I have the following comments about the new cygwin setup
1) The new 'View' {category, full, partial} is a nice organizational
feature. Thanks.
2) a) Move the view label closer to the view button. The label is
floating off to the side and doesn't appear to be connected.
H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> Any chance in making the next version of the setup program having "Partial" as
> default view (please)
>
Once we change setup to save the responses from the last time it was run - you
will have what you want - it would always show partial first (I would think) if
that was
I would suggest something like what you said with the user being
able to pick up more than one configurations with only one snapshot per
configuration. If that was too difficult, then maybe just a preset set of
configurations with the user only able to pick one. If the user wanted to
go
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 06:04:34PM +0100, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
>Any chance in making the next version of the setup program having "Partial" as
>default view (please)
No. Just click on the "View" button. It's not that hard.
cgf
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simpl
Any chance in making the next version of the setup program having "Partial" as
default view (please)
--
H.Merijn BrandAmsterdam Perl Mongers (http://www.amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.7.2 & 630 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11. Smoking perl
At 12:26 AM 11/16/2001, Robert Collins wrote:
>===
> >Rob
>
>Thanks for the suggestions and I did finally check the archives. I
>think I agree with Ralf Habacker that there should be preset
>configurations
>that we can just click to install on a "new" machine. I would wish for
>some
>preset con
===
>Rob
Thanks for the suggestions and I did finally check the archives. I
think I agree with Ralf Habacker that there should be preset
configurations
that we can just click to install on a "new" machine. I would wish for
some
preset configurations like:
SELECT ONE OR MORE CONFIGURATIONS AND
>Use the prev/curr/exp radio buttons at the top of the setup.exe screen to
toggle all currently installed
>packages between prev/curr/exp versions. As for getting the source for
everything, I've added that to the
>wishlist. Finally, installing "everything" does not make sense - see the
list archi
- Original Message -
From: "Khoa Do" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 16, 2001 1:17 PM
Subject: about cygwin setup
...
> Heck, I want an automatic feed if I can help it. Where is the source to
>
I have a comment about setup.exe. How come you don't have an option
to download everything including the source for all the packages that is
being offered? I just want the latest version of everything including the
source. When I first started setup.exe, I thought that I would be able t
Hi!
I'm running setup.exe 2.78.2.13, I'm a little
frustrated over the fact that the only information
not saved between invocations is the proxy server setting and the
port number.
As I normally run behind a FW, I need to fill in that
information every time.
Any reason for that, or is my ini fi
On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 09:49:12AM -0400, Earnie Boyd wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:24:02PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>> >"Fred T. Hamster" wrote:
>> >> is the official installation process now involving a bunch of registry
>> >> edits before cygwin ca
>Don't you find it strange that the people that are having problems are
the ones that are deleting their previous installation? The workaround
to this problem is don't delete your current installation, just use
setup with the current installation.
Wrong !
I had the problem with my first install
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:24:02PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
> >"Fred T. Hamster" wrote:
> >> is the official installation process now involving a bunch of registry
> >> edits before cygwin can be installed again, or is this setup program
> >> actually quite
> > I had downloaded all the Cygwin setup binary tarballs to
> > just one directory and launched setup from there. The reason I choose to
> > reinstall was all the Cygwin setup binary tarballs showed up as new
again.
> >
> Did you do setup to do the Download from th
Travis Howell wrote:
> I had downloaded all the Cygwin setup binary tarballs to
> just one directory and launched setup from there. The reason I choose to
> reinstall was all the Cygwin setup binary tarballs showed up as new again.
>
Did you do setup to do the Download from the int
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I don't know what you are asking. I don't use the "cygpath" program in
> setup.exe.
Your right - that question was way to long and ran on way to much - sorry.
What I was referring to was the recent change to setup for mount points and
paths as seen here from the Ch
Please check out the project web page for links to available information
and ports: http://cygwin.com/ .
If you don't see what you need there, then the cygwin mailing list is
the best place to make observations or get questions answered.
Information on the mailing list is available at the projec
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:24:02PM -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>"Fred T. Hamster" wrote:
>> is the official installation process now involving a bunch of registry
>> edits before cygwin can be installed again, or is this setup program
>> actually quite busted?
>
>It appears that the new setu
"Fred T. Hamster" wrote:
> is the official installation process now involving a bunch of registry
> edits before cygwin can be installed again, or is this setup program
> actually quite busted?
It appears that the new setup program is not operating correctly for
SOME users. This may be because
The first attempt to install Cygwin using the 2.54 setup was over an
exisitng install, I had downloaded all the Cygwin setup binary tarballs to
just one directory and launched setup from there. The reason I choose to
reinstall was all the Cygwin setup binary tarballs showed up as new again.
