move from one host machine to another host machine, and
that you do not
want the grief of having to identify the variant drivename every time and
manually re-configure
the line in /etc/fstab as
f:/cygwin_1.7/usr/bin /usr/bin ntfs binary 0 0
or
h:/cygwin_1.7/usr/bin /usr/bin ntfs binary 0
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:37:58PM +0800, ??? wrote:
The entry that you used in your previous mail was not correctly formatted.
It should be something like:
f:/cygwin_1.7/usr/bin /usr/bin ntfs binary 0 0
That is great. Thanks for your patient.
I have another question. Can
That's one of those Why not just try it questions but the answer is
no. How could that possibly work?
Thanks. I have tried it.
I think it is possible. The relative path can be convented the
absolute path according to where cygwin1.dll lives.
--
Problem reports:
how to let cygwin does not mount /bin /usr/bin automaticlly?
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
tianlijian wrote:
how to let cygwin does not mount /bin /usr/bin automaticlly?
Lots of things won't work without that mount. I advise not to tamper with it.
cheers,
DaveK
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq
I use a older version of 1.7, which do not mount `/bin', `/usr/bin'
automatically. It works well.
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Dave Korn
dave.korn.cyg...@googlemail.com wrote:
tianlijian wrote:
how to let cygwin does not mount /bin /usr/bin automaticlly?
Lots of things won't work
On 09/22/2009 11:01 AM, tianlijian wrote:
I use a older version of 1.7, which do not mount `/bin', `/usr/bin'
automatically. It works well.
Why do you care what Cygwin requires here? Are you having a
problem?
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc
tianlijian wrote:
I use a older version of 1.7, which do not mount `/bin', `/usr/bin'
automatically.
Something must have gone wrong with creating fstab during the upgrade I
guess, it should have been done.
It works well.
What happens when a shell script begins #!/bin/sh? Alternatively
of 1.7, which do not mount `/bin', `/usr/bin'
automatically. It works well.
Why do you care what Cygwin requires here? Are you having a
problem?
--
Larry Hall http://www.rfk.com
RFK Partners, Inc. (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office
216 Dalton Rd
a older version of 1.7, which do not mount `/bin', `/usr/bin'
automatically. It works well.
Why do you care what Cygwin requires here? Are you having a
problem?
I want to put thd command according to filesytem hierarchy standard,
that is putting the cmd such as sh in /bin, and env in /usr/bin/.
Ah
do not mount `/bin', `/usr/bin'
automatically. It works well.
Why do you care what Cygwin requires here? Are you having a
problem?
I want to put thd command according to filesytem hierarchy standard,
that is putting the cmd such as sh in /bin, and env in /usr/bin/.
Ah, OK. I understand
2009/9/22 ︶ㄣ無名氏:
Thanks. I want to know how to change this configuration.
I do as follows:
bash-3.2$ /bin/umount /usr/bin
umount: /usr/bin: Operation not permitted
but i does not work. Any idea?
/etc/fstab
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
Again, I'd ask that you http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR. I
don't need the
spam and others that respond to you also are likely to not want to see more.
On 09/22/2009 12:11 PM, ︶ㄣ無名氏 wrote:
Thanks. I want to know how to change this configuration.
I do as follows:
bash-3.2$
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:11:23AM +0800, ??? wrote:
Thanks. I want to know how to change this configuration.
I do as follows:
bash-3.2$ /bin/umount /usr/bin
umount: /usr/bin: Operation not permitted
but i does not work. Any idea?
If you want /usr/bin to point someplace
I have try the command:
$ mount -f -o binary,user 'f:\cygwin_1.7\usr\bin\' /usr/bin
mount: /usr/bin: Operation not permitted
The -f option does not work well.
I have alse add this line to fstab:
ntfs f:\cygwin_1.7\usr\bin\ /usr/bin binary,user 0 0
It fails, too.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 00:34
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:09:06AM +0800, ??? wrote:
I have try the command:
$ mount -f -o binary,user 'f:\cygwin_1.7\usr\bin\' /usr/bin
mount: /usr/bin: Operation not permitted
The -f option does not work well.
You really do need the -o override option that I mentioned.
See: http
$ mount -f -o override 'f:\cygwin_1.7\usr\bin\' /usr/bin
mount: /usr/bin: Operation not permitted
I have used the `override' option, but the error occurs again.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:21, Christopher Faylor
cgf-use-the-mailinglist-ple...@cygwin.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:09
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:36:13AM +0800, ??? wrote:
$ mount -f -o override 'f:\cygwin_1.7\usr\bin\' /usr/bin
mount: /usr/bin: Operation not permitted
I have used the `override' option, but the error occurs again.
Sorry for the misinformation. You need to add an entry for /usr/bin
The entry that you used in your previous mail was not correctly formatted.
