Hi all,
The current Cygwin DLL will freeze an xterm/rxvt when a large amount of
data is pasted into it. The problem was alleviated slightly in the newer
snapshots of the DLL, by an increase of the buffer size to 64k.
There is a fix that apparently allows pastes of any size. A patch has
been sub
Max Bowsher wrote:
Sorry, no.
An XP cmd box does everything I need. Rxvt doesn't seem to have any way to
let me cut and paste with just the mouse (I only have 2 buttons+scroll
on my
laptop).
On my non laptop 2 button mouse with a scroll, clicking the scroll
button pastes. Also Shift-Button 1
[mn] wrote:
No, you cannot claim that. rxvt still behaves strangely in some ways when
being executed in Windows XP, for instance because of an annoying
ClearType incompatibility. I do not know whether this grave bug has
been fixed in the meantime, I'm still using the 1.3.13-2 release. But
I st
Christopher Faylor wrote:
I don't know how often I've expressed my opinion but I am mildly against
it. The problem is that cygwin's pty implementation is not perfect. It
can't run some native windows programs and it can deadlock occasionally.
There are some patches available that potentially solv
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:10:14 -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>> Are things to the point where we could make rxvt the default
>> installed terminal
>> emulator instead of the DOS box? I can't imagine any Win9x user
>> could possibly
>> complain, and any NT+ user that would is simply misguided ;-
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 02:10:14 -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Are things to the point where we could make rxvt the default installed
terminal
> emulator instead of the DOS box? I can't imagine any Win9x user could
possibly
> complain, and any NT+ user that would is simply misguided ;-).
No, you
On 27 Nov 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 19:10, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>
> > Are things to the point where we could make rxvt the default installed terminal
> > emulator instead of the DOS box? I can't imagine any Win9x user could possibly
> > complain, and any NT+ user th
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 11:04:38PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 19:10, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
>>Are things to the point where we could make rxvt the default installed
>>terminal emulator instead of the DOS box? I can't imagine any Win9x
>>user could possibly complain, and
I found that the "run" command which comes with Cygwin-XFree is quite
useful for launching any shell script with a Windows link without a DOS
box flashing. The problem is that it works only when $(cygpath -w /) is
in your Windows PATH variable - otherwise it does not find cygwin1.dll.
But a sim
On 27-11-2002 13:04, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 19:10, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
Are things to the point where we could make rxvt the default installed terminal
emulator instead of the DOS box? I can't imagine any Win9x user could possibly
complain, and any NT+ user that woul
On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 19:10, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
> Are things to the point where we could make rxvt the default installed terminal
> emulator instead of the DOS box? I can't imagine any Win9x user could possibly
> complain, and any NT+ user that would is simply misguided ;-).
Well, it's
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:01:56PM -0700, Carlos C. Gonzalez wrote:
>I have looked all over the place and can't find any information on how to
>change from using the DOS box under Windows 98 when running cygwin.
>
>Would appreciate any insight anyone might have.
rxvt -e bash -l
cgf
--
Please do
12 matches
Mail list logo