The
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 04:04:54PM -0400, Brian Keener wrote:
>Travis,
>
>Are these clean installs that you are doing or are you upgrading an existing
>installation. Also if you are upgrading are you making sure the packages you
>do not want to instal are set to 'keep'.
>
>Really need to know
I have found problems too
installing
xpm-4.0.0-2.tar.gz
0s||o_|/j|/usr/include/simx.h
and...
unable to create symlink "0s"#o_#"/j#/usr/include/simx.h" -> "X11/simx.h"
(replace # by random characters above ascii 128)
It said something similar when unpacking vim. At first I thought that th
i have also found the 2.54 version of setup to behave very brokenly.
i wiped out the entire directory where cygwin used to live in order to
do a clean install using the new setup.exe. i got a partial
installation... only a few programs showed up in the bin directory,
with a bunch of other
Travis,
Are these clean installs that you are doing or are you upgrading an existing
installation. Also if you are upgrading are you making sure the packages you
do not want to instal are set to 'keep'.
Really need to know if this is a new install or and upgrade to pursue this
further.
Ch
This just gets weirder and weirder...
I wipped out extra Cygwin installation that was created and main Cygwin
registry keys then attempted another install, this time it created an
openssh directory in the directory where all the Cygwin setup tarballs are
and installed everything in there. I am
I was just wondering if anyone else had serious problem with new Cygwin
setup 2.54 ?
I downloaded copy, selected Install from local directory, C:\Files\ at the
local packages directory, C:\Cygwin\ as the install directory with a unix
text type and install for all users.
The first time it
installation.
- Original Message -
From: rahul toley
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 11:00 AM
Subject: some more questions :cygwin setup failed
Hi Gerrit, Thanks for your help and explanation. I used setup.exe to install
cygwin . Still the shell gets
FYI, this mail is totally incomprehensible.
Please make some effort to format it correctly if you want people
to help you.
cgf
On Sat, Apr 14, 2001 at 11:00:50AM -0700, rahul toley wrote:
>Hi Gerrit,Thanks for your help and explanation. I used setup.exe to install cygwin .
>Still the shell ge
Hi Gerrit,
Thanks for your help and explanation. I used setup.exe to install cygwin . Still the shell gets killed . If I try to open the cygwin.dat(under C:\cygwin directory) file , it opens as a shell with title "Finished - cygwin"
the prompt itself shows "bad command or filename" . If I try t
On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 03:02:54PM +0200, Javor Nikolov wrote:
>cygwin's setup doesn't work without a mouse!
Go to your cellar and sprinkle corn flakes around the foundation. Make a trail
from the cellar to your computer. If you're like me, you'll have lots of mice.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe
cygwin's setup doesn't work without a mouse!
http://my.gbg.bg - Íàïðàâè ñè ñâîé ñîáñòâåí Ãþâå÷ - íîâèíè, ñïîðò, ìóçèêà, âðåìåòî,
êèíî...
http://kartichki.abv.bg/ - Èçïðàòè êàðòè÷êà çà Áàáà Ìàðòà :)
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Maxim Friedental schrieb:
>
> Hello!
>
> When clicking below the list of packages to install, the program fails.
>
> How to reproduce: setup.exe, Next, Install from local directory, Next, Next,
> Next, scroll till bottom of list and click below the
> last line.
Yes, for me on win98 today, i
Hello!
When clicking below the list of packages to install, the program fails.
How to reproduce: setup.exe, Next, Install from local directory, Next, Next, Next,
scroll till bottom of list and click below the
last line.
Thanks.
With best regards,
Maxim Friedental.
--
Want to unsubscribe fro
DJ Delorie writes:
> > also, is there any interest to use (real) packages in cygwin?
>
> There was, until we added .tar.gz support to setup :-)
>
> Seriously, people have talked about RPM, but until someone decides to
> actually *do* something, tarballs remain the standard "package" format
> f
> hopefully this doesnt turn out to be a silly question, but is the source
> for the setup utility available?
Yes. Get the cygwin sources, and it's in src/winsup/cinstall.
> also, is there any interest to use (real) packages in cygwin?
There was, until we added .tar.gz support to setup :-)
S
hopefully this doesnt turn out to be a silly question, but is the source
for the setup utility available?
also, is there any interest to use (real) packages in cygwin?
--
etoffi
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
No complaints, really.
At 6:35 pm central, Wednesday 22, still trying to
download Cygwin tools to redo my archine, inetutls
refused to DL.
Was someone replacing it was I was trying to download
it?
Guess we'll never know.
ftp.sunsite.utk.edu was the site.
Really, this tennessee site is the only one
38 matches
Mail list logo
