Hi Yaakov,
I'm just converting the OpenSSL package to cygport packaging. I
stumbled over two problems using cygport 0.10.10-1:
- Neither keepdir nor KEEPDIRS seem to do their job.
The OpenSSL package installs two empty dirs which are supposed to
be kept in the tar archive. So I tried
Jason, Ping?
Corinna
On Apr 23 19:30, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Jason,
per the discussion starting at
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2012-04/msg00443.html
I would like to apply the following patch to rebase and friends.
Thanks,
Corinna
ChangeLog:
* configure.ac
On 4/28/2012 5:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Yaakov,
I'm just converting the OpenSSL package to cygport packaging. I
stumbled over two problems using cygport 0.10.10-1:
- Neither keepdir nor KEEPDIRS seem to do their job.
The OpenSSL package installs two empty dirs which are supposed
On Apr 28 09:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 4/28/2012 5:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Hi Yaakov,
I'm just converting the OpenSSL package to cygport packaging. I
stumbled over two problems using cygport 0.10.10-1:
- Neither keepdir nor KEEPDIRS seem to do their job.
The OpenSSL package
On 28/04/2012 15:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 28 09:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 4/28/2012 5:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Another problem I just encountered is this:
OpenSSL cannot be built outside its source tree. So my src_compile
looks like this:
Use 'lndirs' instead
On 4/28/2012 4:33 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 28/04/2012 15:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 28 09:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 4/28/2012 5:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Another problem I just encountered is this:
OpenSSL cannot be built outside its source tree. So my src_compile
looks like
On Apr 28 16:48, marco atzeri wrote:
On 4/28/2012 4:33 PM, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 28/04/2012 15:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 28 09:00, Ken Brown wrote:
On 4/28/2012 5:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Another problem I just encountered is this:
OpenSSL cannot be built outside its source
built for Perl-5.14.2-1
to download (remove the index.html's) :
wget -r -np -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin-1.7/GraphicsMagick/index.html
rm ./index.html \
./libGraphicsMagick-devel/index.html \
./libGraphicsMagick3/index.html \
./perl-Graphics-Magick/index.html
rm
built for Perl-5.14.2-1
to download (remove the index.html's) :
wget -r -np -nH --cut-dirs=2 \
http://matzeri.altervista.org/cygwin-1.7/ImageMagick/index.html
rm ./ImageMagick-doc/index.html \
./index.html \
./libMagick-devel/index.html \
./libMagickCore5/index.html \
CVSROOT:/cvs/uberbaum
Module name:winsup
Changes by: c...@sourceware.org 2012-04-28 19:49:58
Modified files:
cygwin : ChangeLog environ.cc globals.cc pipe.cc
sigproc.cc
Log message:
* environ.cc (struct parse_thing): Add
CVSROOT:/cvs/src
Module name:src
Changes by: ironh...@sourceware.org 2012-04-29 02:43:40
Modified files:
winsup/w32api : ChangeLog
winsup/w32api/lib: Makefile.in
Added files:
winsup/w32api/include: shobjidl.h
winsup/w32api/lib: shobjidl-uuid.c
The problem i have is - no new user be created but i'm also administrator.
I want to restrict some folders from being moved(or even touched).
appreciate your hints help.
regards
pen
pen wrote:
How about locking the vnode or inode of directory? i did not find any such
reference but i
On 4/27/12 10:27 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
The above comment shows an and relationship here. Message type pipes
more closely mimic Linux (UNIX) pipe behavior AND are definitely
required for ptys.
Yeah, but because message pipes break other programs. Cygwin has only
been using message
On Apr 28 00:30, Rodrigo Medina wrote:
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
... you might consider to debug the tzset tool ...
The cygwin tzset program is OK.
The problem was caused by a non-standard TZ-regestry
produced by an non-official patch that I applied few
years ago when the venezuelan legal
Hi,
It seems to me that the behavior of the tzset tool does not
match the description given in the man pages.
Apparently the tzset tool which is part of the cygwin pckage
is different from the one described in the man pages. I
think that this is a confusing situation. If I am right,
I think
On 4/28/2012 5:29 PM, rodmed...@cantv.net wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that the behavior of the tzset tool does not
match the description given in the man pages.
Apparently the tzset tool which is part of the cygwin pckage
is different from the one described in the man pages. I
think that this
On Apr 28 13:02, Ken wrote:
marco atzeri wrote:
BLODA is still a possibility, I have Symantec installed; or there
is subtle bug handling the missing files on the website
Marco
Hi Marco,
Nice to see that you can reproduce the problem! I neglected to
mention that this seems to
On Apr 28 17:55, marco atzeri wrote:
On 4/28/2012 5:29 PM, rodmed...@cantv.net wrote:
Hi,
It seems to me that the behavior of the tzset tool does not
match the description given in the man pages.
