Re: How can I try a newly build package locally?

Greetings, Ken Brown! > On 4/5/2016 7:26 PM, thoni56 wrote: >> Repository I can probably understand ;-) but exactly what does "try >> installing your pkg" mean? Do I just drop it in the repository? How is >> the setup.ini generated so it includes my package? >

Re: How can I try a newly build package locally?

On 4/5/2016 7:26 PM, thoni56 wrote: Repository I can probably understand ;-) but exactly what does "try installing your pkg" mean? Do I just drop it in the repository? How is the setup.ini generated so it includes my package? https://cygwin.com/git/?p=cygwin-apps/genini.git Is a local

Re: How can I try a newly build package locally?

Hi! Andrey! > Andrey Repin [via Cygwin] > > den 6 april 2016 01:20 > Greetings, thoni56! > > > I'm a maintainer of a program that I'd might like to propose for > inclusion in > > the Cygwin distribution. > > > We use CMake so there is a packager

Re: How can I try a newly build package locally?

Greetings, thoni56! > I'm a maintainer of a program that I'd might like to propose for inclusion in > the Cygwin distribution. > We use CMake so there is a packager available, and it's easy to create a > .bz2 package. > Once I've created the package, how can I try it locally? In Linux this can

How can I try a newly build package locally?

I'm a maintainer of a program that I'd might like to propose for inclusion in the Cygwin distribution. We use CMake so there is a packager available, and it's easy to create a .bz2 package. Once I've created the package, how can I try it locally? In Linux this can easily be done with dpkg, but

Re: openssl 1.1 beta release available?

2016-04-05 15:59 GMT+02:00 Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Gerrit Haase! > >> is there an openssl 1.1 beta build available somewhere, or is it >> planned to release soon? > > Betas are rarely built for Cygwin. > Wait for a full release, or ask to build with a specific patch, if you need > and

Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Be truthful about reporting whether readahead is available

On Apr 5 18:50, Thomas Wolff wrote: > > >>Von: Corinna Vinschen > >>An: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com > >>Cc: Thomas Wolff > >>Datum: 5. April 2016 um 15:55 > >>Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Be truthful about reporting whether readahead is > >>available > >> >

Re: Every time I update 64bit Cygwin refresh the following happens: 'Package: _/Unknown package' 'x3270.sh exit code 1'

Kenneth Wolcott writes: > Every time I update 64bit Cygwin refresh the following happens: > > Package: _/Unknown package > x3270.sh exit code 1 > > Just curious, is this an obsolete/orphaned package? Neither. You seem to have had that package installed at one time, but then either the the

Every time I update 64bit Cygwin refresh the following happens: 'Package: _/Unknown package' 'x3270.sh exit code 1'

Hi All; Every time I update 64bit Cygwin refresh the following happens: Package: _/Unknown package x3270.sh exit code 1 Just curious, is this an obsolete/orphaned package? Thanks, Ken Wolcott -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ:

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.11

Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Apr 5 00:18, Mark Geisert wrote: Mark Geisert wrote: Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-04-05 00:54, Mark Geisert wrote: When building in winsup/utils, I hit this: [snip] I found that the generated winsup/utils/Makefile has MINGW_CXX := i686-w64-mingw32-g++

Re: Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Be truthful about reporting whether readahead is available

Von: Corinna Vinschen An: cygwin-patches@cygwin.com Cc: Thomas Wolff Datum: 5. April 2016 um 15:55 Betreff: Re: [PATCH] Be truthful about reporting whether readahead is available Thomas? Any input? Yes, let's fix the patch so. Sorry for the

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mutt-1.6.0-1

Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 6:03 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote: > New versions 1.6.0-1 of > > mutt > > is available in the Cygwin distribution: > > CHANGES > Last upstream release. First 1.6.x Thanks for the update! Could you maybe build it with slang? That way mutt can

Re: Windows file share under Cygwin?

On Apr 5 05:04, Deni wrote: > Hi, I have an issue with mounting Windows file share in Cygwin. > > We have Windows file share which is using NFS to share content. I was > assigned to install Cygwin on it so some application can connect over SFTP > to that server. > > Now they need to access

Re: Windows file share under Cygwin?

Greetings, Deni! > We have Windows file share which is using NFS to share content. You're contradicting yourself. Windows (CIFS) file sharing is not the same as Linux (NFS). You can have NFS server on Windows (Cygwin for example provide one), but I see no reason to do so. > I was assigned to

Updated: mutt-1.6.0-1

New versions 1.6.0-1 of mutt is available in the Cygwin distribution: CHANGES Last upstream release. First 1.6.x Full details on: http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/UPDATING DESCRIPTION The Mutt E-Mail Client "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less." Mutt is a small but very powerful

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: mutt-1.6.0-1

New versions 1.6.0-1 of mutt is available in the Cygwin distribution: CHANGES Last upstream release. First 1.6.x Full details on: http://www.mutt.org/doc/devel/UPDATING DESCRIPTION The Mutt E-Mail Client "All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less." Mutt is a small but very powerful

Re: [PATCH v3] Refactor to avoid nonnull checks on "this" pointer.

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 4:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > And reverted. This patch is the culprit for the problem reported in > https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-04/msg00085.html > > Can you please take another look, Peter? Huh, that's odd... I'll take a look when I

Re: openssl 1.1 beta release available?

Greetings, Gerrit Haase! > is there an openssl 1.1 beta build available somewhere, or is it > planned to release soon? Betas are rarely built for Cygwin. Wait for a full release, or ask to build with a specific patch, if you need and unable to do that yourself. -- With best regards, Andrey

openssl 1.1 beta release available?

