow the problem reporting guidelines found here:
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
This should give us some idea what you're having trouble with and what
may be possible
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 06:06:01PM +0200, Daniela D?rbeck wrote:
Let's start over. If you're having a problem with Cygwin, please read
and follow the problem reporting guidelines found here:
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
This should give us some idea what you're having
The current version of binutils actually does produce dlls, like, for
instance, cygwin1.dll.
Mine are not built.
I cite Yaakov from another message: objdump from binutils-20060709-1 does
absolutely nothing; even running
objdump without any arguments, which in 20050610-1 returns the help
On 24 July 2006 17:39, Daniela Dürbeck wrote:
What in the world does this have to do with copying a configuration to
another PC?
Nothing.
Then perhaps you should take a look at the subject line.
I thought you read my real problem in the other mail and knew that
I have two PCs and
Daniela Dürbeck wrote:
The current version of binutils actually does produce dlls, like, for
instance, cygwin1.dll.
Mine are not built. I cite Yaakov from another message: objdump from
binutils-20060709-1 does absolutely nothing; even running objdump without
any arguments, which in
Hi all,
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:03:43PM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
There was also some difference in newline handling which required another
set of sed changes, arghh!
Well with detailed bug reports like this and the previous make provides an
error on one
On 7/24/06, Joachim Achtzehnter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sarcastic response to one sentence out of a much longer post quoted in
isolation suggests that a clarification is in order.
here here! i'd like to add that i'm getting fed up of reading sarcastic
comments from cgf since i rejoined
Hi,
Perhaps someone who knows can confirm that I've got this right:
The executables in a Cygwin download can be much older than the download
date, where much 3 years.
This suggests that executables are only rebuilt when their own sources
change. Previously built executables can continue to be
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, CARTER Alan wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps someone who knows can confirm that I've got this right:
The executables in a Cygwin download can be much older than the download
date, where much 3 years.
This suggests that executables are only rebuilt when their own sources
change.
Mark Fisher wrote:
On 7/24/06, Joachim Achtzehnter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This sarcastic response to one sentence out of a much longer post
quoted in
isolation suggests that a clarification is in order.
here here! i'd like to add that i'm getting fed up of reading sarcastic
comments from
Env: WinVista running on vmserver 1.0 hosted on WinXP64
Symptom: bash.exe has failed ... cygwin setup is partial, but
reports complete.
I reinstalled several times with different options. Here is what doesn't work.
- Start / Help / Can my older programs ... / Run Compatibility Wizard
Mark
Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:03:43PM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
My second post was specifically in response to the claim by mwoehlke
suggesting that the changes were not an inconvenience. In this post
all the issues I mentioned were
On 24 July 2006 18:43, CARTER Alan wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps someone who knows can confirm that I've got this right:
The executables in a Cygwin download can be much older than the download
date, where much 3 years.
Yep. Unless something goes wrong with the efforts to maintain
On 22 July 2006 02:04, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
mwoehlke wrote:
Michael Hirsch wrote:
Here is a sample Makefile that breaks with Gnu Make 3.81-1 under
Cygwin, but works fine with Gnu Make 3.80-1.
[ ... snip ... ]
Was this a deliberate break with backwards compatibility?
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 01:01:55PM -0500, mwoehlke wrote:
Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:03:43PM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
My second post was specifically in response to the claim by mwoehlke
suggesting that the changes were not an
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:12:17AM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:03:43PM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
There was also some difference in newline handling which required
another set of sed changes, arghh!
Well with detailed bug reports
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 02:42:40PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:12:17AM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:03:43PM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
There was also some difference in newline handling which required
I am trying to run a build script via crontab and am dying
because crontab is run as system and one of the commands
in my scripts requires that I run as a specific user.
I've tried many things
cygrunsrv -I cron -p /usr/sbin/cron -a -D -u SCROOGE2\\builder
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Dave Korn wrote:
Which begs the question: given that you were working on such a large and
complex makefile system, and given that it had non-POSIX paths in a makefile,
and given that it wasn't broke and didn't need fixing ...
... why on EARTH did you deliberately go and upgrade to a new
Earl Box wrote:
I am trying to run a build script via crontab and am dying
because crontab is run as system and one of the commands
in my scripts requires that I run as a specific user.
I've tried many things
cygrunsrv -I cron -p /usr/sbin/cron -a -D -u SCROOGE2\\builder
- - -
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Well, you *could* expect a fix if you provided enough details.
Understood. The question is, can there still be value in reporting that a
program crashes, even with minimal but potentially still useful
information? I'm just asking and am genuinely interested in
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 12:53:19PM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Well, you *could* expect a fix if you provided enough details.
Understood. The question is, can there still be value in reporting
that a program crashes, even with minimal but potentially still useful
I think problem reports in itself are already useful so people can
search the mailing lists to see whether the type of problem they run
into is already reported. With some luck they can solve or workaround it
with the suggestions, but even if no solution or explanation is
available, it may save
Hello all,
New to the list. enjoying messing around with cygwin as I haven't dabbled in
linux for a year (and haven't ever messed with cygwin until recently).
