On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:20:12PM +1000, Robert Praetorius wrote:
> Looks fine. Bummer. That was my only guess. Unless the binary
> file came from a place that wasn't mounted.
>
> Here's an experiment:
>
> pick a binary that mutt will break
>
> mail it to yourself
Hi,
sometimes when I send binary attachments with mutt the attachments are
not readable by the recipient. It seems that mutt doesn't handle the
binaries well. This happens with .doc, .zip and some other files. In
most cases (on most days) it just worked, but today no binary file could
be sent wit
On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 02:38:15AM +1000, Robert Praetorius wrote:
> > Does anyone has a hint where to look for ?
>
> I would start with the output of the mount command. If the
> binary files live in a place that's mounted in text mode, I wouldn't
> be too surprised by their corruption.
