Sorry for my late response. I've been busy.
What's wrong with third parties simply installing any cygwin1.dll that they
want to distribute (subject to the GPL of course) in a setup-compatible
location and way? Then the only question is whether to install over any
existing DLL or not. That's
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Bob Rossi wrote:
Sorry for my late response. I've been busy.
What's wrong with third parties simply installing any cygwin1.dll that
they want to distribute (subject to the GPL of course) in a
setup-compatible location and way? Then the only question is whether
to
Igor Peshansky wrote:
On Tue, 28 Mar 2006, Bob Rossi wrote:
Sorry for my late response. I've been busy.
What's wrong with third parties simply installing any cygwin1.dll that
they want to distribute (subject to the GPL of course) in a
setup-compatible location and way? Then the
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 04:09:39AM +0700, Alexander J. Herrmann wrote:
I was following this thread and time will tell. Something you're maybe
not aware of that the cygwin1.dll soon will be distributed to thousends
of people who didn't even heard about cygwin. How come?
You may have heard about
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 04:09:39AM +0700, Alexander J. Herrmann wrote:
I was following this thread and time will tell. Something you're maybe
not aware of that the cygwin1.dll soon will be distributed to thousends
of people who didn't even heard about cygwin. How
On 3/25/06, Lev Bishop wrote:
We do already have FAQs for Why not install in C:\? and Why the
weird directory structure?. There is a FAQ for How do I compile a
Win32 executable that doesn't use Cygwin? but it doesn't specifically
mention that discussion of the binaries doesn't belong here
Hi,
Why can there be only 1 cygwin1.dll in the filesystem? Is this a
limitation of the dll or is it just a problem with applications
finding the wrong version of the cygwin1.dll when there are several?
Or is it just that certain cygwin registry keys get initialised wrong
if its not installed
Why can there be only 1 cygwin1.dll in the filesystem? Is this a
limitation of the dll or is it just a problem with applications
finding the wrong version of the cygwin1.dll when there are several?
It is an intentional design decision of cygwin. In order to properly
emulate POSIX semantics in
FAQ candidate? Either of Eric's explanations seem spot on, to me. And
this question does come up fairly regularly.
Lev
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:38:53PM -0500, Lev Bishop wrote:
FAQ candidate? Either of Eric's explanations seem spot on, to me. And
this question does come up fairly regularly.
In the FAQ, I think it would be a good idea to mention that this
limitation makes it impossible (outside of setup.exe)
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:38:53PM -0500, Lev Bishop wrote:
FAQ candidate? Either of Eric's explanations seem spot on, to me. And
this question does come up fairly regularly.
It is not 100% complete but I guess something like that should be in
the FAQ under a heading of:
Q) I see the way
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:40:51PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:38:53PM -0500, Lev Bishop wrote:
FAQ candidate? Either of Eric's explanations seem spot on, to me. And
this question does come up fairly regularly.
In the FAQ, I think it would be a good idea to mention that
On 3/25/06, Christopher Faylor wrote:
It is not 100% complete but I guess something like that should be in
the FAQ under a heading of:
Q) I see the way you're doing things and I don't agree. Certainly I
know more about this then you do. Please prove me wrong, although I
doubt that you
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:56:56PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:40:51PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:38:53PM -0500, Lev Bishop wrote:
FAQ candidate? Either of Eric's explanations seem spot on, to me. And
this question does come up fairly
Bob Rossi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:56:56PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:40:51PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:38:53PM -0500, Lev Bishop wrote:
FAQ candidate? Either of Eric's explanations seem spot on, to me. And
this question does
15 matches
Mail list logo
