Re: what to use in g++ instead of GetOpt?

Umm, Randy, not to downplay the humor or the valid points in your soliloquy, but he did say well-dressed C++ programmers, and everybody knows (tm) that Real Programmers aren't well-dressed (they also don't use C++, it's for the wavering who can't decide between C and Java [to paraphrase]). Of

Re: what to use in g++ instead of GetOpt?

Howdy, Igor, Yes. I guess the oxymoron confused me, especially since I always program in the buff. Randy (why not?) At 19:12 2002-12-22, Igor Pechtchanski wrote: Umm, Randy, not to downplay the humor or the valid points in your soliloquy, but he did say well-dressed C++ programmers, and

Re: what to use in g++ instead of GetOpt?

Randall, You'd pretty much have to, being an AI ;-) Igor P.S. Sorry for the familiarity... On Sun, 22 Dec 2002, Randall R Schulz wrote: Howdy, Igor, Yes. I guess the oxymoron confused me, especially since I always program in the buff. Randy (why not?) At 19:12 2002-12-22, Igor

what to use in g++ instead of GetOpt?

Howdy all! In the old days of libg++ there was something called GetOpt to help parse command line options. In these days of stdlibc++ it seems to be gone. What are well-dressed C++ programmers using to parse their command lines these days? Thanks! Ed -- Unsubscribe info:

Re: what to use in g++ instead of GetOpt?

Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello there, Edward, if that is your real name. No, it's an alias. However, my real name is, coincidently, Ed. Here's how it is, Ed... Real Programmers (tm) code to the bare metal. They don't use no stinkin' libraries. If you can't decode your

Re: what to use in g++ instead of GetOpt?

Greetings, Earthling, At 20:59 2002-12-21, Ed wrote: Randall R Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello there, Edward, if that is your real name. No, it's an alias. However, my real name is, coincidently, Ed. Got it. Plausible deniability. Or is it deniable plausibility? Here's how it