It should be something like:
f:/cygwin_1.7/usr/bin /usr/bin ntfs binary 0 0
That is great. Thanks for your patient.
I have another question. Can the first field of fstab use relative
path. I expect to make the cygwin
Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2009-02-07 00:37 skrev Lee D.Rothstein:
First, PATH must include the Windows path of the /bin, where
typically
both mintty.exe and cygwin1.dll' will be found. Remember, this
is a
Here, I think I have the path right, since, the Windows equivalent
of '/bin'
Lee D. Rothstein wrote:
Peter Rosin wrote:
Den 2009-02-07 00:37 skrev Lee D.Rothstein:
First, PATH must include the Windows path of the /bin, where
typically
both mintty.exe and cygwin1.dll' will be found. Remember, this
is a
Here, I think I have the path right, since, the
Op Mon, 12 Jul 2004 11:32:30 +0100 schreef Max Bowsher
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
: Christopher Faylor wrote:
[...]
: The FHS dictates no subdirectories in /usr/bin and I think it's a good
: rule. Program specific subdirectories belong in /usr/lib.
:
: ...
:
: Why didn't rpm just put its binaries
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:02:59AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
My reluctance to do that is because the standard place to look for DLLs
and
programs on Cygwin is /usr/bin. I don't understand why, because they need
to
be in a subdirectory, they should transfer to the less
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:32:30AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:02:59AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
My reluctance to do that is because the standard place to look for DLLs
and
programs on Cygwin is /usr/bin. I don't understand why, because they
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 12:18:23AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 02:08:55PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
I propose to relocate all the above into a directory /usr/bin/subversion,
Sorry, no. /usr/bin is a flat structure. It does not contain
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 02:08:55PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
I propose to relocate all the above into a directory /usr/bin/subversion,
Sorry, no. /usr/bin is a flat structure. It does not contain
subdirectories.
What is the reason for this? I feel this specific
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Max Bowsher
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RFC] Change to subversion package: Move /usr/bin/* -
/usr/bin/subversion/* and add symlinks in /usr/bin
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Behalf Of Max Bowsher
Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 6:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [RFC] Change to subversion package: Move /usr/bin/* -
/usr/bin/subversion/* and add symlinks in /usr/bin
Christopher Faylor
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
You can then compile the subversion executables to look for DLLs in the
above directory.
Um, how? To the best of my knowledge the Windows dynamic loader does not have this
level of sophistication.
Max.
On Jul 7 14:42, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
You can then compile the subversion executables to look for DLLs in the
above directory.
Um, how? To the best of my knowledge the Windows dynamic loader does not have this
level of sophistication.
That would probably require a
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
You can then compile the subversion executables to look for DLLs in the
above directory.
Um, how? To the best of my knowledge the Windows dynamic loader does not
have this level of sophistication.
Max.
Well, by default it
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
You can then compile the subversion executables to look for DLLs in the
above directory.
Um, how? To the best of my knowledge the Windows dynamic loader does not
have this level of sophistication.
$ zcat /etc/setup/subversion.lst.gz
...
usr/bin/cygsvn_client-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_delta-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_diff-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_fs-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_ra-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_ra_dav-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_ra_local-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_ra_svn-1-0.dll
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 02:08:55PM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
$ zcat /etc/setup/subversion.lst.gz
...
usr/bin/cygsvn_client-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_delta-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_diff-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_fs-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_ra-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_ra_dav-1-0.dll
Christopher Faylor writes:
Sorry, no. /usr/bin is a flat structure. It does not contain subdirectories.
There are
glui-examples
ncurses-test-dll
cgf
Ciao
Volker
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
$ zcat /etc/setup/subversion.lst.gz
...
usr/bin/cygsvn_client-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_delta-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_diff-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_fs-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_ra-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_ra_dav-1-0.dll
usr/bin/cygsvn_ra_local-1-0.dll
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Christopher Faylor writes:
Sorry, no. /usr/bin is a flat structure. It does not contain subdirectories.
There are
glui-examples
ncurses-test-dll
I'll relocate ncurses-test-dll to /usr/lib/ncurses/test/ on the next
release. (/usr/lib/ not /usr/share, because these
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 03:58:53PM +0200, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Christopher Faylor writes:
Sorry, no. /usr/bin is a flat structure. It does not contain subdirectories.
There are
glui-examples
ncurses-test-dll
So, crossing the street when it says Don't Walk is ok since you saw
somebody
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 02:45:32PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
Christopher Faylor writes:
Sorry, no. /usr/bin is a flat structure. It does not contain
subdirectories.
There are
glui-examples
ncurses-test-dll
I'll relocate ncurses-test-dll to
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:21:55AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Max Bowsher wrote:
I propose to relocate all the above into a directory
/usr/bin/subversion, and add symlinks to the executables in /usr/bin .
