Re: RFU: mercurial-1.5.2

2010-06-03 Thread Jari Aalto
Corinna Vinschen http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/mercurial/mercurial-1.5.2-1-src.tar.bz2 \ http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/mercurial/mercurial-1.5.2-1.tar.bz2 \ http://cante.net/~jaalto/tmp/cygwin/mercurial/setup.hint Uploaded. Can the 1.4 versions be removed? Yes.

Python 2.6.5-1: python2.6.exe permission denied

2010-06-03 Thread Jari Aalto
After installing 2.6.5-1: $ python -V sh: /usr/bin/python: Permission denied $ /usr/bin/python2.6.exe -V sh: /usr/bin/python2.6.exe: Permission denied $ ls -la /usr/bin/python* lrwxrwxrwx 1 jaalto root 13 Jun 3 09:42 /usr/bin/python - python2.6.exe lrwxrwxrwx 1

Remove PINE from distro

2010-06-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi guys, pine is the only package still using the really crufty openssl-0.9.7. Since Igor Peshansky is AWOL for quite some time now, I'd like to remove the pine and openssl097 packages from the distro. ASAP. Does anybody have a problem with that? If so, would you take over maintainership for

Re: Python 2.6.5-1: python2.6.exe permission denied

2010-06-03 Thread Jason Tishler
Jari, On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:26:50AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: After installing 2.6.5-1: $ python -V sh: /usr/bin/python: Permission denied $ /usr/bin/python2.6.exe -V sh: /usr/bin/python2.6.exe: Permission denied [snip] WFM: $ python -V Python 2.6.5 $

[RFU] glpk-4.44-1

2010-06-03 Thread Marco Atzeri
New upstream version to download: wget -r -np -nH --cut-dirs=2 http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin-1.7/glpk/ glpk-4.44-1-src.tar.bz2 glpk-4.44-1.tar.bz2 libglpk-devel/libglpk-devel-4.44-1.tar.bz2 libglpk-devel/setup.hint libglpk0/libglpk0-4.44-1.tar.bz2 libglpk0/outpb.lp libglpk0/setup.hint

Re: Remove PINE from distro

2010-06-03 Thread Cygwin/X
Corinna Vinschen wrote: pine is the only package still using the really crufty openssl-0.9.7. Since Igor Peshansky is AWOL for quite some time now, I'd like to remove the pine and openssl097 packages from the distro. ASAP. Does anybody have a problem with that? If so, would you take over

More security vulnerabilities

2010-06-03 Thread Cygwin/X
Updated list for this week: * ImageMagick: upgrade to at least 6.5.2.9 (latest is 6.6.2.1) * lighttpd: update to latest 1.4.26 * nano: upgrade to latest 2.2.4 wchar support can also be added as in Ports: http://cygwin-ports.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cygwin-ports/ports/trunk/apps/nano/ *

Re: mintty/Windows interoperability (was: Re: default terminal)

2010-06-03 Thread Andy Koppe
On 2 June 2010 21:39, Thomas Wolff wrote: Before making it the only default, however, there's still two issues to consider concerning interoperability with Windows programs:   * The known limitation with certain Windows (or even DOS) programs     due to the incompatibility of some of the

Re: default terminal

2010-06-03 Thread d . sastre . medina
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 06:54:12PM -0500, Yaakov wrote: On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:30:52 +0100, Dave Korn wrote: Let's call the shortcuts Cygwin Console and Cygwin GUI Terminal, and then people will think it's obvious why there's two of them. KISS: having two options *will* lead to confusion.

Re: default terminal

2010-06-03 Thread Kostya Altukhov
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 3:54 AM, Yaakov wrote: KISS: having two options *will* lead to confusion.  Whenever mintty becomes the default Cygwin shell, then the default Cygwin shortcuts should point to mintty -, period. Though I personally use rxvt-unicode and will continue to do so while it works

Re: mintty/Windows interoperability

2010-06-03 Thread Warren Young
On 6/2/2010 7:02 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: Does mintty currently work around any such problems? I really don't understand the question in light of the observations that there will be problems with some MS-DOS applications if we switch to mintty because of cygwin's pty implementation.

