On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/24/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
I'm not sure everyone is paying full attention here.
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU again. Reformatted.
The entry just defines TOFU:
Text Over, Full-quote Under (or, in the original German, Text
On Oct 24 11:08, Jonathan Lanier wrote:
One completely wild guess would be that there is some attribute
associated with the process that might expose the native symlinks,
possibly for improved compatibility with SFU/Posix and CIFS;
Cygwin processes are ordinary Win32 processes, just linked
On 10/24/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
I'm not sure everyone is paying full attention here.
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU again. Reformatted.
The entry just defines TOFU:
Text Over, Full-quote Under (or, in the original German, Text Oben,
Fullquote Unten). A combination of top posting
DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/24/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
I'm not sure everyone is paying full attention here.
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU again. Reformatted.
The entry just defines TOFU:
Text Over, Full-quote Under (or, in the original German, Text Oben,
Fullquote Unten). A
(PCYMTNQREAIYR, TOFU, grokked; apologies - haven't been on this list for
about 9 years...)
One completely wild guess would be that there is some attribute
associated with the process that might expose the native symlinks,
possibly for improved compatibility with SFU/Posix and CIFS;
Cygwin
DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/24/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
I'm not sure everyone is paying full attention here.
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU again. Reformatted.
The entry just defines TOFU:
Text Over, Full-quote Under (or, in the original German, Text Oben,
Fullquote Unten). A
Jonathan Lanier wrote:
If anyone could
direct me to an ftp or http archive of the older Cygwin distributions,
it would be much appreciated. Thanks!
See:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=enlr=q=%22cygwin+time+machine%22btnG=Search
Particularly:
On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Certainly this and quoting raw email addresses could be offered as
guidelines in http://cygwin.com/problems.html. Care to offer a
patch
The submitting a patch guidelines seem to refer to program
patches... since this is only an HTML update, here it is.
On 10/25/06, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Certainly this and quoting raw email addresses could be offered as
guidelines in http://cygwin.com/problems.html. Care to offer a
patch
The submitting a patch guidelines seem to refer to program
patches...
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:07:19PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/25/06, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Certainly this and quoting raw email addresses could be offered as
guidelines in http://cygwin.com/problems.html. Care to offer a
patch
The
DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Certainly this and quoting raw email addresses could be offered as
guidelines in http://cygwin.com/problems.html. Care to offer a
patch?
The submitting a patch guidelines seem to refer to program
patches... since this is only
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:07:19PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/25/06, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Certainly this and quoting raw email addresses could be offered as
guidelines in http://cygwin.com/problems.html.
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 06:28:37PM -0400, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 03:07:19PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/25/06, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/25/06, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
Certainly this and quoting raw email addresses could
On Oct 22 22:56, Jonathan Lanier wrote:
Brief summary, before I get into details: Cygwin 1.5.21-1 on WinXP SP2
was working perfectly, until a new CIFS server was installed on our LAN.
[...]
The common factor to
all failures: they are all symbolic links on the CIFS server. Typical
failure
I can't help to think this is a bug in the CIFS server, rather than a
bug in Cygwin.
That is a tempting conclusion to reach; unfortunately I don't think it's
the right one, nor do I think this bug has to blamed on just one or the
other. Notice that I ran these tests 3 times, each compiled in a
Jonathan Lanier wrote:
Also, because (I know the FAQ
says not to say this, but I think it's useful information in this case)
we have a much older version of Cygwin (cygcheck reports v1.5.14) that
works flawlessly with CIFS and does not suffer the same problems. So,
at the very least, it appears
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Matthew Woehlke
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 12:53 PM
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin
Jonathan Lanier wrote:
Also, because (I know the FAQ
says not to say this, but I think it's useful information
Jonathan Lanier wrote:
Well, I thought of that - first rule of debugging, calculatus
eliminatus. I tried it; but, attempts to use the older DLLs with newer
apps (or vice-versa) result in corrupted shared memory, and force me to
reboot my WinXP box. I've been under the impression that
to run in DOS mode but it failed.
I will also try the same thing as Jonathan says.
Thanks,
Champ
- Original Message -
From: Larry Hall (Cygwin) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break
.
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin
Jonathan Lanier wrote:
Well, I thought of that - first rule of debugging, calculatus
eliminatus. I tried it; but, attempts to use the older DLLs with newer
apps (or vice-versa) result
. Thanks.
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin
Jonathan Lanier wrote:
Well, I thought of that - first rule of debugging, calculatus
eliminatus. I tried it; but, attempts to use the older DLLs with
newer apps
Yikes! Ditto - http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR. Thanks.
Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin
http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU. Reformatted.
Champ Mendis wrote:
- Original Message - From: Larry Hall
-
From: Larry Hall (Cygwin) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: cygwin@cygwin.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin
You too. http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU. Reformatted.
Jonathan Lanier wrote:
-Original Message-
From
^^
And, more importantly, http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#PCYMTNQREAIYR again.
Let's not make life any easier for spammers, eh?
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: 1.5.21-1: CIFS symlinks on network share break Cygwin
You too. http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU. Reformatted.
Jonathan
Brief summary, before I get into details: Cygwin 1.5.21-1 on WinXP SP2
was working perfectly, until a new CIFS server was installed on our LAN.
Since then, some apps won't run, directories won't list, and many
Cygwin-compiled applications are failing to recognize the correct file
size, including
Sorry for the duplicate post; my mail filter indicated that it had
blocked my outgoing message due to the attachment. Apparently, it
didn't. :)
- Jonathan Lanier
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Brief summary, before I get into details: Cygwin 1.5.21-1 on WinXP SP2
was working perfectly, until a new CIFS server was installed on our LAN.
Since then, some apps won't run, directories won't list, and many
Cygwin-compiled applications are failing to recognize the correct file
size, including
27 matches
Mail list logo
