At 04:08 PM 1/1/2005, you wrote:
Brian Bruns wrote:
rant
I think you really really really need to reevaluate what you say
before you hit send.
The open source/free software developers that I communicate with/work
with wrote the stuff they did because they needed an
application/library/script for
Brian Bruns wrote:
If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
production or development environments, you should go a bit further
than I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself.
If you don't want to or are not able to pay attention to real
world bugs, cygwin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sitting in Germany makes it difficult for me to physically send you a machine.
What I can do, though, is to virtually hand over the machine to you via the
net. I have an ADSL connection with 3 megabits/sec download and 512
kilobit/sec
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. You are right, I did not look at the code, and
I certainly do not pretend to be able to fix this problem.
I am sorry to have to say that, but your message is a very good example
of the fundamental difference between a project that is useable and
reliable, and a
multiprocessor machines and nobody seems to care about it. You cannot
just expect people to wait until you someday have a system
that shows
the problem everytime they encounter a bug.
Actually since Cygwin is a free project this is a reasonable
expectation. If you want this fixed send the
If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
production or development environments, you should go a bit
further than
I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself.
OK. So, if he's unable to reproduce the problem, you want him
to... do what? Make random
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 11:31:00PM +0100, Stephane Donze wrote:
I am sorry to have to say that, but your message is a very good example
of the fundamental difference between a project that is useable and
reliable, and a project that almost works and will never do more that
that.
[snip]
If you
On Tuesday, December 28, 2004 5:31 PM [EST], Stephane Donze wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. You are right, I did not look at the
code, and I certainly do not pretend to be able to fix this problem.
I am sorry to have to say that, but your message is a very good
example of the
Stephane Donze wrote:
If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
production or development environments, you should go a bit further than
I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself. If you
don't want to or are not able to pay attention to real world bugs,
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 05:29:10PM -0800, Brian Dessent wrote:
Stephane Donze wrote:
If you guys want cygwin to be used by real people, in real life
production or development environments, you should go a bit further
than I don't have the problem on my computer, so fix it yourself. If
you don't
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 09:01:17AM +0100, St?phane Donz? wrote:
we have encountered random hangs and crashes in cygwin (see output of
cygcheck attached to this message) on a dual-processor server running
Windows Server 2003. IMHO, the so-called hyperthreading problems reported
recently on this
11 matches
Mail list logo
