Re: Why no-X11 ghostscript?

2005-12-29 Thread Angelo Graziosi
It seems that there are applications like gv-3.5.8-2 that require gs-x11. If you look at the post-install, gv.sh, at the end, it says: # Quiet the cygwin mailing lists about 'unknown device x11' mails cd /bin ln -sf /usr/X11R6/bin/gs.exe gs-x11 (the comment # Quiet... is in gv.sh!)

Why no-X11 ghostscript?

2005-12-28 Thread Rodrigo Medina
Hi, If I am not mistaken, gs-X11 does everything that gs-no-X11 does, then why distributing gs-no-X11 at all? A lot problems may arise due to the presence of two different programs with the same name. Of course all the programs of the package should go into /bin. Bye Happy holidays R.M. --

Re: Why no-X11 ghostscript?

2005-12-28 Thread Rodrigo Medina
On 2005/12/28 18:08:11, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: Rodrigo Medina wrote: Hi, If I am not mistaken, gs-X11 does everything that gs-no-X11 does, then why distributing gs-no-X11 at all? A lot problems may arise due to the presence of two different programs with the same name. Of course all

Re: Why no-X11 ghostscript?

2005-12-28 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Rodrigo Medina wrote: On 2005/12/28 18:08:11, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote: Rodrigo Medina wrote: Hi, If I am not mistaken, gs-X11 does everything that gs-no-X11 does, then why distributing gs-no-X11 at all? A lot problems may arise due to the presence of two different programs with the same