Re: Remove PINE from distro

2010-06-03 Thread Warren Young
On 6/3/2010 5:39 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Does anybody have a problem with that? If so, would you take over maintainership for pine? Aren't all the cool kids using alpine now instead?

Re: mintty/Windows interoperability (was: Re: default terminal)

2010-06-03 Thread Thomas Wolff
Am 03.06.2010 20:17, schrieb Andy Koppe: On 2 June 2010 21:39, Thomas Wolff wrote: ... * Another issue with even those Windows/DOS programs that do work in general: They assume the Windows ANSI encoding so their output (and input assumption) will not match the mintty character

Re: Python 2.6.5-1: python2.6.exe permission denied

2010-06-03 Thread Jari Aalto
Jason Tishler jason-/+chcdctalzr7s880jo...@public.gmane.org writes: Jari, On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:26:50AM +0300, Jari Aalto wrote: After installing 2.6.5-1: $ python -V sh: /usr/bin/python: Permission denied $ /usr/bin/python2.6.exe -V sh: /usr/bin/python2.6.exe: Permission denied

Re: Python packages by maintainer

2010-06-03 Thread Jari Aalto
Yaakov (Cygwin/X) Today being 01 June, the due date for Python 2.6: Jari Aalto: bzr codeville getmail mercurial offlineimap planet python-crypto python-feedparser python-paramiko spambayes stgit tailor urlgrabber Will be out ASAP when I get 2.6.x

Re: mintty/Windows interoperability

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:14:29PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: On 6/2/2010 7:02 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: Does mintty currently work around any such problems? I really don't understand the question in light of the observations that there will be problems with some MS-DOS applications if we

Re: mintty/Windows interoperability (was: Re: default terminal)

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 07:17:34PM +0100, Andy Koppe wrote: On 2 June 2010 21:39, Thomas Wolff wrote: Before making it the only default, however, there's still two issues to consider concerning interoperability with Windows programs: ?? * The known limitation with certain Windows (or even DOS)

Re: Remove PINE from distro

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 02:16:21PM -0600, Warren Young wrote: On 6/3/2010 5:39 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Does anybody have a problem with that? If so, would you take over maintainership for pine? Aren't all the cool kids using alpine now instead? That's what I hear. Also, from my very

Re: mintty/Windows interoperability (was: Re: default terminal)

2010-06-03 Thread Andy Koppe
On 3 June 2010 21:25, Thomas Wolff wrote: Ah, right! I had not noticed this, only that error message are not fixed. Something else that *is* fixed this way is e.g. cmd /c help (which also shows that cmd has a built-in chcp in addition to the stand-alone chcp.com that at least Windows XP has).

Re: default terminal

2010-06-03 Thread Andy Koppe
On 2 June 2010 21:39, Thomas Wolff wrote: Am 02.06.2010 15:30, schrieb Dave Korn:   We already get plenty of questions about the difference between a console and a terminal.  Don't think it'll be any different really.  Let's call the shortcuts Cygwin Console and Cygwin GUI Terminal, and then

Using the Canadian Multilingual Standard keyboard with Windows XP

2010-06-03 Thread Young, George
Using Windows XP and cygwin started with the command %RUN% XWin -multiwindow -clipboard -silent-dup-error -xkblayout ca -xkbvariant multix -xkbmodel pc104 If the Windows keyboard is set to US, cygwin works fine. If the Windows keyboard is set to Canadian Multilingual Standard, cygwin doesn't get

cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread nma
Hello, SUMMARY: I installed cygwin 1.7.5 on windows 7 (64 bit OS), and when I run some command which uses perl, I get the following error: 0 [main] perl 2528 C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - Internal error: TP_NUM_W_BUFS too small. DETAILS: I installed cygwin, all of it on

Re: Why call-process removes '{' and '}' chars from arguments???

