Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
(At least there's a big company behind it
that has the (legal) responsability for the quality of the program..)
ROTFLMAO.
What legal responsibility? I hope you have pointed these fine folks to
the appropriate sections of the so-called License Agreements (i.e. we
But all silliness aside, there's a very good point to the seeming
extremes that the Cygwin project in particular, and the FSF in general,
go in order to protect the code base by ensuring the true freedom of
their sources.
I give you the Linux mess, as exhibit #1.
--
Unsubscribe info:
Sent: 02 September 2003 09:49 From: Ronald Landheer-Cieslak
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 06:46:59PM -0700, Shankar Unni wrote:
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
(At least there's a big company behind it
that has the (legal) responsability for the quality of the program..)
ROTFLMAO.
??
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 10:48:37AM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 06:46:59PM -0700, Shankar Unni wrote:
What legal responsibility? I hope you have pointed these fine folks to
the appropriate sections of the so-called License Agreements (i.e. we
agree that you
Shankar Unni wrote:
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
(At least there's a big company behind it that has the (legal)
responsability for the quality of the program..)
ROTFLMAO.
What legal responsibility? I hope you have pointed these fine folks to
the appropriate sections of the so-called License
Hughes, Bill wrote:
Even worse are the newer ones, which basically say: This software may
not work, tough. Even if it does work it may not work properly and
corrupt all your data, tough. You also agree to let us change the
software without telling you even though this may corrupt all your
Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
ROTFLMAO.
??
wtf(rotfl) + My A** Off.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 12:20:04PM +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote:
Where I was working at the time, they we're afraid of free software. Some
people, eh?
Actually, that kind of fear is probably more common that you thingk: where I
work, people are afraid of free software too, for two reasons:
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo Elfyn,
I found a thread from January about these two functions. Are they
included in the meantime?
Nope. I was working on implementing there libgen functions as I had a
need for them in application where they were a) not availabe and b) I
could not use the
Hello Elfyn,
I found a thread from January about these two functions. Are they
included in the meantime?
Nope. I was working on implementing there libgen functions as I had a
need for them in application where they were a) not availabe and b) I
could not use the *BSD/[L]GPL versions.
Why
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hello Elfyn,
I found a thread from January about these two functions. Are they
included in the meantime?
Nope. I was working on implementing there libgen functions as I had a
need for them in application where they were a) not availabe and b) I
could not use
Hallo Elfyn,
I found a thread from January about these two functions. Are they
included in the meantime?
Gerrit
--
=^..^=
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation:
12 matches
Mail list logo