Hello, is there an openssl 1.1 beta build available somewhere, or is it planned to release soon? Regards, Gerrit =^..^= -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info:

Re: Missing dependency ?

On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 01:36:39PM +0200, Nicolas Viard wrote: > I've got an error 500 trying to run git instaweb (after installing > gitweb package) because nothing was installed to run > /usr/share/gitweb/gitweb.cgi . > I solved it with perl-CGI package. > > So I think a dependency between

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: git v2.8.0-1

Version 2.8.0-1 of Git has been uploaded and should be coming soon to a mirror near you. This update includes the following packages: - git - git-cvs - git-debuginfo - git-email - git-gui - gitk - git-svn This is an update to the latest upstream release. For a full list of the

Updated: git v2.8.0-1

Version 2.8.0-1 of Git has been uploaded and should be coming soon to a mirror near you. This update includes the following packages: - git - git-cvs - git-debuginfo - git-email - git-gui - gitk - git-svn This is an update to the latest upstream release. For a full list of the

Missing dependency ?

Hello, I've got an error 500 trying to run git instaweb (after installing gitweb package) because nothing was installed to run /usr/share/gitweb/gitweb.cgi . I solved it with perl-CGI package. So I think a dependency between gitweb and perl-CGI is missing, am I right ? Regards, Nicolas Viard

Re: make command is throwing a "cygheap base mismatch detected" error.

Looks like I solved the issue by re-installing Docker Toolbox. Thanks. Sorry for the trouble. From: cygwin-ow...@cygwin.com on behalf of Rory Charles Sent: 05 April 2016 11:49 To: cygwin@cygwin.com

Re: make command is throwing a "cygheap base mismatch detected" error.

I would add a cygcheck file for you, but I'm not able to add attachments, it seems. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info:

[ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.12

Hi Cygwin friends and users, I just released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.12. This is basically -0.11 with a patch to accommodate gcc 6 removed. This patch introduced the regression reported in https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-04/msg00085.html All the rest of this mail is what you know

TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.12

Hi Cygwin friends and users, I just released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.12. This is basically -0.11 with a patch to accommodate gcc 6 removed. This patch introduced the regression reported in https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2016-04/msg00085.html All the rest of this mail is what you know

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.11

On Apr 5 00:18, Mark Geisert wrote: > Mark Geisert wrote: > >Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > >>On 2016-04-05 00:54, Mark Geisert wrote: > >>>When building in winsup/utils, I hit this: > >>[snip] > >>>I found that the generated winsup/utils/Makefile has > >>>MINGW_CXX := i686-w64-mingw32-g++ >

make command is throwing a "cygheap base mismatch detected" error.

Hello, I'm using Docker for Windows alongside TortoiseGit and Git for Windows and I installed cygwin to get the make functionality. It was working fine and then I updated TortoiseGit, Git for Windows and cygwin and now I am getting the below error. $ make 3 [main] make (8180)

[newlib-cygwin] Add latest changes to release message

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;h=8d67708a08082df4b077ee35dcfd4947c0a5b1f3 commit 8d67708a08082df4b077ee35dcfd4947c0a5b1f3 Author: Corinna Vinschen Date: Tue Apr 5 10:35:05 2016 +0200 Add latest changes to release message

Re: Unreliable flock

On Apr 5 05:08, Andrey Repin wrote: > Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > > > I guess you read that > > there's a way to use Windows mandatory locks, too. > > Yes, if I compile my own program. But I'm not. I'm writing a shell script. > And /usr/bin/flock fails to lock a file. Even though the man

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.11

On Apr 5 10:51, Ismail Donmez wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz > wrote: > > Hi Cygwin friends and users, > > > > > > Corinna just released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.11. > > > > If things are not going very wrong, this is

[newlib-cygwin] Revert "Refactor to avoid nonnull checks on "this" pointer."

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=newlib-cygwin.git;h=41abcc5825d33d78bd370997ba664e3c64eb6683 commit 41abcc5825d33d78bd370997ba664e3c64eb6683 Author: Corinna Vinschen Date: Tue Apr 5 10:26:06 2016 +0200 Revert "Refactor to avoid nonnull checks on "this"

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.11

* Yaakov Selkowitz (Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:29:11 -0500) > Corinna just released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.11. > > If things are not going very wrong, this is basically what you'll > get as 2.5.0-1 release (really, we mean it this time). Please, please > test and report regressions. As

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.11

Hi, On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:29 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > Hi Cygwin friends and users, > > > Corinna just released a new Cygwin TEST version 2.5.0-0.11. > > If things are not going very wrong, this is basically what you'll > get as 2.5.0-1 release (really, we mean it

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.11

Mark Geisert wrote: Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-04-05 00:54, Mark Geisert wrote: When building in winsup/utils, I hit this: [snip] I found that the generated winsup/utils/Makefile has MINGW_CXX := i686-w64-mingw32-g++ even though I am building on 64-bit. I can't reproduce this

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.11

Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-04-05 00:54, Mark Geisert wrote: When building in winsup/utils, I hit this: [snip] I found that the generated winsup/utils/Makefile has MINGW_CXX := i686-w64-mingw32-g++ even though I am building on 64-bit. I can't reproduce this with git master. Are

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] TEST RELEASE: Cygwin 2.5.0-0.11

On 2016-04-05 00:54, Mark Geisert wrote: When building in winsup/utils, I hit this: [snip] I found that the generated winsup/utils/Makefile has MINGW_CXX := i686-w64-mingw32-g++ even though I am building on 64-bit. I can't reproduce this with git master. Are you sure you have both a