RE: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviour of Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Newton, Doug
If this change is what is desired by the majority, that is fine. BUT, it should have been made clear that the fundamental behaviour of cygpath had changed. I have many scripts that no longer work. Even the jakarata ant tool's start-up script now mangles the classpath because of this change in

Re: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviour of Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Max Bowsher
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Doug wrote: If this change is what is desired by the majority, that is fine. BUT, it should have been made clear that the fundamental behaviour of cygpath had changed. I have many scripts that no longer work. Even the jakarata ant tool's

Re: cygpath bug in version 1.25 -- Fundamental Change in the Behaviour of Cygpath

2003-02-11 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 11:57:45PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Newton, Doug wrote: If this change is what is desired by the majority, that is fine. BUT, it should have been made clear that the fundamental behaviour of cygpath had changed. I have