2010-06-03 Thread Oleksandr Gavenko
On 2010.06.03 0:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: From: Oleksandr Gavenkogaven...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:40:46 +0300 I use Emacs 23.2 under Windows. (call-process echo.exe nil (get-buffer *Messages*) nil --bla {rev} }}}xxx{1}xxx{2}xxx{{{ ) put in Message buffer

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread nma
Quoting n...@12000.org: Hello, SUMMARY: I installed cygwin 1.7.5 on windows 7 (64 bit OS), and when I run some command which uses perl, I get the following error: 0 [main] perl 2528 C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - Internal error: TP_NUM_W_BUFS too small. SNIP fyi; I found this

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mercurial-1.5.2-1 -- Python based distributed version control (DVCS)

2010-06-03 Thread Jari Aalto
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION === Homepage: http://mercurial.selenic.com License : GPL Distributed, efficient Python based source control system. Mercurial is designed for efficient handling of very large distributed projects. CHANGES SINCE LAST RELEASE ==

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: openssl-0.9.8o-1, openssl-devel-0.9.8o-1

2010-06-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
I've updated the version of OpenSSL to 0.9.8o-1. This also includes the openssl-devel packages. This is an upstream security release. The Cygwin release is build from the vanilla sources, no additional patches. Official release message:

How you wrote wrapper around Cygwin scripts?

2010-06-03 Thread Oleksandr Gavenko
For example Mercurial VCS hg distributed as python script. To able invoke hg from cmd.exe (I some times use Far file manager and all time native GNU Emacs) I wrote wrapper: $ cat /bin/hg.bat @echo off python /bin/hg %* This script work fine except case then one of argument contain new line

openssl hanging on

2010-06-03 Thread Gary .
I quite often notice that when I try to close gnus, which is using (several instances of) openssl, it appears to hang. Today I for some reason got so ed off with it, I started closing the processes I thought belonged to it, starting with the openssl ones. As soon as I closed the last one, gnus

Re: Why call-process removes '{' and '}' chars from arguments???

2010-06-03 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 6/3/2010 3:46 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote: On 2010.06.03 0:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: From: Oleksandr Gavenkogaven...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:40:46 +0300 I use Emacs 23.2 under Windows. (call-process echo.exe nil (get-buffer *Messages*) nil --bla {rev} }}}xxx{1}xxx{2}xxx{{{ )

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 6/3/2010 3:43 AM, n...@12000.org wrote: perl-ming 0.4.3-1 Incomplete That's not right. I'd suggest reinstalling perl-ming. -- Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread Nasser M. Abbasi
On 6/3/2010 8:08 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 6/3/2010 3:43 AM, n...@12000.org wrote: perl-ming 0.4.3-1 Incomplete That's not right. I'd suggest reinstalling perl-ming. I did the following: 1. reinstalled. 2. tried different source, downloaded, reinstalled I still get the same thing,

Ajouter un drapeau à ce mail Perl-Image-Magick cannot load Magick.dll

2010-06-03 Thread Vincent G.
Hi, I would like to use perlMagick. I installed perl-Image-Magick with setup.exe but I can't get it work. What's the trick ? $ perl -e use Image::Magick; Can't load '/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10/i686-cygwin/auto/Image/Magick/Magick.dll' for module Image::Magick: No such file or directory

Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Wingert
Using strace I was able to look at some of the functions that are enumerated by debugging calls. The trace below is done by ls.exe for each file (approximately 95k files @ 88 mSecs/file), approximately 40 mSecs are spent in lstat64() and another 47 mSecs are spent in getacl(). It also *looks*

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 6/3/2010 12:32 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: On 6/3/2010 8:08 AM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 6/3/2010 3:43 AM, n...@12000.org wrote: perl-ming 0.4.3-1 Incomplete That's not right. I'd suggest reinstalling perl-ming. I did the following: 1. reinstalled. 2. tried different source,

