Is there some reason why you aren't just using cygwin's symlink()
function? Reverse engineering and mimicking cygwin's symlinks seems to
be a pretty fragile way of writing an application which will play nicely
with cygwin. What if we change the way symlinks are written at some
point?
Yeah,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 02:47:23PM -0400, Adam Wolbach wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=windows+shortcut+file+format
The first match
http://mediasrv.ns.ac.yu/extra/fileformat/windows/lnk/shortcut.pdf
is what you're looking for and what I used when implementing the
shortcut stuff.
On Aug 3 18:39, Adam Wolbach wrote:
Coda's current symlink support in cygwin is nonexistent, but we are
looking to support symlinks in the same manner cygwin appears to -- as
special Windows shortcuts that cygwin can interpret as symlinks.
Allowing cygwin to see our conflicts as broken
On Fri, 4 Aug 2006, Adam Wolbach wrote:
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=windows+shortcut+file+format
The first match
http://mediasrv.ns.ac.yu/extra/fileformat/windows/lnk/shortcut.pdf
is what you're looking for and what I used when implementing the
shortcut stuff.
Thanks, this
Hello cygwin mailing list,
I'm a new subscriber looking to get some information relevant to the
Coda File System development at Carnegie Mellon University, which uses
cygwin as a platform to run on Windows 2000/WinXP. We rely heavily on
symbolic links for a number of different features, most
Adam Wolbach wrote:
I'm a new subscriber looking to get some information relevant to the
Coda File System development at Carnegie Mellon University, which uses
cygwin as a platform to run on Windows 2000/WinXP. We rely heavily on
symbolic links for a number of different features, most
6 matches
Mail list logo
