http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2004-03/msg00245.html
http://cygwin.com/cgi-bin/get-raw-msg?listname=cygwin&date=2004-03&msgid=Pine.CYG.4.58.0403041424140.812%40lap
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:12:29AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Fri, 5 Mar 200
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:12:29AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Gregory Borota wrote:
> >>Looking at the headers for a message I sent recently (id 89248) I see
> >>that my email address was not mutilated in the Received: fie
On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:12:29AM -0500, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Gregory Borota wrote:
>>Looking at the headers for a message I sent recently (id 89248) I see
>>that my email address was not mutilated in the Received: field. If one
>>uses SBC Yahoo's smtp server he has his e
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Gregory Borota wrote:
> Looking at the headers for a message I sent recently (id 89248) I see that
> my email address was not mutilated in the Received: field. If one uses
> SBC Yahoo's smtp server he has his email address as username.
>
> If this is a very isolated incident th
Looking at the headers for a message I sent recently (id 89248) I see that
my email address was not mutilated in the Received: field. If one uses
SBC Yahoo's smtp server he has his email address as username.
If this is a very isolated incident then maybe nobody should bother.
If not maybe it shou
5 matches
Mail list logo