(long story short: Getting message 'You need Mesa or an OpenGL-System
to compile Armagetron.' when compiling src rpm).
long story:
I was
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 01:01:55PM -0500, mwoehlke wrote:
Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2006 at 06:03:43PM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
My second post was specifically in response to the claim by
Hi,
I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it
and the only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't
think is the right version. Advice welcomed.
TIA.
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the
Hi Dave!
This *is* the other mail. This is not the -ldl thread. You replied to
the wrong message without noticing!
Yes, sorry. I apologize the mistake and the confusion I have caused. :-(
Greetings from Dani
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 10:39:29PM +0200, Daniela Duerbeck wrote:
This *is* the other mail. This is not the -ldl thread. You replied
to the wrong message without noticing!
Yes, sorry. I apologize the mistake and the confusion I have caused.
:-(
No problem. I've done the same thing myself.
Arian Hojat wrote:
Hello all,
New to the list. enjoying messing around with cygwin as I haven't
dabbled in
linux for a year (and haven't ever messed with cygwin until recently).
(long story short: Getting message 'You need Mesa or an OpenGL-System
to compile Armagetron.' when compiling src
TV JOE wrote:
Hi,
I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it
and the only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't
think is the right version. Advice welcomed.
Try:
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=complex.h
That will tell you what packages
TV JOE wrote:
I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it
and the only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't
think is the right version. Advice welcomed.
No, probably not...
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin2/package-grep.cgi?grep=/complex.h suggests
there is one
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:00:37PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
TV JOE wrote:
I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it and the
only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't think is the
right version. Advice welcomed.
Try:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I guess that means there is nothing more to discuss.
Agreed, except for the following.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 12:53:19PM -0700, Joachim Achtzehnter wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Well, you *could* expect a fix if you provided enough details.
Understood. The
Before I get started, please note that I'm a complete Cygwin newbie, so
try to bear with me.
We had Cron running on a system to check the integrity of our backups,
but the drive went out. We had a backup of the drive before it went
out. My boss now wants me to make the Cron run again from
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:00:37PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
TV JOE wrote:
I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it and the
only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't think is the
right version. Advice welcomed.
Try:
Andrew King wrote:
Before I get started, please note that I'm a complete Cygwin newbie, so
try to bear with me.
We had Cron running on a system to check the integrity of our backups,
but the drive went out. We had a backup of the drive before it went
out. My boss now wants me to make the
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, mwoehlke wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:00:37PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
TV JOE wrote:
I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it and the
only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't think is
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 05:00:37PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
TV JOE wrote:
I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it and the
only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't think is the
right version. Advice welcomed.
Try:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A new release of tar, 1.15.91-1, is available, replacing 1.15.1-4 as the
current version.
NEWS:
=
This is a new beta-quality upstream release. However, it fixes enough
bugs, and has been available long enough upstream, that I felt it was
worth
On Mon, Jul 24, 2006 at 01:36:47PM -0700, TV JOE wrote:
Hi,
I've a C program referencing complex.h. But make can't find it
and the only copy I see is in /usr/include/mingw which I don't
think is the right version. Advice welcomed.
Comment out the complex.h, see what errors you get,
Suppose a Windows 2000/XP/2003 machine exists where three accounts need to be
added for use only with SSH to a Unix/Linux machine, for ssh/scp/sftp use.
Further suppose these user accounts are to be named ssh_user_a, ssh_user_b,
and ssh_user_c, and that these should exist only in Cygwin's
i use gdb6.4 for remote debug between windows-xp(gdb) and linux(gdbserver).
the gdb of windows-xp is recompiled by gcc of cygwin and
the gdbserver of linux is also recompiled on linux.
but i occure two problems.
1. when i set a breakpoint in my source-code(no multithread) at client, the
Keith Christian wrote:
Suppose a Windows 2000/XP/2003 machine exists where three accounts need to be
added for use only with SSH to a Unix/Linux machine, for ssh/scp/sftp use.
Further suppose these user accounts are to be named ssh_user_a, ssh_user_b,
and ssh_user_c, and that these should exist
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:25:13AM +0800, veinson.fu wrote:
i use gdb6.4 for remote debug between windows-xp(gdb) and linux(gdbserver).
the gdb of windows-xp is recompiled by gcc of cygwin and
the gdbserver of linux is also recompiled on linux.
but i occure two problems.
1. when i set a
Hi!
I think that several people have this problem: If you get a new PC you
have to manually switch on all programs that you want or need.
Is it possible to copy the configuration from one PC to another and if,
how?
This isn't necessarily a Cygwin question. But it's a very important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A new release of tar, 1.15.91-1, is available, replacing 1.15.1-4 as the
current version.
NEWS:
=
This is a new beta-quality upstream release. However, it fixes enough
bugs, and has been available long enough upstream, that I felt it was
worth
73 matches
Mail list logo