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread Cygwin/X
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 6/3/2010 3:43 AM, n...@12000.org wrote: perl-ming 0.4.3-1 Incomplete That's not right. I'd suggest reinstalling perl-ming. Perhaps it has something to do with the colons in the manpage filenames? Yaakov -- Problem

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 6/3/2010 1:40 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 6/3/2010 3:43 AM, n...@12000.org wrote: perl-ming 0.4.3-1 Incomplete That's not right. I'd suggest reinstalling perl-ming. Perhaps it has something to do with the colons in

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread Nasser M. Abbasi
On 6/3/2010 12:43 AM, n...@12000.org wrote: Hello, SUMMARY: I installed cygwin 1.7.5 on windows 7 (64 bit OS), and when I run some command which uses perl, I get the following error: 0 [main] perl 2528 C:\cygwin\bin\perl.exe: *** fatal error - Internal error: TP_NUM_W_BUFS too small.

Re: Different user environment for key vs password authentication

2010-06-03 Thread jaynnas
To make sure I'm understanding the implication of your response, let me summarize... According to the link you sent, the different user environment is resulting not because of something that the ssh server (or cygwin) is doing/configured to do but because of how Windows handles remote log-ins

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 6/3/2010 3:02 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: Should I try building cygwin from sources on my PC? Debugging it further would certainly be helpful. But if you don't actually want to build Cygwin from source, you can always use a recent snapshot with its source and debugging information as a

Re: Different user environment for key vs password authentication

2010-06-03 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 6/3/2010 2:56 PM, jayn...@us.ibm.com wrote: To make sure I'm understanding the implication of your response, let me summarize... According to the link you sent, the different user environment is resulting not because of something that the ssh server (or cygwin) is doing/configured to do but

C: vs /cygdrive/c and git

2010-06-03 Thread Bill Hoffman
Can someone explain why if I use c:/some/path as an argument to git clone, it fails. But if I use /cygdrive/c/some/path it works. Here is an example: GIT_TRACE=1 git clone c:/Users/hoffman/Work/My\ Builds/CMake-gmake/Tests/ExternalProject/LocalRepositories/GIT foobar trace: built-in: git

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread Nasser M. Abbasi
On 6/3/2010 12:17 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 6/3/2010 3:02 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: Should I try building cygwin from sources on my PC? Debugging it further would certainly be helpful. But if you don't actually want to build Cygwin from source, you can always use a recent

Re: C: vs /cygdrive/c and git

2010-06-03 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/03/2010 02:03 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: Can someone explain why if I use c:/some/path as an argument to git clone, it fails. But if I use /cygdrive/c/some/path it works. Because c:/some/path looks like you are asking for protocol:file for talking to a remote machine, while

Re: cygwin 1.7.5, perl *** fatal error TP_NUM_W_BUFS too smal

2010-06-03 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 6/3/2010 4:19 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: On 6/3/2010 12:17 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 6/3/2010 3:02 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: Should I try building cygwin from sources on my PC? Debugging it further would certainly be helpful. But if you don't actually want to build Cygwin

Re: C: vs /cygdrive/c and git

2010-06-03 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/3/2010 4:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 06/03/2010 02:03 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: Can someone explain why if I use c:/some/path as an argument to git clone, it fails. But if I use /cygdrive/c/some/path it works. Because c:/some/path looks like you are asking for protocol:file for talking to

Re: C: vs /cygdrive/c and git

2010-06-03 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/03/2010 02:32 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: On 6/3/2010 4:20 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 06/03/2010 02:03 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: Can someone explain why if I use c:/some/path as an argument to git clone, it fails. But if I use /cygdrive/c/some/path it works. Because c:/some/path looks like

Re: Why call-process removes '{' and '}' chars from arguments???