Why not use /usr/share/subversion, or even /opt/subversion, for the
Christopher Faylor writes:
So, crossing the street when it says Don't Walk is ok since you saw
somebody do it just the other day?
Well...
cgf
vz
/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:57:22PM -0500, Jon A. Lambert wrote:
Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote:
I encounter the problem while installing a tool running on Cygwin, that
comes from MicroCross (www.microcross.com) XTools The tool installs all
important things
Jon A. Lambert wrote on Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:03 PM:
Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote:
Thank for the answers
Can any gurus tell me what is the real use of /usr/bin as a mount
point and /usr/bin as a physically existing directory in the Cygwin
directory ? Sometime i am too much curious !?
OK
Now i understand a little bit (NOT 100%) the fine features of /usr/bin as
mount point and as physicically existing directory.
I encounter the problem while installing a tool running on Cygwin, that
comes from MicroCross (www.microcross.com) XTools
The tool installs all important things and
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 09:59:15AM +0100, J?rg Schaible wrote:
It is the way mount works (in any Unix)! You can force a mount without
a mount point, but ls the parent directory and you see why. The only
question you could arise for Cygwin here is why they use a mount at all
for /usr/bin, but
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:45:43PM +0100, Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote:
Now i understand a little bit (NOT 100%) the fine features of /usr/bin
as mount point and as physicically existing directory.
I encounter the problem while installing a tool running on Cygwin, that
comes from MicroCross
Christopher Faylor wrote on Friday, December 05, 2003 3:23 PM:
Nah. It's just because we are so frigging mean.
Walking on the edge for so many years now g
WASFM
Igor, wtf cannot translate ... :)
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
I should open up a DOS window and create it. No I don't think I will.
I think the mount of C:/cygwin/bin /usr/bin is sufficient.
--
J. Lambert
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote on Friday, December 05, 2003 3:23 PM:
Nah. It's just because we are so frigging mean.
Walking on the edge for so many years now g
You mean teetering on the edge, don't you? ;-)
WASFM
Igor, wtf cannot translate ... :)
Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote:
I encounter the problem while installing a tool running on Cygwin, that
comes from MicroCross (www.microcross.com) XTools
The tool installs all important things and the bash setup file to /usr/bin.
Right. They are the ones creating a physical c:\cygwin\usr\bin
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 12:57:22PM -0500, Jon A. Lambert wrote:
Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote:
I encounter the problem while installing a tool running on Cygwin, that
comes from MicroCross (www.microcross.com) XTools The tool installs all
important things and the bash setup file to /usr/bin.
Right.
Christopher Faylor wrote:
obligatory questionDoes MicroCross provide source code for the cygwin
they provide?/obligatory question
I'm sure this has come up before but I'd like to hear from anyone who has
purchased something recently.
http://www.microcross.com/html/copying_rights.html
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 02:06:40PM -0500, Jon A. Lambert wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
obligatory questionDoes MicroCross provide source code for the cygwin
they provide?/obligatory question
I'm sure this has come up before but I'd like to hear from anyone who has
purchased something
]
Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2003 13:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to execute bash file under /usr/bin despite setting
PATH=/us r/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:43:23AM +0100, Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote:
Please help me to understand Cygwin because i am
Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote:
Thank for the answers
Can any gurus tell me what is the real use of /usr/bin as a mount point and
/usr/bin as a physically existing directory in the Cygwin directory ?
Sometime i am too much curious !?
Nguyen
I'm stumped as I can't think of any use.
Why did you
?
Sometime i am too much curious !?
Nguyen
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 3. Dezember 2003 13:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to execute bash file under /usr/bin despite setting
PATH=/us r/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6
On Thu, 4 Dec 2003, Jon A. Lambert wrote:
Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote:
Thank for the answers
Can any gurus tell me what is the real use of /usr/bin as a mount point and
/usr/bin as a physically existing directory in the Cygwin directory ?
Sometime i am too much curious !?
Nguyen
I'm
Hello friends
Please help me to understand Cygwin because i am an unexperienced user of
CygWin
I want to start some bash files or *.exe under /usr/bin so i have set in my
profile file
...
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:$PATH
...
and put my bash files or *.exe under /usr/bin
Hello Huh-Dung,
Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote on Wednesday, December 03, 2003 10:43 AM:
Please help me to understand Cygwin because i am an unexperienced
user of CygWin
I want to start some bash files or *.exe under /usr/bin so i
have set in my profile file ...
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:43:23AM +0100, Nguyen, Huu-Dung wrote:
Please help me to understand Cygwin because i am an unexperienced user of
CygWin
I want to start some bash files or *.exe under /usr/bin so i have set in my
profile file
...
PATH=/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin
60 matches
Mail list logo
