RE: jmp_buf size?

2009-02-04 Thread Jay
What is up with the size of jmp_buf? It appears that setjmp.h confuses bytes and ints, specifically in the Cygwin case. _JBLEN should be 13, not 13*4. or #define _JBTYPE to char, but that doesn't work as easily. ? I applied a local hack workaround, something like: typedef unsigned

Re: jmp_buf size?

2009-02-04 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
Jay wrote: What is up with the size of jmp_buf? It appears that setjmp.h confuses bytes and ints, specifically in the Cygwin case. _JBLEN should be 13, not 13*4. or #define _JBTYPE to char, but that doesn't work as easily. snip Did you see this reply to your first inquiry on this subject?

RE: jmp_buf size?

2009-02-04 Thread Jay
Thanks, sorry, I didn't see that. - Jay Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 18:49:50 -0500 From: reply-to-list-only...@cygwin.com To: cygwin@cygwin.com CC: jay.kr...@cornell.edu Subject: Re: jmp_buf size? Jay wrote: What is up with the size of jmp_buf

jmp_buf size?

2009-01-29 Thread Jay
What is up with the size of jmp_buf? It appears that setjmp.h confuses bytes and ints. _JBLEN should be 13, not 13*4. or #define _JBTYPE to char, but that doesn't work as easily. ? - Jay -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports:

Re: jmp_buf size?

2009-01-29 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 05:07:42PM +, Jay wrote: What is up with the size of jmp_buf? It appears that setjmp.h confuses bytes and ints. _JBLEN should be 13, not 13*4. or #define _JBTYPE to char, but that doesn't work as easily. Huh. You would think that the fact that Cygwin's definition of