Apparently the tzset tool which is part of the cygwin pckage
is different from the one
Is there a reason why the Cygwin executables, and certainly the
installer, are not digitally signed by Redhat?
Also, with reference to:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cjacks/archive/2009/03/27/manifesting-for-compatibility-on-windows-7.aspx
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:06:21PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 28 13:02, Ken wrote:
marco atzeri wrote:
BLODA is still a possibility, I have Symantec installed; or there
is subtle bug handling the missing files on the website
Marco
Hi Marco,
Nice to see that you can
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 08:06:21PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 28 13:02, Ken wrote:
marco atzeri wrote:
BLODA is still a possibility, I have Symantec installed; or there
is subtle bug handling the missing files on the website
Marco
Hi Marco,
Nice to
I've updated the version of OpenSSL to 1.0.1b-1.
This is an upstream new feature release. The Cygwin release is build from
the vanilla sources, now packaged using cygport.
Here's the official release message:
OpenSSL
Hi all,
I'm trying to use a home-built cross-gdb to do some remote debugging
over tcp, but running gdb inside emacs doesn't work. M-x gud-gdb works
fine, it's something wrong with the emacs integration. Unlike past times
this has come up, the issue doesn't seem to be related to seg faults;
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:24:29PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I can duplicate this. I'll try to fix it today.
I think I fixed the problem. I at least fixed *a* problem. The latest
setup.exe, now on cygwin.com has the fix that solved the issue for me.
cgf
--
Problem reports:
It's bad etiquette to derail an email thread with unrelated questions.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 07:22:29PM +0100, Nick Lowe wrote:
Is there a reason why the Cygwin executables, and certainly the
installer, are not digitally signed by Redhat?
setup.exe is not produced by Red Hat and the Cygwin
It's bad etiquette to derail an email thread with unrelated questions.
I certainly didn't mean to derail it, the other points were ancillary
to the implicit point that I intended to make which is that if the
executable was digitally signed, any potential corruption would
immediately be flagged
On 4/28/2012 10:45 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 02:24:29PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
I can duplicate this. I'll try to fix it today.
I think I fixed the problem. I at least fixed *a* problem. The latest
setup.exe, now on cygwin.com has the fix that solved
For some years I have run an old Unix system (OpenStep) as an NFS client.
The NFS server has been SFU running on Windows XP. This combination works
fine.
For Windows 7 I have looked at HameWin, FreeNFS, ... but they have
limitations like very restricted user mapping.
I've therefore tried Cygwin
I spent about 30-45 minutes choosing the packages I wanted from setup.exe, then
proceeded to download. The particular server I chose has a delay between files
of what seems like infinity, so I want to switch mirrors without having to
re-select packages. I was hoping that my selection was saved
Putting the packages directly in c:\Cygwin is ill-advised because it shows up in
the posix directory /. It pollutes the directory with millions of package
folders. But what if I create a folder c:\Cygwin\LocalPkgs and stick them in
there? From the 10,000 foot perspective, it certainly would be
Andy AndyMHancock at gmail.com writes:
I spent about 30-45 minutes choosing the packages I wanted from
setup.exe, then proceeded to download. The particular server I
chose has a delay between files of what seems like infinity, so I
want to switch mirrors without having to re-select packages.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 09:57:01PM +0100, Nick Lowe wrote:
It's bad etiquette to derail an email thread with unrelated questions.
I certainly didn't mean to derail it, the other points were ancillary
to the implicit point that I intended to make which is that if the
executable was digitally
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:06:29PM +, Andy wrote:
Andy AndyMHancock at gmail.com writes:
I spent about 30-45 minutes choosing the packages I wanted from
setup.exe, then proceeded to download. The particular server I
chose has a delay between files of what seems like infinity, so I
want to
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:02:54PM +, Andy wrote:
Putting the packages directly in c:\Cygwin is ill-advised because it shows up
in
the posix directory /. It pollutes the directory with millions of package
folders. But what if I create a folder c:\Cygwin\LocalPkgs and stick them in
there?
I installed 2.772 on my systems as soon as it was available and I
don't see any such issue using my local mirror. Did you try another
mirror?
Quite, but the idea of corruption was implicit in that question. A
digital signature would rule that out. It was only a suggestion to
ensure that that
I forgot to add, it also needs to be signed by a trusted root for it
to be useful to most people.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 1:51 AM, Nick Lowe nick.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I installed 2.772 on my systems as soon as it was available and I
don't see any such issue using my local mirror. Did you try
Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin.com writes:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:06:29PM +, Andy wrote:
Is there a way to switch mirrors without having to reselect
packages?
No.
Thanks, Chris.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
Christopher Faylor cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin.com writes:
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:02:54PM +, Andy wrote:
Putting the packages directly in c:\Cygwin is ill-advised because it
shows up in the posix directory /. It pollutes the directory with
millions of package folders. But
38 matches
Mail list logo