2010-06-03 Thread Oleksandr Gavenko
On 2010-06-03 18:04, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: On 6/3/2010 3:46 AM, Oleksandr Gavenko wrote: On 2010.06.03 0:39, Eli Zaretskii wrote: From: Oleksandr Gavenkogaven...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2010 23:40:46 +0300 I use Emacs 23.2 under Windows. (call-process echo.exe nil (get-buffer

Re: C: vs /cygdrive/c and git

2010-06-03 Thread Bill Hoffman
On 6/3/2010 4:39 PM, Eric Blake wrote: On 06/03/2010 02:32 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: In that case, git is just blindly treating c: as ./c: - that is, the relative file named c: in the current directory. Since POSIX allows this interpretation, there's no reason for git to special case it and

Re: Reading /proc/registry/... returns extra char

2010-06-03 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Dave Korn! Erm... how about :type suffix? Don't know how POSIXy it is, but it's close enough to similar functionality of NTFS (file streams). To save having the whole discussion again, here's the summary from last time:

Re: C: vs /cygdrive/c and git

2010-06-03 Thread Eric Blake
On 06/03/2010 03:07 PM, Bill Hoffman wrote: Again, I don't think this is git specific, but I would like to understand at what level of cygwin this is coming from. You've got the source code, go debug it if you'd like. But I could care less about DOS names - either they work or they don't; in

Re: Different user environment for key vs password authentication

2010-06-03 Thread jaynnas
Ok. Thanks for the help. I'll give it a try next week when I have access again to the environment. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info:

Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:35:55AM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: Using strace I was able to look at some of the functions that are enumerated by debugging calls. The trace below is done by ls.exe for each file (approximately 95k files @ 88 mSecs/file), approximately 40 mSecs are spent in

Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Wingert
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:35:55AM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: Using strace I was able to look at some of the functions that are enumerated by debugging calls. The trace below is done by ls.exe for each file (approximately 95k files @ 88 mSecs/file), approximately 40 mSecs are spent in

Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 05:32:46PM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:35:55AM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: Using strace I was able to look at some of the functions that are enumerated by debugging calls. The trace below is done by ls.exe for each file

Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Wingert
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 05:32:46PM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: Yeah, that's what I thought you were doing. Given that the timestamps don't indicate elapsed time of function X, it's not always possible to figure out how long a function takes by subtracting. Subtracting timestamps shows

Re: 1.7.5: question about running cron tasks as normal local user (no domain users / no local admin group users)

2010-06-03 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
At 08:57 AM 6/3/2010, Adi B Treiner wrote: Hello, After upgrading to version 1.7.5 running cron tasks for normal local users doesnt work anymore. For those users cron always reports the following error: cron.exe: *** fatal error - could not load user32, Win32 error 1114 This seems to be

Re: Cygwin window closes by itself -- And, a strange workaround

2010-06-03 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 6/3/2010 8:34 PM, surendar jeyadev wrote: I have been using Cygwin for about 5 years on the same computer, without a problem (but for a strange change in bash history behaviour about a few months back -- more on that later, or in a separate thread). Suddenly, today, something strange has

Re: Cygwin Performance and stat()

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 07:57:31PM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 05:32:46PM -0700, Christopher Wingert wrote: Yeah, that's what I thought you were doing. Given that the timestamps don't indicate elapsed time of function X, it's not always possible to figure out how

Updated: mercurial-1.5.2-1 -- Python based distributed version control (DVCS)

2010-06-03 Thread Jari Aalto
PACKAGE DESCRIPTION === Homepage: http://mercurial.selenic.com License : GPL Distributed, efficient Python based source control system. Mercurial is designed for efficient handling of very large distributed projects. CHANGES SINCE LAST RELEASE ==

Updated: openssl-0.9.8o-1, openssl-devel-0.9.8o-1

2010-06-03 Thread Corinna Vinschen
I've updated the version of OpenSSL to 0.9.8o-1. This also includes the openssl-devel packages. This is an upstream security release. The Cygwin release is build from the vanilla sources, no additional patches. Official release message: