On Jan 10 18:21, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Corinna Vinschen
Well, the file I downloaded was a self-extracting zip archive and the
file it contains is called Windows6.1-KB983528-x64.msu, so I'm fairly
certain it's the right one for an AMD64 system.
Corinna Vinschen writes:
On Jan 10 18:21, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Corinna Vinschen
Well, the file I downloaded was a self-extracting zip archive and the
file it contains is called Windows6.1-KB983528-x64.msu, so I'm fairly
certain it's the right one for an
On Jan 11 08:19, Carson Chittom wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
On Jan 10 18:21, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Corinna Vinschen
Well, the file I downloaded was a self-extracting zip archive and the
file it contains is called Windows6.1-KB983528-x64.msu, so
On Jan 9 17:36, Václav Zeman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/09/2012 02:43 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Johan,
please don't http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU. Thanks.
On Jan 4 21:25, Johan van den Berg wrote:
I am very happy to report that
On 09 Jan 2012, at 3:43 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
How's the performance in your scenario when applying the below patch
instead of yours?
I have to run back with my tails between my legs. I implemented your patch, and
the transfer speed on a 200ms latency, 10mbit max link went down to
On Jan 10 14:45, Johan van den Berg wrote:
On 09 Jan 2012, at 3:43 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
How's the performance in your scenario when applying the below patch
instead of yours?
I have to run back with my tails between my legs. I implemented your patch,
and the transfer speed on
10, 2012 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: socket performance (was Re: Building cygwin1.dll)
On Jan 10 14:45, Johan van den Berg wrote:
On 09 Jan 2012, at 3:43 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
How's the performance in your scenario when applying the below patch
instead of yours?
I have to run back with my
On Jan 10 15:24, Steven Hartland wrote:
If your running Windows 7 or 2k8 are you running the following hotfix, if not
you should try that too, just in case you machine has got a degraded tcp
stack.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983528
I tried that, but it doesn't install. The installer
On Jan 10 17:28, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 10 15:24, Steven Hartland wrote:
If your running Windows 7 or 2k8 are you running the following hotfix, if
not
you should try that too, just in case you machine has got a degraded tcp
stack.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983528
I
- Original Message -
From: Corinna Vinschen
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: socket performance (was Re: Building cygwin1.dll)
On Jan 10 15:24, Steven Hartland wrote:
If your running Windows 7 or 2k8 are you running the following hotfix, if not
you should try
On Jan 10 17:05, Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 10 15:24, Steven Hartland wrote:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/983528
I tried that, but it doesn't install. The installer tells me The
update is not applicable to your computer. This is W7
- Original Message -
From: Corinna Vinschen
Well, the file I downloaded was a self-extracting zip archive and the
file it contains is called Windows6.1-KB983528-x64.msu, so I'm fairly
certain it's the right one for an AMD64 system.
Windows6.1-KB983528-x64.msu is the file I have here
On 10 Jan 2012, at 4:45 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
What Windows versions are we talking about? Is that pre-Vista? XP,
for instance? If so, setting the buffer size 64K should have no effect.
Destination Windows: Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard 64bit (Intel Xeon)
Destination Linux: Linux
Johan,
please don't http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU. Thanks.
On Jan 4 21:25, Johan van den Berg wrote:
I am very happy to report that increasing the send and receive buffers
has done the job (at least, on a 10MBit link but will be testing a
100Mbit in a few days). I calculated the ideal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 01/09/2012 02:43 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Johan,
please don't http://cygwin.com/acronyms/#TOFU. Thanks.
On Jan 4 21:25, Johan van den Berg wrote:
I am very happy to report that increasing the send and receive
buffers has done the
Corinna Vinschen writes:
it's nice to know that you could increase the performance by increasing
the buffer sizes. However, I'm reluctant to implement this as a generic
option. As far as I know the socket buffers are taken from nonpaged pool,
so generically using 2 Meg buffers will take a
On 1/9/12 11:22 PM, Henry S. Thompson wrote:
Corinna Vinschen writes:
it's nice to know that you could increase the performance by increasing
the buffer sizes. However, I'm reluctant to implement this as a generic
option. As far as I know the socket buffers are taken from nonpaged pool,
17 matches
Mail list logo
